File talk:Cycle drone with extractor.jpg

I'm not sure what could possibly be done to improve this image. It's a screencap I took from the DVD, cropped the junk out of, and lightened up a bit to make the extractor visible. There is no "better source" as the template asks for. --Steve-o 05:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

You gotta admit, the upper half of the picture is really the only part that is visible. I can't tell if there is one or two Cycle drones there. -- SFH 06:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

What's with all the image artifacts? --FFN 06:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I too see quite a bit of artifacting in the image. --Sntint 07:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I see alot of it. I think this needs to go back to whatever dark image it was before. --FFN 16:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

There is pretty clearly only one drone. I am guessing that what you think might is another drone is the one's lowered left arm. Brightening the image *did* bring out artifacts, but that was the only way to get the extractor clearly visible. Regardless, I invite anybody to try to come up with a better screencap of an extractor showing the full device clearly, preferably with a character for scale. The Image:Jetstorm with extractor.jpg picture Interrobang uploaded is no good because it's so dark. I tried brightening it a little and it ended up looking worse than the Cycle Drone picture, but maybe somebody else is more skilled at that than me. --Steve-o 14:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)