Category talk:Variable gender characters - Revision history

Cyberlink420: Cyberlink420 moved page Category talk:Gender-switch characters to Category talk:Variable gender characters: Category has been moved

2020-12-08T15:59:42Z

Cyberlink420 moved page Category talk:Gender-switch characters to Category talk:Variable gender characters: Category has been moved

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:59, 8 December 2020
(No difference)

Interrobang: No. Do not start this.

2011-08-06T03:01:50Z

No. Do not start this.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 6 August 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)		: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)
	:: I know that, I just said maybe they should have a different sub-category about characters who didn't already have a gender for a while, which is similar. --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 03:52, 19 June 2010 (EDT)		:: I know that, I just said maybe they should have a different sub-category about characters who didn't already have a gender for a while, which is similar. --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 03:52, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

	~~Now... Drag Strip (Animated). Poor Drag Strip XD, 6 August 2011 (EDT)~~

94.178.42.236 at 02:48, 6 August 2011

2011-08-06T02:48:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 6 August 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)		: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)
	:: I know that, I just said maybe they should have a different sub-category about characters who didn't already have a gender for a while, which is similar. --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 03:52, 19 June 2010 (EDT)		:: I know that, I just said maybe they should have a different sub-category about characters who didn't already have a gender for a while, which is similar. --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 03:52, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

			Now... Drag Strip (Animated). Poor Drag Strip XD, 6 August 2011 (EDT)

Ninjabot33 at 07:52, 19 June 2010

2010-06-19T07:52:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:52, 19 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	I think the [[Extreme Competition Team]] and [[Sonar (BW)\|Sonar]] deserve some sort of mention in this category. Maybe as a sub-category (mostly just to fill in the space of there being so little characters in this category). --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 18:59, 18 June 2010 (EDT)		I think the [[Extreme Competition Team]] and [[Sonar (BW)\|Sonar]] deserve some sort of mention in this category. Maybe as a sub-category (mostly just to fill in the space of there being so little characters in this category). --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 18:59, 18 June 2010 (EDT)
	: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)		: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)
			:: I know that, I just said maybe they should have a different sub-category about characters who didn't already have a gender for a while, which is similar. --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 03:52, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 23:03, 18 June 2010

2010-06-18T23:03:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 18 June 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I think the [[Extreme Competition Team]] and [[Sonar (BW)\|Sonar]] deserve some sort of mention in this category. Maybe as a sub-category (mostly just to fill in the space of there being so little characters in this category). --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 18:59, 18 June 2010 (EDT)		I think the [[Extreme Competition Team]] and [[Sonar (BW)\|Sonar]] deserve some sort of mention in this category. Maybe as a sub-category (mostly just to fill in the space of there being so little characters in this category). --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 18:59, 18 June 2010 (EDT)
			: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)

Ninjabot33 at 22:59, 18 June 2010

2010-06-18T22:59:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 18 June 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)		It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

			I think the [[Extreme Competition Team]] and [[Sonar (BW)\|Sonar]] deserve some sort of mention in this category. Maybe as a sub-category (mostly just to fill in the space of there being so little characters in this category). --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 18:59, 18 June 2010 (EDT)

Abates at 00:03, 5 November 2009

2009-11-05T00:03:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 5 November 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	A category is 'useful' when it sorts article into groups that users are interested in. Thus "Category: Characters that share names with locations" is ''not'' useful, and [[:Category: Ninjas]] is useful. The latter is particularly useful because it groups characters who are not otherwise useful. ('Combaticons' may be a valid category, but all of its members are also linked to in the top section of the 'Combaticon' page. Ninjas are more diverse.)		A category is 'useful' when it sorts article into groups that users are interested in. Thus "Category: Characters that share names with locations" is ''not'' useful, and [[:Category: Ninjas]] is useful. The latter is particularly useful because it groups characters who are not otherwise useful. ('Combaticons' may be a valid category, but all of its members are also linked to in the top section of the 'Combaticon' page. Ninjas are more diverse.)

	Frankly as a ''user''? I think "Category: Gender-benders" is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[:Category: Things ~~That Don~~'t ~~Exist~~]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.		Frankly as a ''user''? I think "Category: Gender-benders" is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[:Category:Things that don't exist]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.

