<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=87.164.127.116</id>
	<title>MediaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=87.164.127.116"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/87.164.127.116"/>
	<updated>2026-07-23T17:11:38Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Trademark&amp;diff=300213</id>
		<title>Trademark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Trademark&amp;diff=300213"/>
		<updated>2009-05-24T21:29:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;87.164.127.116: /* Hasbro */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Aniarrival04 tifof trademark.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Silly Porter C. Powell, you can&amp;amp;#39;t copyright a name! You&amp;amp;#39;re thinking of a Trademark!]]&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;trademark&#039;&#039;&#039; is a name, phrase or symbol used by a company to distinguish their goods or services from those of other companies in a similar range, preventing &amp;quot;brand confusion&amp;quot;. Trademarks are indicated by a ™ symbol, or in the case of &#039;&#039;&#039;registered trademarks&#039;&#039;&#039;, a ® symbol. [[Hasbro]]&#039;s ability to legally secure a trademark dictates what proper nouns they will use to describe a toy, gimmick, or line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is &#039;&#039;not&#039;&#039; the same thing as [[copyright]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hasbro does not strictly &#039;&#039;need&#039;&#039; to claim trademarks for the character names applied to individual toys. Some toy companies do not claim them, though this is most often in the case of short-lived licensed lines based on movies or video games. But, Hasbro values the advantages of maintaining established characters (or character types) in the long term, and they wish to be able to hold exclusive claim to those names and use them as long as possible without fear of litigation from or loss to another company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trademark law is full of gray areas and complexity; otherwise lawyers couldn&#039;t charge exorbitant sums for their services in that field. The whims of the judges who look at the cases also play into the end results. However, there are guidelines and general rules that can explain why items end up named like they do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{note|This article deals with how trademark affects Hasbro product in the United States. Trademark law varies from country to country, and [[TakaraTomy]] has different naming practices because of this. For the longest time, it seemed like they had a general lack of worry about protecting individual character names; however, that appears to have changed in more recent years, with &amp;quot;Cybertron&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Destron&amp;quot; prefixes also popping up more frequently.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trademark basics==&lt;br /&gt;
Trademarks are categorized into groups of products/services, so when a company applies for a trademark, lawyers compare them to similar marks within the same category, not across all products ever. &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toys fall under &#039;&#039;&#039;International Class 28, &amp;quot;Toys and Sporting Goods.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name &amp;quot;[[Bumblebee (disambiguation)|Bumblebee]]&amp;quot; provides an illustration of how these categories work: during the time Hasbro was unable to mark a &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toy named &amp;quot;Bumblebee&amp;quot; (see &amp;quot;notable cases&amp;quot;, below), Hasbro licensee [[Fun-4-All]] was able to release a keychain named Bumblebee, because keychains are not categorized as &amp;quot;Toys and Sporting Goods&amp;quot;. Similarly, the character of Bumblebee could be referred to by that name within a comic book, since the comic company was not actually claiming it as a trademark within that field. If they were to release a comic &#039;&#039;series&#039;&#039; titled &amp;quot;Bumblebee&amp;quot;, though, a trademark search and claim for comics would have been needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is also why there can be car batteries with &amp;quot;[[Megatron (disambiguation)|Megatron]]&amp;quot; as a brand name, despite having no connection to Hasbro or &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039;. Hasbro does not make car batteries or anything along the lines of automobile parts, so the odds of &amp;quot;brand confusion&amp;quot; are exceedingly remote, making the battery-maker safe from litigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, companies that own character-based Intellectual Property (IP) will apply for trademarks across a vast swath of categories to maximize the range of product on which they can use that name. Around the time of &#039;&#039;[[Robots in Disguise (franchise)|Robots in Disguise]]&#039;&#039;, Konami brought the wildly successful Japanese collectible card game franchise &#039;&#039;Yu-Gi-Oh!