File talk:Razorclawtfu.jpg - Revision history

M Sipher at 09:50, 6 December 2009

2009-12-06T09:50:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 6 December 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)		::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)
	:::Add a third vote for the old one. I could barely make out any details on the new one. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]]		:::Add a third vote for the old one. I could barely make out any details on the new one. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]]
			::::Fourth. The box-art is pretty awful. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 04:50, 6 December 2009 (EST)

Khajidha at 07:42, 6 December 2009

2009-12-06T07:42:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 6 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)		: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)
	::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)		::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)
			:::Add a third vote for the old one. I could barely make out any details on the new one. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]]

Repowers at 07:14, 6 December 2009

2009-12-06T07:14:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 6 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)		I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)
	: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)		: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)
			::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)

ItsWalky at 06:53, 6 December 2009

2009-12-06T06:53:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:53, 6 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)		I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)
	: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless ~~they convey~~ important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)		: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)

ItsWalky at 06:53, 6 December 2009

2009-12-06T06:53:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:53, 6 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)		I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)
			: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless they convey important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)

Detour: New page: I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --~~~~

2009-12-06T06:43:23Z

New page: I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --~~~~

New page

I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 6 December 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)		::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)
	:::Add a third vote for the old one. I could barely make out any details on the new one. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]]		:::Add a third vote for the old one. I could barely make out any details on the new one. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]]
			::::Fourth. The box-art is pretty awful. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 04:50, 6 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 6 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)		: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)
	::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)		::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)
			:::Add a third vote for the old one. I could barely make out any details on the new one. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]]