Talk:Side Burn (RID)

2012-06-05T06:58:39Z

96.237.137.189: /* Tailgate Erection Sideburn */ new section

Should this be Side Burn (RiD)? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 02:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
: No. All RID pages with tags use "(RID)", or, at least thew should. --[[User:FortMax|FortMax]] 02:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

==Apology==
I'd swear I read somewhere that the dude who designed Side Burn gave an interview where he apologized for making the transformation so godawful ridiculous. Anyone else remember this? [[User:Hooper X|-hx]] 21:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
:No, I remember this too. The same guy designed Armada Red Alert. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 21:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
::The website it was actually posted on is lost to teh interwebs, but the [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/browse_frm/thread/6b06340117d884cf/9df5aed3c56e0de4?hl=en&lnk=st&q=+interview+designer+speedbreaker ATT discussion on the topic] is not. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 22:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Two years later, I do some digging and find [http://www.excite-webtl.jp/world/english/web/?wb_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.takarahobby.com%2Fkaihatsu%2F0312tranceformer%2Findex.html&wb_lp=JAEN&wb_dis=2 this]. It's translated (by Excite, of all things?) so there's a bunch of Engrish, but at least there's a link! [[User:Onslaught Six|Onslaught Six]] 09:33, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
::::And the [http://web.archive.org/web/20040211060932/http://www.toyboxex.com/phorum/read.php?f=3&i=178&t=178 original forum post] linked in the ATT discussion (via Archive.org). [[User:Onslaught Six|Onslaught Six]] 09:38, 18 March 2010 (EDT)

==Shattered Glass?==

Why is the SG Side Burn listed here? I get that there's obviously something mysterious about the guy, but isn't saying SG Side Burn IS RiD Side Burn arriving in this dimension after the Unicron Singularity a bit of a stretch without, you know, proof? --[[User:Xaaron|Xaaron]] 13:52, 1 January 2010 (EST)
:We do have one of the SG authors as an active editor, so I've always been willing to assume that our reasoning is thus either correct or the matter's supposed to be intentionally ambiguous (in which case we might as well go with an explanation that fits the tendency for the FunPub continuity to be all interconnected). --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 17:00, 4 January 2010 (EST)
::Or I'm being a bastard. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 18:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)
:::I figured that possibility was covered by "intentionally ambigious". --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 19:09, 4 January 2010 (EST)

==New toy==
I am fairly certain his Timelines toy will be a, y'know, Primax/G1 Side Burn. He's gotta get his story told in the club comic, after all, and we know for a fact that the club comic is stuck in WOHverse for several years. Plus we were told that the next few exclusives were part of the same story, and I don't see a universe-hopping RID dude being part of it. I *guess* it's possible that he hops on over from SG or whatever, but it doesn't seem very likely. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 22:30, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
:I think you're probably right. Especially since I could swear Pete said there's not going to be any dimension-hopping in this 3-year arc outside of that one bit of finishing off Nexus Prime's thing. Still, guess it couldn't hurt to wait and see what the fiction brings. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 12:58, 2 July 2010 (EDT)
::It´'s been confirmed today that the new Side Burn is a G1 guy (from the Wings continuity) in addition to being part of the Elite Guard. But since RID is G1 in Japan, I'm a little confused. However, Side Burn (G1) as a page must exist.-[[User:ACIDSTORM92|ACIDSTORM92]] 19:49, 1 October 2010 (EDT)

== Tailgate Erection Sideburn ==

Why is his "boner mode" not shown here? We all know about it.

MediaWiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Side Burn (RID)