&#039;&#039; to the US. Among the trademarks they applied for across multiple categories was &amp;quot;Space Megatron,&amp;quot; the name of one of the game cards (called simply &amp;quot;Megatron&amp;quot; in Japan). Some [[Fandom|fans]], upon hearing this, believed that Hasbro was in danger of losing the &amp;quot;Megatron&amp;quot; trademark.  However, since Hasbro had made steady and repeated use of the name over the course of the previous decade ([[Megatron (G1) toys|over a dozen toys branded “Megatron”]] between 1990 and 2001, plus media association thanks to five years of the name belonging to a central villain of the associated TV shows), this seems unlikely.  The card in question did end up being called &amp;quot;Space Megatron&amp;quot; because at the time that Konami applied for that trademark, Hasbro did not have any &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; trading or playing cards and thus could not contest the claim in that field.  However, no &amp;quot;Megatron&amp;quot; toys were produced in association with the &#039;&#039;Yu-Gi-Oh&#039;&#039; brand. Still, Hasbro ultimately didn&#039;t manage to successfully register the name &amp;quot;Megatron&amp;quot; until 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|How foolish is it that some other beings in the multiverse have stolen my name?|[[Megatron (Armada)|Megatron]]|[[What Lies Beneath, Part Three|Energon #22]] (letters page)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relevance==&lt;br /&gt;
===Brand recognition===&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, Hasbro didn&#039;t put as much emphasis on outstanding characters for the &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toy line from a marketing standpoint as they do today. Toys were supposed to have a shelf life of two years at maximum, to be replaced by new toys, which would be entirely new characters. With the exception of [[Galvatron (G1)|Galvatron]] (only in the cartoon and comic fiction) and [[Goldbug]], all the new-toy line-ups from 1985 through 1987 were entirely new characters (not counting variants or reuses of existing sculpts, such as the [[Targetmaster]] versions of [[Hot Rod (G1)|Hot Rod]], [[Cyclonus (G1)|Cyclonus]] etc.), as were most of the [[Pretender|Pretenders]] and all of the [[Micromaster|Micromasters]] released by Hasbro. As a consequence, Hasbro only bothered to register a small number of trademarks in the 1980s, such as &amp;quot;[[Optimus Prime (G1)|Optimus Prime]]&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;[[Soundwave (G1)|Soundwave]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hasbro didn&#039;t originally realize how much of a crucial part recognizable characters had played in the success of the original &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; series, until they were facing the viewer backlash following Optimus Prime&#039;s death in &#039;&#039;[[The Transformers: The Movie]]&#039;&#039;. As a consequence, the first entirely new &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toy to be released under the name of an older toy intended to represent the same character was the [[Powermaster]] version of Optimus Prime in 1988, followed by the [[Classic Pretender]] versions of [[Bumblebee (G1)|Bumblebee]], [[Grimlock (G1)|Grimlock]], [[Jazz (G1)|Jazz]] and [[Starscream (G1)|Starscream]] in 1989. Following that, about half of the [[Action Master]] line-up in 1990 consisted of &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot; characters from the 1984-85 toy line-up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since then, Hasbro have been putting more emphasis on recognizable characters in all their &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; lines (although &#039;&#039;[[Beast Wars (franchise)|Beast Wars]]&#039;&#039; put it to a stretch with modified names such as &amp;quot;[[Optimus Primal]]&amp;quot; and numerous characters sporting the names of older &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toys, but not sharing any other similarities with those characters beyond the name).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Market situation===&lt;br /&gt;
Hasbro wasn&#039;t the only company slowly coming to realize the importance of recognizable, &amp;quot;iconic&amp;quot; characters, however: Similar discoveries were made by competing companies at the same time. Since &amp;quot;characters&amp;quot; were no longer considered easily replaced throwaway elements of toy lines, companies began to put a stronger focus on developing, emphasizing and defending their intellectual properties—which included the characters&#039; individual names: For comparison, back in the 1980s, it was possible for both [[Hasbro]] and [[Tonka]] to have toys named [[Blaster (G1)|Blaster]] and [[Rumble (G1)|Rumble]] in their respective &#039;&#039;[[The Transformers (toyline)|Transformers]]&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;[[Tonka GoBots|GoBots]]&#039;&#039; toy lines at the same time, without either company bothering to cause any legal problems with the other one. Likewise, Hasbro were able to release a [[Constructicon (G1)|Constructicon]] named [[Scrapper (G1)|Scrapper]] in 1985 even though Tomy&#039;s US branch had registered the name as a trademark that same year (Tomy was still separate from [[Takara]] at that time).