File talk:Arm19 crowningawesome.jpg - Revision history

SanityOrMadness at 17:01, 7 May 2009

2009-05-07T17:01:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 7 May 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:For screencaps capped at full resolution (i.e., >=640×480, like this one), I ''might'' agree with you - they're at least more debatable in that sense. But comic scans tend to be <=72dpi, which I wouldn't call med-to-high-res (150-300dpi+). - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 09:35, 7 May 2009 (EDT)		:For screencaps capped at full resolution (i.e., >=640×480, like this one), I ''might'' agree with you - they're at least more debatable in that sense. But comic scans tend to be <=72dpi, which I wouldn't call med-to-high-res (150-300dpi+). - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 09:35, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
	::Hey, I at least made the template smarter than it used to be by having it trim out portions of the boilerplate text if the source is properly attributed.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:28, 7 May 2009 (EDT)		::Hey, I at least made the template smarter than it used to be by having it trim out portions of the boilerplate text if the source is properly attributed.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:28, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
			:::I'm just curious why there's no ArmadaCap/EnergonCap/CybertronCap templates (and, no, I'm not going to make them. I'm spending more than enough time trying to fix all the Marvel G1/G2 image sourcing right now) - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 13:01, 7 May 2009 (EDT)

Rosicrucian at 14:28, 7 May 2009

2009-05-07T14:28:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 7 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is terrible boilerplate. "Low resolution" indeed! We're not Wikipedia-- our images are mid-to-high. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 21:09, 6 May 2009 (EDT)		This is terrible boilerplate. "Low resolution" indeed! We're not Wikipedia-- our images are mid-to-high. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 21:09, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
	:For screencaps capped at full resolution (i.e., >=640×480, like this one), I ''might'' agree with you - they're at least more debatable in that sense. But comic scans tend to be <=72dpi, which I wouldn't call med-to-high-res (150-300dpi+). - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 09:35, 7 May 2009 (EDT)		:For screencaps capped at full resolution (i.e., >=640×480, like this one), I ''might'' agree with you - they're at least more debatable in that sense. But comic scans tend to be <=72dpi, which I wouldn't call med-to-high-res (150-300dpi+). - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 09:35, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
			::Hey, I at least made the template smarter than it used to be by having it trim out portions of the boilerplate text if the source is properly attributed.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:28, 7 May 2009 (EDT)

SanityOrMadness at 13:35, 7 May 2009

2009-05-07T13:35:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 7 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is terrible boilerplate. "Low resolution" indeed! We're not Wikipedia-- our images are mid-to-high. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 21:09, 6 May 2009 (EDT)		This is terrible boilerplate. "Low resolution" indeed! We're not Wikipedia-- our images are mid-to-high. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 21:09, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
			:For screencaps capped at full resolution (i.e., >=640×480, like this one), I ''might'' agree with you - they're at least more debatable in that sense. But comic scans tend to be <=72dpi, which I wouldn't call med-to-high-res (150-300dpi+). - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 09:35, 7 May 2009 (EDT)

Derik: New page: This is terrible boilerplate. "Low resolution" indeed! We're not Wikipedia-- our images are mid-to-high. -~~~~

2009-05-07T01:09:23Z

New page: This is terrible boilerplate. "Low resolution" indeed! We're not Wikipedia-- our images are mid-to-high. -~~~~

New page

This is terrible boilerplate. "Low resolution" indeed! We're not Wikipedia-- our images are mid-to-high. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 21:09, 6 May 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 7 May 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:For screencaps capped at full resolution (i.e., >=640×480, like this one), I ''might'' agree with you - they're at least more debatable in that sense. But comic scans tend to be <=72dpi, which I wouldn't call med-to-high-res (150-300dpi+). - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 09:35, 7 May 2009 (EDT)		:For screencaps capped at full resolution (i.e., >=640×480, like this one), I ''might'' agree with you - they're at least more debatable in that sense. But comic scans tend to be <=72dpi, which I wouldn't call med-to-high-res (150-300dpi+). - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 09:35, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
	::Hey, I at least made the template smarter than it used to be by having it trim out portions of the boilerplate text if the source is properly attributed.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:28, 7 May 2009 (EDT)		::Hey, I at least made the template smarter than it used to be by having it trim out portions of the boilerplate text if the source is properly attributed.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:28, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
			:::I'm just curious why there's no ArmadaCap/EnergonCap/CybertronCap templates (and, no, I'm not going to make them. I'm spending more than enough time trying to fix all the Marvel G1/G2 image sourcing right now) - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 13:01, 7 May 2009 (EDT)