MediaWiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Units of time/Continuity

2009-09-19T22:38:13Z

76.232.121.144:

Given that, with the degree of precision the definition of an ''Animated'' nanoklik gives (8,589,934,592/9,192,631,770 = 0.9344369281 nanoklicks in a second), can't we go a ''bit'' further than the definitions on this page for that continuity? [FTR, a decacycle is closer to 11 days than 10. And no, I'm not suggesting 13 significant figures, but three or four would be more useful.] - [[User:SanityOrMadness|SanityOrMadness]] 17:42, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
:I love the idea. I made sure all the math worked on all the units, both with what the Marty had in mind and relative to each other. It was fun, defining a [[mechanometer]] in terms of 'how far light travels in a vacuum in a fraction of a nanosec' and whatnot. --[[Special:Contributions/76.232.121.144|76.232.121.144]] 18:37, 19 September 2009 (EDT)

Talk:Units of time/Continuity

2009-09-19T22:37:57Z

76.232.121.144:

Given that, with the degree of precision the definition of an ''Animated'' nanoklik gives (8,589,934,592/9,192,631,770 = 0.9344369281 nanoklicks in a second), can't we go a ''bit'' further than the definitions on this page for that continuity? [FTR, a decacycle is closer to 11 days than 10. And no, I'm not suggesting 13 significant figures, but three or four would be more useful.] - [[User:SanityOrMadness|SanityOrMadness]] 17:42, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
:I love the idea. I made sure all the math worked on all the units, both with what the Marty had in mind and in each other. It was fun, defining a [[mechanometer]] in terms of 'how far light travels in a vacuum in a fraction of a nanosec' and whatnot. --[[Special:Contributions/76.232.121.144|76.232.121.144]] 18:37, 19 September 2009 (EDT)