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to that, toy companies enforce their trademarks a lot more rigidly these days. As a consequence, Hasbro&#039;s lawyers have become a lot more conservative, objecting the use of any names they fear &#039;&#039;might&#039;&#039; interfere with another company&#039;s trademark. This has resulted in quite a few names becoming &amp;quot;off limits&amp;quot; for any further use as part of a &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toy line, at least until the other company decides to abandon the name in question. In return, Hasbro have also performed several not-so-nice maneuvers to seize a trademark in order to prevent their competitor Bandai from introducing certain toy lines on the US market under their original names, such as &amp;quot;Machine Robo Rescue&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Crush Gear&amp;quot;. Furthermore, Hasbro&#039;s legal department also prefers to modify certain names in order to make them easier to defend in court... since Hasbro wouldn&#039;t want one of their competitors to release a toy under a name so similar to a &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toy&#039;s that it could easily cause confusion on behalf of the customers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Protection and loss==&lt;br /&gt;
Once a trademark is claimed, legal protection of that mark hinges primarily on usage.  A company cannot defend a trademark that they never actually use.  Protection of a trademark in the action figure world typically lasts roughly a year, though this (like most anything involving trademark law) is not ironclad. ([[#BumblebeeCase|See &amp;quot;notable cases&amp;quot; below.]]) The longer and more frequently a company uses a trademark (&amp;quot;consistent use&amp;quot;), the stronger their case becomes to retain ownership of it should it be contested by a competitor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Registered trademarks are a stronger level of protection, thanks to a more involved process (and some more fees): With a standard trademark claim (&amp;amp;trade;), a company that feels that another company is infringing on one of their trademarks needs to &#039;&#039;actively&#039;&#039; prove that they have used the trademark (preferably consistently) if they want to take legal action against their competitor. With a registered trademark (&amp;amp;reg;), on the other hand, that process becomes somewhat automated: A company regularly needs to provide the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) with evidence of consistent use of the trademark in question anyway in order to guarantee continued registration—otherwise, the USPTO will consider the trademark &amp;quot;abandoned&amp;quot; and cancel the registration. If &#039;&#039;that&#039;&#039; company now feels another company is infringing on one of their their trademarks, the burden of proof of consistent use has become automated, and they have an 800–pound gorilla (i.e. the USPTO) backing them up on their case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note, however, that even registered trademarks are not by any means absolute protection: Even a registered trademark can be lost due to lack of use (abandonment) or a successful challenge from another company. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Descriptive trademarks===&lt;br /&gt;
Defensibility is also determined by the name itself and its distinctive qualities regarding to what it’s being applied. One could not reasonably expect to claim trademark of &amp;quot;Apple&amp;quot; as a product name for apples. But for, say, computers, which would not otherwise be referred to as an &amp;quot;apple&amp;quot;, that works. In regards to toys and &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Car&amp;quot; would be basically impossible to defend successfully as a distinct trademark. &amp;quot;Carblast&amp;quot;, however, is fairly strong, being a made-up compound word highly unlikely to be used elsewhere. &amp;quot;Autobot Carblast&amp;quot; is even more defensible, thanks to the addition of a clearly nonsensical word, which is &#039;&#039;by itself&#039;&#039; very strong, like &amp;quot;[[Rodimus (disambiguation)|Rodimus]]&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;[[Cybertron (disambiguation)|Cybertron]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Hasbro has been shoring up some of their infrequently-used &amp;quot;common word&amp;quot; names in recent years by adding prefixes (such as &amp;quot;Autobot [[Tracks (G1)|Tracks]]&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Decepticon [[Frenzy (disambiguation)|Frenzy]]&amp;quot;), fans sometimes mistake this to mean that reclaiming a trademark from another company is as simple as writing a faction name in front of it.  