Talk:Streetstar

2010-06-20T22:31:12Z

95.148.10.91: New page: Should any mention be made that this Streetstar is not the same character as the Streetstar in Botcon 2010's set? There may be a link to Streetwise's page but its not obvious on Streetstar...

Should any mention be made that this Streetstar is not the same character as the Streetstar in Botcon 2010's set? There may be a link to Streetwise's page but its not obvious on Streetstar's page that Streetwise stole Streetstar's name. [[Special:Contributions/95.148.10.91|95.148.10.91]] 18:31, 20 June 2010 (EDT)

Talk:Cyclonus's Armada (G1)

2010-06-20T22:08:02Z

95.148.10.91: /* Target: 2006 */ new section

Um... "The Sweeps" are in bold, too, and we're looking at at least two or three more, uh, Cycloni being formed behind Cyclonus, so how is the IDW comic adaptation implying that "Armada" is a singular character, exactly?--[[User:MCRG|MCRG]] 00:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

: [[Media:Idwwhoiscyclonus.jpg|I do not see two or three other Cycloni in this image.]] --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 00:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

::Oh, so I'm supposed to be reading that as guys-being-turned-into-Cycloni instead of dead Bombshell and a couple of forming Cycloni? Not... exactly... the clearest thing ever unless you've already seen the movie. --[[User:MCRG|MCRG]] 00:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

:::Yeah, there's Cyclonus, there's another Cyclonus, and then there are two Cyclonus-shaped wireframes. I suppose they could suddenly become Sweeps instead at the last second, but... --[[User:Andrusi|Andrusi]] 00:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
::::It's not the clearest storytelling in the world (by which I mean it's Don art), but those Cyclonus-shaped wireframes are the intermediate forms between Bombshell/Skywarp and Cyclonus/Armada, not individual guys themselves. -[[User:LV|LV]] 01:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't know how relevant this is, but in Five Faces Of Darkness, most notably in part 5, there are PLENTY of Cycloni appearing as the Decepticons attack Cybertron, and during their retreat at the end of the episode. [[User:Detour|Detour]] 15:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't have the Marvel comic adation of TF:TM handy, is the Armada mentioned/seen there? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 02:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

:They're created in the last page of the first issue and the first page of the second, in which we see countless robots being created out of the surface of Unicron's planet mode. We learn about Scourge and his Sweeps, Cyclonus (who is Galvatron's ship), and later we hear about the two and "their subordinates." (SPECIAL TRIVIA: A conehead is seen among the Decepticons thrown out.) --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

::Bah. Someone else can do that. ;). (I find it surprising how frequently I lament not having my TF:TM digitized for quick reference...) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 22:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
:There's also another problem with Five Faces of Darkness. Among the Decepticons Wheelie is running from while carrying the [[transformation cog]], he heads straight for a group of Decepticons which is also composed of Insecticons...including [[Bombshell (G1)|Bombshell]] in the middle. I'd chalk that up to an amination error, but when has anyone ever accepted that? -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 01:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
::Extra insecticons is something I never really fretted, considering.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 01:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

==El Wreckooni==
I'm wondering if it'd be okay to go ahead and note that Wreckers Finale flat-out says who became who (at least, as far as Wreckers is concerned) ''now'' rather than waiting for the month to be up, and in a month putting in the relevant quote, since it's kinda spoilery for a plot point. I dunno. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 16:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
:Whatever it turns out to be, wouldn't it be a similar situation to the Madman/Metrodome DVD profile, being your own interpretation pushed as canon? No offense intended but if the DVD profiles can be so easily ignored, in the interest of objectivity so can your take on it. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 17:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
:::That's why Sipher says "at least, as far as Wreckers is concerned." He's saying that what Wreckers says ultimately doesn't have an influence on the original movie, just that Wreckers presents one possible answer. (Though, really, I'd suggest the original movie already answered that question, and the only reason there's even a debate in the first place is because a few people didn't like the answer presented.) --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 18:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
::I kinda think that an officially published story has priority over obscure DVD profiles. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 17:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
:::The obscure DVDs and their extra content were still official. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 17:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

== Maybe it's just me... ==

I seem to recall a time when this article wasn't an incoherent collection of disconnected facts. -00:49, 13 July 2009 (EDT)

== Army-building note ==

Should we have a note like this in the article?
{{note|While there have been no toys of the Armada released, anyone interested in [[army-building|assembling an Armada]] is not without options! As the Armada are physically identical to Cyclonus, an enterprising fan can purchase multiples of Cyclonus's original 1986 toy, or his [[Universe (2008 toyline)|Universe]] figure, and make pretend.}}
[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 09:59, 1 February 2010 (EST)

== Target: 2006 ==

I like to think that because Skywarp was killed in Target: 2006 by Galvatron, it caused Cyclonus' Armada to never have existed when Galvatron returned to his own time since Skywarp was no longer around to become Cyclonus' Armada. Is there any merit to this? [[Special:Contributions/95.148.10.91|95.148.10.91]] 18:08, 20 June 2010 (EDT)

MediaWiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Streetstar

Talk:Cyclonus's Armada (G1)