Help talk:Franchise identifiers - Revision history

Saix at 17:52, 22 April 2016

2016-04-22T17:52:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 22 April 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly (RID)\|Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Kelly (RID)\|Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly (RID)\|Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

	:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Abates: /* Question on Henkei */

2012-05-22T06:57:09Z

Question on Henkei

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:57, 22 May 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==Question on ''Henkei''==		==Question on ''Henkei''==
	The [[Henkei! Henkei! (franchise)\|''Henkei!'' franchise]], that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)		The [[Henkei! Henkei! Transformers (franchise)\|''Henkei!'' franchise]], that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)

	==Another question on Henkei!==		==Another question on Henkei!==
	The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)		The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Universe */

2011-04-08T15:34:55Z

Universe

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 8 April 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
	:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
	::The page seems to indicate that characters/concepts from [[~~Expanded Universe (franchise)\|~~Expanded Universe]] would also use the (Universe) disambig, but all the original characters from that toyline are tagged (G1). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:13, 8 April 2011 (EDT)		::The page seems to indicate that characters/concepts from [[Expanded Universe]] would also use the (Universe) disambig, but all the original characters from that toyline are tagged (G1). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:13, 8 April 2011 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Universe */

2011-04-08T15:13:23Z

Universe

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 8 April 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
	:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
			::The page seems to indicate that characters/concepts from [[Expanded Universe (franchise)\|Expanded Universe]] would also use the (Universe) disambig, but all the original characters from that toyline are tagged (G1). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:13, 8 April 2011 (EDT)

NCZ: /* Universe */

2010-10-17T17:22:08Z

Universe

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 17 October 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
			:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)

Nevermore: /* Universe */ new section

2010-10-17T17:13:53Z

Universe: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 17 October 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Another question on Henkei!==		==Another question on Henkei!==
	The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)		The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)

			== Universe ==

			As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)

Geewunling at 06:55, 19 February 2010

2010-02-19T06:55:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 19 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly (RID)\|Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

	:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:: That would be inconsistent with how we handle the rest of the wiki. [~~http~~:~~//transformers.wikia.com/wiki/~~Category:Micron_Boosters Micron Boosters], for example, which share names with characters from other franchises get tagged with either (Armada), (Energon), or (Cybertron), because, well, those are the American names for each series. Binaltech and Alternators are the same principle.		:: That would be inconsistent with how we handle the rest of the wiki. [[:Category:Micron_Boosters\|Micron Boosters]], for example, which share names with characters from other franchises get tagged with either (Armada), (Energon), or (Cybertron), because, well, those are the American names for each series. Binaltech and Alternators are the same principle.
	:: To answer your other question, M Sipher is always huffy. About everything. I think he's insecure. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 07:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:: To answer your other question, M Sipher is always huffy. About everything. I think he's insecure. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 07:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::If they share names, right. But if they are a new thing that exists only in Galaxy Force and not in Cybertron, or only in Masterforce but not in USG1... We give them the Japanese franchise name, right? Why would Alt/BT be different? Say another character named Ai Kurama comes along as part of TF:Heroes or whatever. They should be Ai (Heroes) and Ai (BT), not Ai (Alternators). --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:::If they share names, right. But if they are a new thing that exists only in Galaxy Force and not in Cybertron, or only in Masterforce but not in USG1... We give them the Japanese franchise name, right? Why would Alt/BT be different? Say another character named Ai Kurama comes along as part of TF:Heroes or whatever. They should be Ai (Heroes) and Ai (BT), not Ai (Alternators). --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==Question on ''Henkei''==		==Question on ''Henkei''==
	The [[Henkei! Henkei! (~~toyline~~)\|Henkei]] ~~franchise~~, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)		The [[Henkei! Henkei! (franchise)\|''Henkei!'' franchise]], that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)
	==Another question on Henkei!==		==Another question on Henkei!==
	The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)		The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Question on Henkei */

2010-01-22T23:35:40Z

Question on Henkei

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 22 January 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Question on ''Henkei''==		==Question on ''Henkei''==
	The [[Henkei! Henkei! (toyline)\|Henkei]] franchise, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)		The [[Henkei! Henkei! (toyline)\|Henkei]] franchise, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)
			==Another question on Henkei!==
			The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)

Deceptitran: BOT: replacing (1) links to "Henkei! Henkei!" with "Henkei! Henkei! (toyline)"

