<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=72.64.104.41</id>
	<title>MediaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=72.64.104.41"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/72.64.104.41"/>
	<updated>2026-07-23T19:56:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Talk:Trademark&amp;diff=282615</id>
		<title>Talk:Trademark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Talk:Trademark&amp;diff=282615"/>
		<updated>2009-04-29T10:51:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;72.64.104.41: /* Comic books */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;It&#039;s a word with a strict dictionary definition, and it doesn&#039;t specifically refer to Transformers, nor is it a fan-coined term like &amp;quot;retool&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;neon.&amp;quot;  Why would it need an article? - [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 05:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Because it&#039;s kind of important to Transformers, since it determines what things are NAMED?  And the &amp;quot;CANT THEY JUST CALL HIM AUTOBOT HOT ROD&amp;quot; continuiously comes up, so having a page that explains why not we can just link to for the various explanations as to the name changes and etc would be quite the handy thing to have? --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 05:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: For the love of God, yes please.  Then I wouldn&#039;t have to explain what trademarks mean in context to Transformers thirty million times a week, instead just linking a URL.  That&#039;s something a dictionary definition certainly won&#039;t give.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 05:22, 17 October 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If it&#039;s so incredibly important and you all seem to know exactly what such an article should contain, then why don&#039;t you actually make it? It&#039;s been on the Most Wanted page for a while. - [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 07:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::We&#039;re hoping our trademark lawyer friend will write it.  He&#039;s just been busy.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 07:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Think this will get him unbusy? ;-)  -[[User:Autobus Prime|Autobus Prime]] 12:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I work in trademarks now. I could have a whack at it if ye like. --[[User:Ratbat|Ratbat]] 10:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is so rad.--[[User:OctopusPrime|Octopus Prime- King of the Road!]] 12:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Ronimus Prime, who is NOT trademarked, concurs.[[User:Ronimus Prime|Ronimus Prime]] 14:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a sidenote, whoever came up with Autobot Carblast gets the Awesome badge. [[User:Nutjob RT|Nutjob RT]] 14:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cleanup tag==&lt;br /&gt;
Quite frankly, I&#039;ve long felt that this article is one of the worst offenders here in terms of sacrificing useful information on the alter of dubious attempts at humor. --[[User:TVsGrady|TVsGrady]] 19:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Fucking Outback Steakhouse. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 03:03, 15 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Well, poop. Always liked this one.--[[User:Chiasaur11|Chiasaur11]]&lt;br /&gt;
::The mighty Carblast is still there. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 16:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The new article is excellent. The old one was actually not a dubious attempt at humor.  This is not because it was brilliant (although it of course was exceedingly brilliant, by the Usual Standards for Such Things) but because it was a dubious attempt at irritating the ever-busy legal types to the point that somebody would actually write a proper article.  I can&#039;t find my d20. --[[User:Autobus Prime|Autobus Prime]] 17:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Convert&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Transform&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Cite me, because that was precisely what I was told when doing the TF movie game guide. Fun Publications is also under this edict. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 05:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Danke. I&#039;m not up on all the wiki-coding stuff yet. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 16:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comic books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What&#039;s with comic book titles? I&#039;m thinking of the Spotlights in particular. Even if one were to argue that IDW doesn&#039;t actually claim the trademark to &amp;quot;Hot Rod&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Drift&amp;quot; etc., and the actual title of all the Spotlight issues is simply &#039;&#039;Transformers: Spotlight&#039;&#039;, as evidenced from the lag of &amp;amp;trade; claims after the individual characters&#039; names, IDW would still have to make sure they don&#039;t collide with other companies&#039; trademarks, right? Because even when they don&#039;t consider the names trademarks from a to-be-defended standpoint, they&#039;d still need to make sure another company doesn&#039;t either, since those flashy, artistic renditions of the names sure do &#039;&#039;look&#039;&#039; like something that might be considered a trademark. Thoughts?--[[User:Nevermore|Nevermore]] 06:39, 29 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Book titles are a completely different animal. IDW doesn&#039;t need to worry about the name of the guy in a spotlight issue anymore than Marvel needed to worry about &amp;quot;End of the Road!&amp;quot; on every every single final issue he&#039;s written. --[[Special:Contributions/72.64.104.41|72.64.104.41]] 06:51, 29 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>72.64.104.41</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>