	It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)		It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Bluestreak7: dead links, with the obvious exception

2009-08-06T18:34:50Z

dead links, with the obvious exception

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 6 August 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::As to whether this category should exist at all: The fact that some TF characters have been presented as both genders is a multi-faceted phenomenon, says interesting things about people's expectations about gender identity and balance, and is also nigh-unique to the TF brand. (This doesn't happen to G.I. Joe characters, youbetcha.) I think it's worth a category, and may do a page on it some day. [[User:JW\|JW]] 02:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)		:::As to whether this category should exist at all: The fact that some TF characters have been presented as both genders is a multi-faceted phenomenon, says interesting things about people's expectations about gender identity and balance, and is also nigh-unique to the TF brand. (This doesn't happen to G.I. Joe characters, youbetcha.) I think it's worth a category, and may do a page on it some day. [[User:JW\|JW]] 02:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

	A category is 'useful' when it sorts article into groups that users are interested in. Thus ~~[[:~~Category: Characters that share names with locations]] is ''not'' useful, and [[:Category: Ninjas]] is useful. The latter is particularly useful because it groups characters who are not otherwise useful. ('Combaticons' may be a valid category, but all of its members are also linked to in the top section of the 'Combaticon' page. Ninjas are more diverse.)		A category is 'useful' when it sorts article into groups that users are interested in. Thus "Category: Characters that share names with locations" is ''not'' useful, and [[:Category: Ninjas]] is useful. The latter is particularly useful because it groups characters who are not otherwise useful. ('Combaticons' may be a valid category, but all of its members are also linked to in the top section of the 'Combaticon' page. Ninjas are more diverse.)

	Frankly as a ''user''? I think ~~[[:~~Category: Gender-benders]] is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[:Category: Things That Don't Exist]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.		Frankly as a ''user''? I think "Category: Gender-benders" is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[:Category: Things That Don't Exist]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.

	It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)		It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-26T02:12:03Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 26 March 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Frankly as a ''user''? I think [[:Category: Gender-benders]] is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[:Category: Things That Don't Exist]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.		Frankly as a ''user''? I think [[:Category: Gender-benders]] is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[:Category: Things That Don't Exist]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.

	It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Steve-o: fixing Derik's category stuff

2007-12-10T03:51:20Z

fixing Derik's category stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:51, 10 December 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::As to whether this category should exist at all: The fact that some TF characters have been presented as both genders is a multi-faceted phenomenon, says interesting things about people's expectations about gender identity and balance, and is also nigh-unique to the TF brand. (This doesn't happen to G.I. Joe characters, youbetcha.) I think it's worth a category, and may do a page on it some day. [[User:JW\|JW]] 02:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)		:::As to whether this category should exist at all: The fact that some TF characters have been presented as both genders is a multi-faceted phenomenon, says interesting things about people's expectations about gender identity and balance, and is also nigh-unique to the TF brand. (This doesn't happen to G.I. Joe characters, youbetcha.) I think it's worth a category, and may do a page on it some day. [[User:JW\|JW]] 02:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

	A category is 'useful' when it sorts article into groups that users are interested in. Thus [[Category: Characters that share names with locations]] is ''not'' useful, and [[Category: Ninjas]] is useful. The latter is particularly useful because it groups characters who are not otherwise useful. ('Combaticons' may be a valid category, but all of its members are also linked to in the top section of the 'Combaticon' page. Ninjas are more diverse.)		A category is 'useful' when it sorts article into groups that users are interested in. Thus [[:Category: Characters that share names with locations]] is ''not'' useful, and [[:Category: Ninjas]] is useful. The latter is particularly useful because it groups characters who are not otherwise useful. ('Combaticons' may be a valid category, but all of its members are also linked to in the top section of the 'Combaticon' page. Ninjas are more diverse.)

	Frankly as a ''user''? I think [[Category: Gender-benders]] is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[Category: Things That Don't Exist]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.		Frankly as a ''user''? I think [[:Category: Gender-benders]] is interesting. Just like I like to look through [[:Category: Things That Don't Exist]] to see what diverse characters, concepts and things manage to actually fit under that oddball category.

	It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		It's not a very ''dignified'' category- but it's one of the things people are interested in. If the reason we're not including it is because we don't think it projects the ''image'' we want associated with Transformers... then I have to object. Start deleting Kiss Player articles first-- I don't want people to think that's what tf is about. :( -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:52, 19 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	I think the [[Extreme Competition Team]] and [[Sonar (BW)\|Sonar]] deserve some sort of mention in this category. Maybe as a sub-category (mostly just to fill in the space of there being so little characters in this category). --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 18:59, 18 June 2010 (EDT)		I think the [[Extreme Competition Team]] and [[Sonar (BW)\|Sonar]] deserve some sort of mention in this category. Maybe as a sub-category (mostly just to fill in the space of there being so little characters in this category). --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 18:59, 18 June 2010 (EDT)
	: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)		: If they never had any gender to begin with, it's not a gender switch. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:03, 18 June 2010 (EDT)
			:: I know that, I just said maybe they should have a different sub-category about characters who didn't already have a gender for a while, which is similar. --[[User:Ninjabot33\|Ninjabot33]] 03:52, 19 June 2010 (EDT)