This is &#039;&#039;not true&#039;&#039;. If it were, then a competitor such as [[Bandai]] could release a line of robot toys called &amp;quot;Megazord Transformers&amp;quot; with an &amp;quot;Optimus Prime Zord&amp;quot; toy and get away with it.  Hasbro&#039;s addition of extra words to these old names is primarily to strengthen the claim to a name that is currently (likely) uncontested and Hasbro is likely to try and use often in the future.  It is also the case that the names Hasbro has reinforced in this way are all real English words, not made-up words.  Real words are harder to defend as a trademark than [[Blastification|nonsense words]].  Adding nonsense to a real word makes it more defensible, but adding nonsense to somebody else&#039;s active trademark is only asking for trouble.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on some of Hasbro&#039;s naming choices, it could be argued that the strategy of Hasbro&#039;s IP lawyers is  somewhat conservative or cautious.  They may be able to defend more than they try to defend, but they choose not to take that risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Genericized trademarks===&lt;br /&gt;
Trademarks can also be lost by allowing a term to become a &amp;quot;[[wikipedia:genericized_trademark|genericized trademark]]&amp;quot; — effectively, letting their mark become a common term, like &amp;quot;aspirin&amp;quot; for acetylsalicylic acid.  Aspirin was once a trademarked brand name controlled by Bayer, but in a 1921 court case it was ruled that the name had become genericized and could be used by all manufacturers of acetylsalicylic acid.  Note that this applies to the US. Whilst &amp;quot;aspirin&amp;quot; is also a genericized word in the UK, in other countries it is still a protected trademark and other producers of acetylsalicylic acid must use a different term. The status of a trademarked word in one country often has little bearing on its use in other jurisdictions. Other brand names that have become genericized include &amp;quot;thermos&amp;quot; for vacuum flasks (genericized in the USA in 1963), &amp;quot;linoleum&amp;quot; for floor covering, and &amp;quot;zipper&amp;quot; for a method of fastening fabric. Brand names that are also in danger of becoming genericized (but are currently still protected as trademarks) include &amp;quot;Kleenex&amp;quot; for facial tissues, &amp;quot;Jell-o&amp;quot; for processed, gelatinized pig hooves, &amp;quot;Xerox&amp;quot; for photocopies, and &amp;quot;Google&amp;quot; for computer searches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Productdoesnotconvert.jpg|left|200px|thumb|Product also does not xerox, kleenex, or jello.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, Hasbro has realized that using the word &amp;quot;transform&amp;quot; as a verb to describe the [[Transformation|process of changing a &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toy from one mode into another one]] would make the brand name &amp;quot;Transformers&amp;quot; descriptive, making the mark indefensible. The end result would have been a loss of the mark &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; as a registered trademark, allowing competitors to use the term &amp;quot;transformer&amp;quot; as a generic term for &#039;&#039;their&#039;&#039; shape-shifting robot toys and thus creating further confusion among parents when asked to buy a &#039;&#039;Transformer&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence, Hasbro has implemented various methods of preventing this. For example, use of &amp;quot;transform&amp;quot; as a verb when being used to describe product is almost strictly forbidden in certain written materials&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greg Sepelak]], author of the [[Transformers The Game|&#039;&#039;Transformers The Game&#039;&#039;]] strategy guide from [[BradyGames]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: If it&#039;s a toy that &amp;quot;converts&amp;quot;, Hasbro can argue that &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; is not merely a descriptive term, thus allowing for trademark protection to persist. Although this mandate does not extend to character dialogue within fiction, synonyms like &amp;quot;convert&amp;quot; (or simply &amp;quot;change&amp;quot;) are used in Hasbro&#039;s own products (like packaging [[Call-out|call-outs]] and instructions) and in licensees&#039; products (such as game guides).&lt;br /&gt;
{{-}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The international market===&lt;br /&gt;
