File talk:ClancyBrown.jpg - Revision history

Abates at 21:00, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T21:00:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 18 July 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
	:::::::Better?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:04, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		:::::::Better?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:04, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
			::::::::Yes, I think that is better. Looking at the template, the wording is not far off what would be appropriate. Maybe we could add a "nonTF" flag to the fairuse template to modify the wording a bit. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 17:00, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

Nevermore at 19:04, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T19:04:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 18 July 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
	::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
			:::::::Better?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:04, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

Abates at 10:56, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T10:56:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 18 July 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
			::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

Nevermore at 10:25, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T10:25:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:25, 18 July 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
			:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

Cattleprod at 02:52, 17 July 2011

2011-07-17T02:52:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 17 July 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I think his point is that the copyright template used here, which says "This image is from or related to the Transformers brand, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it," is inaccurate. This image is ''not'' from or related to the Transformers brand, after all. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 16:50, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		::I think his point is that the copyright template used here, which says "This image is from or related to the Transformers brand, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it," is inaccurate. This image is ''not'' from or related to the Transformers brand, after all. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 16:50, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
			::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

Nevermore at 21:51, 16 July 2011

2011-07-16T21:51:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 16 July 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Your point being? Nearly all the photos for real people such as voice actors, writers, and so forth come from non-TF sources, on account of them not physically appearing in any TF media. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 15:20, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		:Your point being? Nearly all the photos for real people such as voice actors, writers, and so forth come from non-TF sources, on account of them not physically appearing in any TF media. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 15:20, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	::I think his point is that the copyright template used here, which says "This image is from or related to the Transformers brand, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it," is inaccurate. This image is ''not'' from or related to the Transformers brand, after all. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 16:50, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		::I think his point is that the copyright template used here, which says "This image is from or related to the Transformers brand, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it," is inaccurate. This image is ''not'' from or related to the Transformers brand, after all. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 16:50, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
			:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

KilMichaelMcC at 20:50, 16 July 2011

2011-07-16T20:50:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 16 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Aside from depicting Clancy Brown, this has nothing to do with TF: Prime. This appears to be a promo shot from ABC's ''Lost''. Seriously, people.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:39, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		Aside from depicting Clancy Brown, this has nothing to do with TF: Prime. This appears to be a promo shot from ABC's ''Lost''. Seriously, people.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:39, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	:Your point being? Nearly all the photos for real people such as voice actors, writers, and so forth come from non-TF sources, on account of them not physically appearing in any TF media. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 15:20, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		:Your point being? Nearly all the photos for real people such as voice actors, writers, and so forth come from non-TF sources, on account of them not physically appearing in any TF media. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 15:20, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
			::I think his point is that the copyright template used here, which says "This image is from or related to the Transformers brand, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it," is inaccurate. This image is ''not'' from or related to the Transformers brand, after all. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 16:50, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

Cattleprod at 19:20, 16 July 2011

2011-07-16T19:20:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 16 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Aside from depicting Clancy Brown, this has nothing to do with TF: Prime. This appears to be a promo shot from ABC's ''Lost''. Seriously, people.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:39, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		Aside from depicting Clancy Brown, this has nothing to do with TF: Prime. This appears to be a promo shot from ABC's ''Lost''. Seriously, people.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:39, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
			:Your point being? Nearly all the photos for real people such as voice actors, writers, and so forth come from non-TF sources, on account of them not physically appearing in any TF media. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 15:20, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

Nevermore: New page: Aside from depicting Clancy Brown, this has nothing to do with TF: Prime. This appears to be a promo shot from ABC's ''Lost''. Seriously, people.--~~~~

2011-07-16T18:39:48Z

New page: Aside from depicting Clancy Brown, this has nothing to do with TF: Prime. This appears to be a promo shot from ABC's ''Lost''. Seriously, people.--~~~~

New page

Aside from depicting Clancy Brown, this has nothing to do with TF: Prime. This appears to be a promo shot from ABC's ''Lost''. Seriously, people.--[[User:Nevermore|Nevermore]] 14:39, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 18 July 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
	:::::::Better?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:04, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		:::::::Better?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:04, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
			::::::::Yes, I think that is better. Looking at the template, the wording is not far off what would be appropriate. Maybe we could add a "nonTF" flag to the fairuse template to modify the wording a bit. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 17:00, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 18 July 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
	::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
			:::::::Better?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:04, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 18 July 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)		:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
			::::::I don't think we currently have a template more suitable than {{tl\|fairuse}}. I'd be in favour of a template for pictures of actors/crew/etc, though this picture is more in need of a decent description of the photo's context and who the copyright holder is. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 06:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:25, 18 July 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
			:::::So what now, ''do'' we have a suitable template, or do we discuss about my intentions some more and then ignore the issue and leave the picture with an inappropriate template because the matter is "too irrelevant"?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:25, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 17 July 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I think his point is that the copyright template used here, which says "This image is from or related to the Transformers brand, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it," is inaccurate. This image is ''not'' from or related to the Transformers brand, after all. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 16:50, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		::I think his point is that the copyright template used here, which says "This image is from or related to the Transformers brand, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it," is inaccurate. This image is ''not'' from or related to the Transformers brand, after all. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 16:50, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
	:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)		:::Exactly. If anything, we need a more accurate description (which I could get, with this being from ''Lost''), but I'm not sure which copyright template to use. There ought to be one better than this, though.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 17:51, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
			::::Sorry about that then, it looked like you were complaining about it simply being a non-TF related image. - [[User:Cattleprod\|Cattleprod]] 22:52, 16 July 2011 (EDT)