Talk:C.H.U.G.

2012-07-11T00:02:09Z

99.194.140.156:

Do we need this? Is this term really that widely used? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 11:17, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
:No and no. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 11:28, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
::I see it used a lot, otherwise I wouldn't have created it.--[[User:MistaTee|MistaTee]] 13:37, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
:::It's used quite a lot, though it's usually "CHUG". --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 13:44, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
::::Yeah, it's near impossible to not see the term CHUG used in a discussion about the Classics/Universe/Henkei Henkei/Generations aesthetic. It's pretty dumb, but it's omnipresent on the TF fanboards. [[User:Antimatter|Antimatter]] 14:52, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
:::::That doesn't mean it warrants an article. Terms like "Bayformers" are even more widespread but don't get an article. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 15:24, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
::::::I'd be OK with Bayformers getting an article too. Or maybe all of these should be in article for "Fan terminology" or something?--[[User:MistaTee|MistaTee]] 00:07, 3 June 2011 (EDT)
::::::Not to mention it's already outdated with the presence of ''United'' and Reveal the Shield. It will inevitably be more so when the next "classic" line comes out. "CHUG" is a very transient term, like "Classics 2.0". [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 15:35, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
:::::::And several "Universe" figures used Unicron Trilogy molds. Do those count? If so, how is the "CHUG" aesthetic differentiated from the "UT" aesthetic? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 15:40, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
::::::::I came here to see what the heck people were talking about because I saw a ton of use of the "CHUG" term with no context to indicate what the heck it meant. Rather than "does this need an article?" maybe ask "Is there any reason NOT to have a fan-terminology page with simple bullet-point definitions?" This IS a wiki, after all.

MediaWiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:C.H.U.G.