Since Hasbro is a company rooted in the United States, the focus of trademarks is also naturally on the United States market. Unlike in the early 1990s, when name [[variant]]s were abundant across the various international (particularly European) markets—especially when the [[The Transformers (toyline)|&#039;&#039;Generation 1&#039;&#039; toyline]] had been cancelled in the USA, but was still being continued with all-new toys in Europe and other places—Hasbro now aim for a uniform brand representation. In other words, a toy has the same name in every country it&#039;s released in by Hasbro (thus making Japanese names an anomaly). However, that could mean a toy that can&#039;t be released by Hasbro under its originally intended name in the USA (because another company is already using the trademark), but could easily be released under that name in the United Kingdom, will still be released under the substitute name chosen for the US market everywhere in the world, because it&#039;s easier to manage than individual names for individual markets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In theory, however, this could also backfire: A toy&#039;s name that has been cleared for use in the USA by Hasbro&#039;s legal department might conflict with another company&#039;s trademark in another country. This &#039;&#039;has&#039;&#039; actually happened back in 1985, when Hasbro/[[Milton Bradley]] introduced the &#039;&#039;Generation 1&#039;&#039; toyline on the European market: A Dutch manufacturer of kitchen utensils held the trademark for &amp;quot;Optimus&amp;quot; and reportedly caused problems with name [[Optimus Prime (G1) toys|Optimus Prime]], initially resulting in MB holding back the release of the Optimus Prime toy and declaring [[Jetfire (G1)|Jetfire]] the leader of the Autobots instead. (The conflict was eventually settled, and the Optimus Prime toy released.) Note, however, that this is a rather unusual case: In general, European trademark law is a lot less rigid than it is in the USA, and Hasbro generally refrain from using any trademark claims after names on their international packaging, because that would require them to actively try to defend those trademarks in &#039;&#039;every single country&#039;&#039; they release those toys in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although there are no known recent examples of &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toys that couldn&#039;t be released in specific countries for &#039;&#039;trademark&#039;&#039; reasons, there is at least one case where the intention to release a toy on other markets &#039;&#039;did&#039;&#039; affect the &#039;&#039;United States&#039;&#039; name of the toy: For the [[Transformers Animated (toyline)|&#039;&#039;Animated&#039;&#039; toyline]], Hasbro registered the name [[Snarl (Animated)|Slag]], in homage to the [[Slag (G1)|&#039;&#039;Generation 1&#039;&#039; character of the same name]]. Even though the trademark was never opposed, and Hasbro renewed it as recently as Christmas of 2007, they were eventually informed that &amp;quot;[[Slag (slang)|slag]]&amp;quot; was considered a slur word not only in &#039;&#039;[[Beast Wars (cartoon)|Beast Wars]]&#039;&#039;, but also in the United Kingdom. As a consequence, Hasbro decided to change the toy&#039;s name into &amp;quot;Snarl&amp;quot;, and released it under that name on all worldwide markets, including the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Names that require(d) prefixes or suffixes==&lt;br /&gt;
===Hasbro===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Blades]]: Autobot Blades&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Blaster (G1)|Blaster]]: Autobot Blaster&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brawl]]: Decepticon Brawl&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bruticus (disambiguation)|Bruticus]]: Predacon Bruticus, Bruticus Maximus&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Camshaft]]: Autobot Camshaft&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cosmos]]: Autobot Cosmos&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Devastator (disambiguation)|Devastator]]: Constructicon Devastator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Drag Strip]]: Decepticon Drag Strip&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dropshot (disambiguation)|Dropshot]]: Decepticon Dropshot&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fracture]]: Decepticon Fracture&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frenzy (disambiguation)|Frenzy]]: Decepticon Frenzy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grapple]]: Autobot Grapple (misspelled as &amp;quot;Auotbot Grapple&amp;quot; in several places on the &#039;&#039;[[Commemorative Series]]&#039;&#039; reissue&#039;s packaging)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Groove (disambiguation)|Groove]]: Autobot Groove&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heavy Load (disambiguation)|Heavy Load]]: Decepticon Heavy Load&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hot Spot (disambiguation)|Hot Spot]]: Autobot Hot Zone (the ultimate real &amp;quot;Autobot Carblast&amp;quot; case - renaming &amp;quot;Hot Spot&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;Hot Zone&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039; adding an &amp;quot;Autobot&amp;quot; prefix) used only once, the [[Titanium Series]] figure is simply named &amp;quot;Hot