Help:Nameless - Revision history

Cyberlink420: Protected "Help:Nameless" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite))

2024-01-19T23:50:40Z

Protected "Help:Nameless" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite))

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:50, 19 January 2024
(No difference)

Shoutsuo: /* "But he's obviously..." */ fixed armada flat out's link so that it directs to it's current page instead of it's old page

2022-12-03T00:21:38Z

"But he's obviously...": fixed armada flat out's link so that it directs to it's current page instead of it's old page

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 3 December 2022
Line 82:		Line 82:
	=="But he's obviously..."==		=="But he's obviously..."==
	[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]
	The appearance of [[Flat-Out (~~LOTM~~)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."		The appearance of [[Flat-Out (Armada)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."

	In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.		In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.

Saix: /* "But he's obviously..." */clean up, replaced: (MD) → (LOTM)

2021-01-05T04:31:49Z

"But he's obviously...": clean up, replaced: (MD) → (LOTM)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, 5 January 2021
Line 82:		Line 82:
	=="But he's obviously..."==		=="But he's obviously..."==
	[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]
	The appearance of [[Flat-Out (MD)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."		The appearance of [[Flat-Out (LOTM)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."

	In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.		In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.

Abates: /* "But he's obviously..." */

2018-04-15T08:57:49Z

"But he's obviously..."

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 15 April 2018
Line 82:		Line 82:
	=="But he's obviously..."==		=="But he's obviously..."==
	[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]
	The appearance of [[Flat-Out (~~Armada~~)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."		The appearance of [[Flat-Out (MD)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."

	In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.		In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.

Foffy the Sheep: Giant Decepticon Soldier has been named, and thus is no longer an applicable example of no-name designation. I've replaced him with a new example.

2015-12-26T20:00:09Z

Giant Decepticon Soldier has been named, and thus is no longer an applicable example of no-name designation. I've replaced him with a new example.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 26 December 2015
Line 40:		Line 40:
	\|-		\|-
	\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname-designation}}</tt>'''		\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname-designation}}</tt>'''
	\|\|Lacks a name, but has an official designation. (Either an in-fiction non-name title, or an internal designation.) '''Examples:''' [[El Presidente\|el Presidente]], [[Giant ~~Decepticon Soldier~~]]		\|\|Lacks a name, but has an official designation. (Either an in-fiction non-name title, or an internal designation.) '''Examples:''' [[El Presidente\|el Presidente]], [[Giant fake Autobot]]
	\|\|		\|\|
	{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"		{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"
Line 78:		Line 78:
	The best names are simple and descriptive, such as [[hideous giant brain guy]]. If the best description that can be given isn't very distinctive, like [[Padlock (Energon)#Orange jet Autobot\|Orange jet Autobot]], it might be more appropriate to incorporate the subject in the article of a related, distinctive subject as a near-final section, with a header like "Associated Characters". Whether this is possible depends on the qualities of the main article. Imagine that an "associated character" appeared only a handful of times while the main character appeared constantly across three different continuities; Putting information on an "associated character" on a lengthy and diverse page would only be messy and confusing.		The best names are simple and descriptive, such as [[hideous giant brain guy]]. If the best description that can be given isn't very distinctive, like [[Padlock (Energon)#Orange jet Autobot\|Orange jet Autobot]], it might be more appropriate to incorporate the subject in the article of a related, distinctive subject as a near-final section, with a header like "Associated Characters". Whether this is possible depends on the qualities of the main article. Imagine that an "associated character" appeared only a handful of times while the main character appeared constantly across three different continuities; Putting information on an "associated character" on a lengthy and diverse page would only be messy and confusing.

	Finally, a to-the-point nickname can be used if a descriptive name proves too complicated. "That red and green Autobot who looks like Fortress Maximus but is the size of a normal Autobot," is kinda a mouthful, but [[Christmas Maximus]] (a reference to his distinctive color scheme) is just about right. <u>Nicknames that could be confused with real names are not appropriate.</u>		Finally, a to-the-point nickname can be used if a descriptive name proves too complicated. "That red and green Autobot who looks like Fortress Maximus but is the size of a normal Autobot," is kinda a mouthful, but [[Peritus Maximus\|Christmas Maximus]] (a reference to his distinctive color scheme) is just about right. <u>Nicknames that could be confused with real names are not appropriate.</u>

	=="But he's obviously..."==		=="But he's obviously..."==

Saix at 07:20, 4 June 2015

2015-06-04T07:20:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:20, 4 June 2015
Line 76:		Line 76:
	{{SITENAME_SHORT}} does '''not''' allow [[fanon]] names to be used for nameless stuff.		{{SITENAME_SHORT}} does '''not''' allow [[fanon]] names to be used for nameless stuff.

