<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=71.255.163.56</id>
	<title>MediaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=71.255.163.56"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/71.255.163.56"/>
	<updated>2026-05-21T17:35:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Talk:Transformers:_Robots_in_Disguise_(2001_cartoon)&amp;diff=725172</id>
		<title>Talk:Transformers: Robots in Disguise (2001 cartoon)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Talk:Transformers:_Robots_in_Disguise_(2001_cartoon)&amp;diff=725172"/>
		<updated>2012-06-20T01:52:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;71.255.163.56: /* Characters */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The introductory text to this series is unnecessarily spun negatively against the series. The series had its good and bad moments, and was definitely geared toward a much younger audience than the Beast-era series had. What some in the fandom view as mediocrity others may appreciate or enjoy. I&#039;m attempting to edit the intro text to satisfactorily represent both viewpoints. [[User:Aurax|Aurax]] 15:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Following up on that.   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with Aurax&#039; sentiments... but as of July &#039;06, the series overview segment is still spun against the show.  I&#039;ve tried to really make it more impartial now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Animation studio?==&lt;br /&gt;
According to the credits, Dongwoo animation is listed but they&#039;re under &amp;quot;production collaboration&amp;quot; (製作協力). So, under &amp;quot;|animation studio=&amp;quot;? --[[User:Lonegamer78|Lonegamer78]] 03:11, 24 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of the companies you&#039;ve been crediting under &amp;quot;production company&amp;quot;, both NAS and Studio Gallop are animation studios.  Dongwoo is noted on Wikipedia as as &amp;quot;work for hire&amp;quot; studio for Studio Gallop.  Presumably they shared the workload to some extent.  Do the Car Robots credits differ by episode or are they like the RiD credits?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unhelpfully RiD credits the show as being &amp;quot;produced by&amp;quot; Nihon AD Systems and doesn&#039;t mention Studio Gallop or Dongwoo at all! --[[User:Abates|abates]] 03:48, 24 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps of note, Studio Gallop&#039;s web page [http://www.anime-gallop.co.jp/works/list05.html lists Car Robots] among their works. I couldn&#039;t find it listed on NAS or Dongwoo&#039;s sites. --[[User:Abates|abates]] 04:12, 24 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Opening credits are usually the same, but the end credits is where the differences are (i.e., voice actors). I&#039;ll have to check what few CR epsiodes I have. *furrows brow* Although I suppose Studio Gallop makes the most sense to be put under &amp;quot;animation studio&amp;quot; to an extent... --[[User:Lonegamer78|Lonegamer78]] 07:10, 24 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My best guess is that Studio Gallop provided the key animation and Dongwoo handled the in-betweening.  Dongwoo is a Korean studio, and the Japanese typically don&#039;t outsource any animation to them unless it&#039;s in-betweening. Just my theory, though. --[[User:DrSpengler|DrSpengler]] 01:22, 12 July 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception/Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
Should there be a section dealing with this? [[User:Eire|Eire]] 14.12 July 02 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:except in extreme cases, the wiki is used for objective details and leaves the opinions to the message broads. {{unsigned|24.141.130.38|21:20, 11 July 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s entirely possible to write objectively about the reception/criticism of the show.  We would not be saying &amp;quot;We love/hate this show,&amp;quot; but &amp;quot;A fair amount of fan reaction to the show was positive/negative,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;There was some controversy about the show in the media&amp;quot; or similar.&lt;br /&gt;
::On another note, please sign your Talk page posts.  Just click the Signature button (next-to-last on the right) above the editing window or type four tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;).--[[User:Apcog|Apcog]] 01:15, 12 July 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Characters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are the 5 Predacons that appear in the series suppose to be the only Predacons, or are there more of them back on Cybertron and across the universe?[[Special:Contributions/71.255.163.56|71.255.163.56]] 21:52, 19 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>71.255.163.56</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>