Zone&amp;quot;, without prefix&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hound]]: Autobot Hound&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jazz (disambiguation)|Jazz]]: Autobot Jazz&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Primus]]: Cybertron Primus (exceptional since it has never been used as a Transformers toy&#039;s name before)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ratchet (disambiguation)|Ratchet]]: Autobot Ratchet&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ravage (G1)|Ravage]]: Battle Ravage, Command Ravage (both abandoned, back to simply &amp;quot;Ravage&amp;quot; since 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reverb (Movie)|Reverb]]: Decepticon Reverb (for the unreleased [[Movie (toyline)|Movie]] Scout, only two years after a [[Reverb (Cybertron)|toy]] using the name without a prefix was released)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rumble]]: Decepticon Rumble&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roadbuster]]: Autobot Roadbuster&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scrapper (disambiguation)|Scrapper]]: Decepticon Scrapper&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Skids (disambiguation)|Skids]]: Autobot Skids&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tarantulas]]: Predacon Tarantulus (using the spelling &amp;quot;Tarantul&#039;&#039;&#039;u&#039;&#039;&#039;s&amp;quot; only once), Predacon Tarantulas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tracks (G1)|Tracks]]: Autobot Tracks&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Whirl]]: Autobot Whirl&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wheelie (G1)|Wheelie]]: Autobot Wheelie&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===TakaraTomy===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bluestreak|Streak]]: Cybertron Streak&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cheetor (BW)|Cheetas]]: Cybertron Cheetas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hot Shot (Armada)|Hot Rod]]: Cybertron Hot Rod&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inferno (disambiguation)|Inferno]]: Cybertron Inferno&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Octane|Octone]]: Destron Octone&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Perceptor (disambiguation)|Perceptor]]: Cybertron Perceptor&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Slingshot|Sling]]: Cybertron Sling&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vortex (G1)|Vorter]]: Destron Vorter&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wildrider]]: Stuntron Wildrider&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable/unusual cases==&lt;br /&gt;
{{note|This is not a list of every lost &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; trademark ever, just some instances with unusual or interesting twists.}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;BumblebeeCase&amp;quot;&amp;gt;As mentioned above, &amp;quot;Bumblebee&amp;quot; was unavailable to Hasbro for many years.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; The name was being used as a registered trademark by a company called Playcore for their &amp;quot;Buzz the Bumble Bee&amp;quot; swing as of 2003, and as Hasbro had not used the name for a toy since 1995, their case to contest was likely a weak one. The &#039;&#039;[[Super Collection Figure|Heroes of Cybertron]]&#039;&#039; PVC two-pack with [[Spike Witwicky (G1)|Spike Witwicky]] was officially named &amp;quot;Autobot Espionage Team&amp;quot; for that reason, although the [[bio]] on the back of the packaging identified the two characters as &amp;quot;Bumblebee&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Spike&amp;quot; (but without claiming them as trademarks). However, in March 2005, Hasbro tried to reclaim the trademark, due to its intended association with a principal character in the [[Transformers (2007)|big-deal live-action movie]] and its associated merchandise planned across a great many categories. However, the registration attempt was contested in July 2005, both by a production company named &amp;quot;Bumble Bee Productions, Inc.&amp;quot; and by an online toy retailer named &amp;quot;Bumblebee Toys&amp;quot;, both of which argued that the mark, as it was filed under the &amp;quot;toys&amp;quot; field, was too close to their own registered marks. Ultimately, Hasbro abandoned the registration attempt for &amp;quot;Bumblebee&amp;quot; in 2006 and simply decided to use the name as a &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot;, non-registered trademark instead. The movie&#039;s release date being pushed back a year meant that the first &amp;quot;Bumblebee&amp;quot;-branded &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; toys in over a decade were a 3&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;[[Titanium Series]]&#039;&#039; figure and a toy from the &#039;&#039;[[Classics (2006)|Classics]]&#039;&#039; line. (Playcore, or more accurately, its subsidiary Swing-N-Slide no longer manufactures the &amp;quot;Buzz the Bumble Bee&amp;quot; swingset.