	The best names are simple and descriptive, such as [[~~Piano Transformer~~ guy]]. If the best description that can be given isn't very distinctive, like [[Padlock (Energon)#Orange jet Autobot\|Orange jet Autobot]], it might be more appropriate to incorporate the subject in the article of a related, distinctive subject as a near-final section, with a header like "Associated Characters". Whether this is possible depends on the qualities of the main article. Imagine that an "associated character" appeared only a handful of times while the main character appeared constantly across three different continuities; Putting information on an "associated character" on a lengthy and diverse page would only be messy and confusing.		The best names are simple and descriptive, such as [[hideous giant brain guy]]. If the best description that can be given isn't very distinctive, like [[Padlock (Energon)#Orange jet Autobot\|Orange jet Autobot]], it might be more appropriate to incorporate the subject in the article of a related, distinctive subject as a near-final section, with a header like "Associated Characters". Whether this is possible depends on the qualities of the main article. Imagine that an "associated character" appeared only a handful of times while the main character appeared constantly across three different continuities; Putting information on an "associated character" on a lengthy and diverse page would only be messy and confusing.

	Finally, a to-the-point nickname can be used if a descriptive name proves too complicated. "That red and green Autobot who looks like Fortress Maximus but is the size of a normal Autobot," is kinda a mouthful, but [[Christmas Maximus]] (a reference to his distinctive color scheme) is just about right. <u>Nicknames that could be confused with real names are not appropriate.</u>		Finally, a to-the-point nickname can be used if a descriptive name proves too complicated. "That red and green Autobot who looks like Fortress Maximus but is the size of a normal Autobot," is kinda a mouthful, but [[Christmas Maximus]] (a reference to his distinctive color scheme) is just about right. <u>Nicknames that could be confused with real names are not appropriate.</u>

Abates at 01:45, 12 April 2015

2015-04-12T01:45:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 12 April 2015
Line 56:		Line 56:
	\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname-nickname}}</tt>'''		\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname-nickname}}</tt>'''
	\|\|Things lacking ''any'' specific term at all. A description or nickname may be used.		\|\|Things lacking ''any'' specific term at all. A description or nickname may be used.
	'''Examples:''' [[Big Red]]		'''Examples:''' [[Big Red (G1)\|Big Red]]
	\|\|		\|\|
	{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"		{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"
Line 82:		Line 82:
	=="But he's obviously..."==		=="But he's obviously..."==
	[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]
	The appearance of [[Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[~~Generation 1~~ (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."		The appearance of [[Flat-Out (Armada)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."

	In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.		In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.

Nevermore: /* Naming convention */

2014-11-01T18:11:31Z

Naming convention

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 1 November 2014
Line 76:		Line 76:
	{{SITENAME_SHORT}} does '''not''' allow [[fanon]] names to be used for nameless stuff.		{{SITENAME_SHORT}} does '''not''' allow [[fanon]] names to be used for nameless stuff.

	The best names are simple and descriptive, such as [[Piano Transformer guy]]. If the best description that can be given isn't very distinctive, like [[Padlock (Energon)\|Orange jet Autobot]], it might be more appropriate to incorporate the subject in the article of a related, distinctive subject as a near-final section, with a header like "Associated Characters". Whether this is possible depends on the qualities of the main article. Imagine that an "associated character" appeared only a handful of times while the main character appeared constantly across three different continuities; Putting information on an "associated character" on a lengthy and diverse page would only be messy and confusing.		The best names are simple and descriptive, such as [[Piano Transformer guy]]. If the best description that can be given isn't very distinctive, like [[Padlock (Energon)#Orange jet Autobot\|Orange jet Autobot]], it might be more appropriate to incorporate the subject in the article of a related, distinctive subject as a near-final section, with a header like "Associated Characters". Whether this is possible depends on the qualities of the main article. Imagine that an "associated character" appeared only a handful of times while the main character appeared constantly across three different continuities; Putting information on an "associated character" on a lengthy and diverse page would only be messy and confusing.

