<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=188.92.75.244</id>
	<title>MediaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=188.92.75.244"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/188.92.75.244"/>
	<updated>2026-07-16T09:57:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Talk:Transformers_Animated:_The_AllSpark_Almanac/Events_Real-world_references&amp;diff=639537</id>
		<title>Talk:Transformers Animated: The AllSpark Almanac/Events Real-world references</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Talk:Transformers_Animated:_The_AllSpark_Almanac/Events_Real-world_references&amp;diff=639537"/>
		<updated>2011-09-20T12:35:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;188.92.75.244: /* Thanks to the author for information */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I&#039;m not happy with this page at all.  Suggestions? --[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] 21:32, 2 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Could do with links to appropriate Wikipedia articles maybe. --[[User:Abates|abates]] 22:01, 2 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it could use some categorizing, since there&#039;s some types of references like the stardates, the co-ordinates, and the quoted instruction manuals and TV show intros, etc. that have multiple entries. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 22:09, 2 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hmmmm ... I wonder, do the fake movies and chemicals REALLY need red links?  Do we want pages for each of them?  What would we say about them? --[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] 18:23, 3 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don&#039;t think so.  If there is no chance a page can ever be expanded beyond what is already made obvious in the context of where the linked term originally appeared, then I don&#039;t see a point in creating the page.  i.e., the only place &amp;quot;m&#039;kraan crystal&amp;quot; appears is right here, where it gets a barely-one-sentence note as being a crystal from the Animated continuity that was mentioned in the Almanac.  A whole page for it would have.... a barely-one-sentence note that it&#039;s a crystal from the Animated continuity that was mentioned in the Almanac.  We don&#039;t need it, and as-is there being like 500 of those on this page just makes it more of a strain on the eyes.  --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 10:56, 5 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Entirely agreed. There is absolutely no content for those particular minerals and films and whatnot.  I say kill the links.  In addition, they are really cluttering up the Wanted Pages. --[[User:Bluestreak7|Bluestreak7]] 18:18, 7 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Whoah, hold up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I can appreciate making articles for [[Garbage O&#039;s]] and the [[Detroit Powell Press]], these articles aren&#039;t in our standard format and porting all the references off to those articles is... really not the way to do it.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 20:02, 13 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, sorry.  Feel free to undo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks to the author for information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the article, but some disagree&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>188.92.75.244</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>