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.drillspot.com/products/291165/Swing-N-Slide_NE_4541_Buzz_Bumble_Bee_Swing Retailer site] mentioning the discontinuation.  Also, said swing is no longer visible/available on Swing-N-Slide&#039;s official site.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Bluestreak]]&amp;quot; is one of the most infamous cases of a name of a classic character being unavailable to Hasbro, since a company named Gendron, Inc. registered the name &amp;quot;Toledo &#039;Blue Streak&#039;&amp;quot; in 2002. All toys based on the &#039;&#039;[[The Transformers (toyline)|Generation 1]]&#039;&#039; Bluestreak character released since then are officially named &amp;quot;Silverstreak&amp;quot; instead. (Note that this does only affect Hasbro; while the character is traditionally known as simply &amp;quot;Streak&amp;quot; in Japan, [[TakaraTomy]] have recently released a blue [[redeco]] of the &#039;&#039;[[Alternators (toyline)|Binaltech]]&#039;&#039; Streak toy, named &amp;quot;Bluestreak&amp;quot;.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Next to Bluestreak, &amp;quot;[[Hot Rod (G1)|Hot Rod]]&amp;quot; is the most well-known case of a name unavailable to Hasbro. Mattel has registered various &amp;quot;confusingly similar&amp;quot; trademarks over the years, among them &amp;quot;Ho! Ho! Hot Rod&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Hot Rods&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Hott Rodd&amp;quot;. Hasbro&#039;s original substitute name for the &#039;&#039;[[Commemorative Series]]&#039;&#039; line of reissues was &amp;quot;Rodimus Major&amp;quot;, whereas the current, less clunky alternative is simply &amp;quot;Rodimus&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Shockwave (G1)|Shockwave]]&amp;quot; was temporarily lost to a company named Lanard Toys, Ltd—who actually used it in their &#039;&#039;The Corps!&#039;&#039; military figure series, direct competitors to Hasbro&#039;s [[G.I. Joe]].  An &#039;&#039;[[Energon (toyline)|Energon]]&#039;&#039; toy designed as an homage to &#039;&#039;Generation 1&#039;&#039; Shockwave was named &amp;quot;[[Shockblast (Energon)|Shockblast]]&amp;quot; instead, as was the &#039;&#039;[[Alternators (toyline)|Alternators]]&#039;&#039; toy. However, Lanard had abandoned the registration for the &amp;quot;Shockwave&amp;quot; trademark shortly prior to the release of the &#039;&#039;Alternators&#039;&#039; toy (too late to change the name on the packaging), so Hasbro seized the opportunity and slapped the name onto the next available [[Shockwave (Cybertron)|Mini-Con]] just to claim it back. They have since been able to use it for [[Shockwave (Animated)|other toys]] more closely based on the &#039;&#039;Generation 1&#039;&#039; character. Ironically, a figure from Hasbro&#039;s &#039;&#039;[[G.I. Joe]] 25th Anniversary&#039;&#039; line based on an older figure from 1988 named [http://www.yojoe.com/action/88/shockwave.shtml &amp;quot;Shockwave&amp;quot;] was relased under the name [http://www.yojoe.com/action/08/shockblast.shtml &amp;quot;Shockblast&amp;quot;] in 2008, presumably in an attempt to avoid brand confusion. Apparently, Hasbro consider the name &amp;quot;Shockwave&amp;quot; more iconic for the &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; character.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2001, Hasbro trademarked &amp;quot;[[Skyfire (RID)|Skyfire]]&amp;quot; for use in the &#039;&#039;[[Robots in Disguise (franchise)|Robots in Disguise]]&#039;&#039; line. However, at the same time, their competitor Mattel applied for a registered trademark on the name for a vehicle/accessory in their &#039;&#039;Max Steel&#039;&#039; toy line. Without any past usage to call on to contend Mattel&#039;s claim, Hasbro lost the trademark for &amp;quot;Skyfire&amp;quot; to the stronger registered claim within a very short time frame. This resulted in the name &amp;quot;[[Sky Blast]]&amp;quot;, used first on an &#039;&#039;[[Armada (franchise)|Armada]]&#039;&#039; [[Mini-Con]], then for the &#039;&#039;[[Energon (franchise)|Energon]]&#039;&#039; [[Omnicon]] [[Skyblast (Energon)|Skyblast]], who is a clear [[homage]] to the [[Generation 1 (franchise)|Generation 1]] [[The Transformers (cartoon)|cartoon]] character, &amp;quot;[[Jetfire (G1)|Skyfire]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A particularly odd case: During the 1990s, another company held the &amp;quot;[[Sideswipe (disambiguation)|Sideswipe]]&amp;quot; trademark in the &amp;quot;toys&amp;quot; field, even though Hasbro still released [[Sideswipe (G1)|two toys]] using that name as part of the &#039;&#039;[[Generation 2 (toyline)|Generation 2]]&#039;&#039; line (it&#039;s unclear if this resulted in any legal repercussions for Hasbro). When Hasbro finally managed to reclaim the name for the [[Robots in Disguise (toyline)|Robots in Disguise]] line, the name was now parsed as &amp;quot;[[Side Swipe (RID)|Side Swipe]]&amp;quot;, in two words, for whatever reason. The only two toys since