	Finally, a to-the-point nickname can be used if a descriptive name proves too complicated. "That red and green Autobot who looks like Fortress Maximus but is the size of a normal Autobot," is kinda a mouthful, but [[Christmas Maximus]] (a reference to his distinctive color scheme) is just about right. <u>Nicknames that could be confused with real names are not appropriate.</u>		Finally, a to-the-point nickname can be used if a descriptive name proves too complicated. "That red and green Autobot who looks like Fortress Maximus but is the size of a normal Autobot," is kinda a mouthful, but [[Christmas Maximus]] (a reference to his distinctive color scheme) is just about right. <u>Nicknames that could be confused with real names are not appropriate.</u>

Abates: /* "But he's obviously..." */

2014-08-22T09:38:20Z

"But he's obviously..."

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 22 August 2014
Line 82:		Line 82:
	=="But he's obviously..."==		=="But he's obviously..."==
	[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]
	The appearance of [[Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[Generation 1 (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."		The appearance of [[Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[Generation 1 (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."

	In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.		In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.

Khajidha: sorting, not shorting

2011-10-31T18:15:17Z

sorting, not shorting

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 31 October 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|-		\|-
	\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname}}</tt>'''		\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname}}</tt>'''
	\|\|A generic "No name" template. This template should ''only be used as a placeholder'' before ~~shorting~~ the character into a more specific category.		\|\|A generic "No name" template. This template should ''only be used as a placeholder'' before sorting the character into a more specific category.
	\|width="500"\|		\|width="500"\|
	{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"		{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 12 April 2015
Line 56:		Line 56:
	\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname-nickname}}</tt>'''		\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname-nickname}}</tt>'''
	\|\|Things lacking ''any'' specific term at all. A description or nickname may be used.		\|\|Things lacking ''any'' specific term at all. A description or nickname may be used.
	'''Examples:''' [[Big Red]]		'''Examples:''' [[Big Red (G1)\|Big Red]]
	\|\|		\|\|
	{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"		{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"
Line 82:		Line 82:
	=="But he's obviously..."==		=="But he's obviously..."==
	[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[Image:Linkage5-PreEarth.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]
	The appearance of [[Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[~~Generation 1~~ (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."		The appearance of [[Flat-Out (Armada)\|Flat-Out]] and [[Redline]]'s Decepticon masters in [[Linkage (comic)\|Linkage]] (Armada) is based on ''[[The Transformers (franchise)\|Generation 1]]'' [[Slugslinger (G1)\|Slugslinger]] and [[Misfire (G1)\|Misfire]]. However, it is never correct to assume that these characters are ''called'' Slugslinger and Misfire. After all, the [[Downshift (Energon)\|guy who looks just like Wheeljack]] isn't named (or even remotely like) Wheeljack. And a [[Ravenus\|dead ringer for Swoop]] is instead named "Ravenus."

	In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.		In fact, while characters ''actually'' named [[Slugslinger (Energon)\|Slugslinger]], [[Wheeljack (Armada)\|Wheeljack]], and [[Swoop (Energon)\|Swoop]] all exist in the Unicron Trilogy, ''none'' of them appear to be related to their G1-homage lookalikes. It is possible (and in fact common) to pay [[Homage\|homage]] to a character's appearance without actually ''being'' that character, so automatically assuming that a lookalike in a different universe is the same character doesn't make a lot of sense.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 31 October 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|-		\|-
	\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname}}</tt>'''		\|\|'''<tt>{{tl\|noname}}</tt>'''
	\|\|A generic "No name" template. This template should ''only be used as a placeholder'' before ~~shorting~~ the character into a more specific category.		\|\|A generic "No name" template. This template should ''only be used as a placeholder'' before sorting the character into a more specific category.
	\|width="500"\|		\|width="500"\|
	{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"		{\| class="plainlinks" width="100%"