Talk:Brawn (G1)

2011-01-08T15:17:07Z

99.65.126.137:

Noticed the note about the fandom's disscussion/debate of Brawn's death was just removed. I understand the impulse to do so, but at the same time I question if it might not be better left in. There are other pages motivated by and/or explaining aspects of frequent/repeated fandom debate (FIRRIB and the reverse) and the "Brawn Lives" debate/movement/annoyance IS a recurring and frequent aspect of the fandom. I feel like maybe it should get a mention. Or maybe it belongs on the Fandom page? In some sort of "repeating tropes" section. I don't know. Thoughts? [[User:71.235.142.128|71.235.142.128]] 20:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
:I removed it because I don't care for noting every time the fandom decides to be retarded. Where's the line? Do we include "''Animated'' Swoop was rumored to be a girl because people have no reading comprehension"? "''Energon'' Starscream is a retool of Smokejumper"? Articles like [[Misconceptions and urban legends about Transformers]] are fine; what I don't like is dedicating an entire section in a character's article to fans being in denial.Yedah thats s cool jerkys [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 14:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
::Lampooning of the "Brawn Lives" meme made it into official material, so I think it's worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 15:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
:::It did? A mention is fine then, I suppose. But does the section honestly have to be bigger than his Marvel section and half the size of the cartoon's? [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 15:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
::::No, it doesn't have to be bigger. Because obviously his comic and cartoon sections are not fully-formed yet. If you think they should be longer ''right now'', go ahead and work on them immediately. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 16:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

MediaWiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Brawn (G1)