then to spell &amp;quot;Sideswipe&amp;quot; as one word again were the [[OTFCC 2003]] [[exclusive]] and the [[Armada (toyline)|&#039;&#039;Armada&#039;&#039;]] [[Side Swipe (Armada)|Super-Con]]. However, the former was referred to as &amp;quot;Side Swipe&amp;quot; when featured as a cross-sell on the packaging for the OTFCC 2003 [[Shadow Striker]]/[[Roulette]] two-pack, whereas a packaging variant for the latter released as part of the &amp;quot;[[The Unicron Battles|Unicron Battles]]&amp;quot; refresh of the &#039;&#039;Armada&#039;&#039; line also saw the name changed to &amp;quot;Side Swipe&amp;quot;. After many years&#039; worth of &amp;quot;Side Swipe&amp;quot; toys, the &#039;&#039;[[Universe (2008 franchise)|2008 Universe]]&#039;&#039; Deluxe toy finally hailed the return of &amp;quot;Sideswipe&amp;quot; (as one word).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, [[Fun Publications]] was forced to change the name of a [[BotCon 2005]] exclusive intended as an homage to &#039;&#039;Generation 1&#039;&#039; [[Outback]] to &amp;quot;Fallback&amp;quot;. The Outback Steakhouse restaurant chain has successfully applied for &amp;quot;Outback&amp;quot; across a &#039;&#039;vast&#039;&#039; number of categories.  Since Hasbro had not used the name for a product since 1993, there seems to be no way for them to wrest control of Outback Steakhouse&#039;s active claim to the mark without heavy modification - the &amp;quot;Outback&amp;quot; name was used for a 2008 exclusive GIJoe figure, as well as a forthcoming limited release, as &amp;quot;Stuart &#039;Outback&#039; Selkirk.&amp;quot;  TFWiki.net then presumes it is only a matter of time until fans start clamoring for a figure of [[Judd Nelson|Judd &amp;quot;Hot Rod&amp;quot; Nelson]], although [[Casey_Kasem#Trivia|Casey &amp;quot;Bluestreak&amp;quot; Kasem]] is still probably out of the question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similar trademark problems affected other items in the BotCon 2005 set: notably, [[Chromia (G1)|Chromia]] began life as [[Moonracer]] until it was discovered Royal Treasury, LLC owned the &amp;quot;[http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;amp;amp;entry=78095736 King Moonracer]&amp;quot; trademark for toys from the [[wikipedia:Rudolph_the_Red-Nosed_Reindeer_(TV_special)#The_Island_of_Misfit_Toys|Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer]] TV special. Unfortunately, Moonracer was already well into production when Fun Publications learned the name was unavailable, and due to the time involved in trademark searches, a suitably appropriate alternative could not be found. This necessitated the use of Chromia — reportedly their &amp;quot;third or fourth choice&amp;quot;, but a name which &#039;&#039;had&#039;&#039; cleared legal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://groups.google.com/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/e39fbfb4b4bd2b3a alt.toys.transformers post] by [[Lanny Lathem]] explaining the Moonracer/Chromia SNAFU.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Brian Savage]] expressed particular vexation with this turn of events at the BotCon 2005 organizer&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* According to Hasbro copy writer [[Forest Lee]] at [[BotCon 2006]], Hasbro&#039;s IP lawyers were initially skittish about using the name &amp;quot;[[Matrix of Leadership]]&amp;quot; on packaging for the 20th Anniversary version of [[Optimus Prime (G1)|Optimus Prime]], as they were unaware of the history of the term &amp;quot;[[Matrix of Leadership|Matrix]]&amp;quot; within the brand, and feared confusion with the franchise surrounding the film, &#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:The_Matrix_(series)|The Matrix]]&#039;&#039;. Although the lawyers were satisfied and allowed &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot; to be used in that instance, it appears that some variation of the term &amp;quot;[[All Spark]]&amp;quot; may supplant &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot; in future &#039;&#039;Transformers&#039;&#039; franchises.  &amp;quot;All Spark&amp;quot; is, of course, an easier mark to defend because — unlike &amp;quot;matrix&amp;quot; — it is a contrived compound word that doesn&#039;t have any other meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Footnotes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Transformers names in other Hasbro lines]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark Trademarks at Wikipedia]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/tmep/1400.htm#_Toc536248429 US Trademark &amp;amp;amp; Patent Office]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tfarchive.com/toys/trademarks/g1_trademarks_intro.php Extensive article about Transformers-related trademarks at TFArchive.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles needing citations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Toys]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>87.164.127.116</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>