MediaWiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Stephen Baskerville

2011-10-21T21:18:34Z

85.210.51.187:

One of the outside links has an issue-by-issue bibliography for his US Marvel work. Anyone have any ideas if anyone has anything similar for over the pond?

Is it worth mentioning how utterly dependant Andy Wildman is on this guy?

Talk:Transformers: The Ultimate Guide

2011-10-21T16:20:13Z

85.210.51.187: /* Italics */

==Excluding RID stories==
The info about Saban and Disney is all correct. However, I recall that convention reports from Auto Assembly, posted to ATT and Allspark, reported Furman saying he would have cut RID anyway--either because he didn't like it, or because assorted short stuff had to be pruned to allow more room for the then-upcoming Energon, or both. Can anyone clear that up?--[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 18:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:Bit o' digging dug [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/5ce0bb3b94e7f91f?&hl=en&q=furman+auto+assembly+book+panel this up]. And I quote:
::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Thank you. That burns, but I was asking for it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

== 2nd Edition ==

What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

:The Dreamwave section became "Dreamwave and IDW," and two double-page spreads were added - one for IDW's G1 universe, and one for their other projects. After that, without any kind of setion header to separate them out, just tacking them on at the end of the book, were a double-page on Alternators, and a double-page on Classics. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 19:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

== Italics ==

Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.
::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)
:::I found four, three of them in the "Editorial priorities" section. The single word one in the third paragraph of that section is hard to see. While 4 is still a small number, having 3 instances that close together is kind of much. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 11:54, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

::::''No'', it's not ''enough''. Everyone,'' but'' everyone, ''reading'' this ''Wiki'' is a ''complete'' moron totally ''unable'' to work out '''if''' something is stupid'' from'' mere text.

"This approach goes so far as to claim that the cartoon's Quintesson-creation origin for the Transformers is entirely conjectural—when talking solely about the cartoon!" is completely meaningless. I have no ''idea'' how strange and ''bizarre'' that situation is from just ''the'' words used and my ''own'' brain. "This approach goes so far as to claim that the cartoon's Quintesson-creation origin for the Transformers is entirely conjectural — ''when talking solely about the cartoon''!" ''lets'' me know exactly ''what'' the score ''is''.

Talk:Transformers: The Ultimate Guide

2011-10-21T15:38:06Z

85.210.51.187: /* Italics */ new section