2009-04-04T10:47:38Z

BOT: replacing (1) links to "Henkei! Henkei!" with "Henkei! Henkei! (toyline)"

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 4 April 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==Question on ''Henkei''==		==Question on ''Henkei''==
	The [[Henkei! Henkei!\|Henkei]] franchise, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)		The [[Henkei! Henkei! (toyline)\|Henkei]] franchise, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)

Lonegamer78: /* Question on Henkei */

2009-03-24T07:03:11Z

Question on Henkei

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 24 March 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==Question on ''Henkei''==		==Question on ''Henkei''==
	The [[Henkei! Henkei!\|Henkei]] franchise, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots ~~first~~ first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)		The [[Henkei! Henkei!\|Henkei]] franchise, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 22 April 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly (RID)\|Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Kelly (RID)\|Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly (RID)\|Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

	:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 8 April 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
	:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
	::The page seems to indicate that characters/concepts from [[~~Expanded Universe (franchise)\|~~Expanded Universe]] would also use the (Universe) disambig, but all the original characters from that toyline are tagged (G1). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:13, 8 April 2011 (EDT)		::The page seems to indicate that characters/concepts from [[Expanded Universe]] would also use the (Universe) disambig, but all the original characters from that toyline are tagged (G1). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:13, 8 April 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 8 April 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		As [[Ransack (Universe 2003)]] and [[Ransack (Universe 2008)]] show, there's further disambiguation necessary now.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 13:13, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
	:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)		:Yes, the page should be updated. The "Universe" disambig seems to cover the second line as well (see [[Heavy Load (Universe)]]), so I assume the years would be added if different characters with the same name are in both. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 13:22, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
			::The page seems to indicate that characters/concepts from [[Expanded Universe (franchise)\|Expanded Universe]] would also use the (Universe) disambig, but all the original characters from that toyline are tagged (G1). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:13, 8 April 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 19 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		"A lot"? The fuck? There's all of ONE character from BT who doesn't previously exist in America, and that's Zoom-Zoom, who wouldn't NEED an identifier. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		: Well, there are a lot of characters and ideas that haven't been in other Transformers stories, such as Iron Klaw or whoever, Bodyshop Project, etc, but those, as you say, don't need identifiers. You're right, it's a non-issue. There's no double-uses in the franchise. I think even T-AI and, uh, Junko can be split up from their other-universe counterparts without use of disambig parentheticals. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 06:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:: Well, the BTA character is actually [[Ai Kuruma]], and not only does BTA [[Junko Shiragami]] have a last name the CR character doesn't, but she was [[Kelly (RID)\|Kelly]] in RID anyway... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

	:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:It is basically a non-issue, I agree, but I don't see what Siph is huffy about in his first post. The BT fiction is filled with stuff that is not part of Alternators, just like the text says. If any of those things ever need an identifier, "Alternators" is not the right one to use. G1 might be, depending on what it is, or BT might be. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 07:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:: That would be inconsistent with how we handle the rest of the wiki. [~~http~~:~~//transformers.wikia.com/wiki/~~Category:Micron_Boosters Micron Boosters], for example, which share names with characters from other franchises get tagged with either (Armada), (Energon), or (Cybertron), because, well, those are the American names for each series. Binaltech and Alternators are the same principle.		:: That would be inconsistent with how we handle the rest of the wiki. [[:Category:Micron_Boosters\|Micron Boosters]], for example, which share names with characters from other franchises get tagged with either (Armada), (Energon), or (Cybertron), because, well, those are the American names for each series. Binaltech and Alternators are the same principle.
	:: To answer your other question, M Sipher is always huffy. About everything. I think he's insecure. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 07:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:: To answer your other question, M Sipher is always huffy. About everything. I think he's insecure. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 07:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::If they share names, right. But if they are a new thing that exists only in Galaxy Force and not in Cybertron, or only in Masterforce but not in USG1... We give them the Japanese franchise name, right? Why would Alt/BT be different? Say another character named Ai Kurama comes along as part of TF:Heroes or whatever. They should be Ai (Heroes) and Ai (BT), not Ai (Alternators). --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:::If they share names, right. But if they are a new thing that exists only in Galaxy Force and not in Cybertron, or only in Masterforce but not in USG1... We give them the Japanese franchise name, right? Why would Alt/BT be different? Say another character named Ai Kurama comes along as part of TF:Heroes or whatever. They should be Ai (Heroes) and Ai (BT), not Ai (Alternators). --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==Question on ''Henkei''==		==Question on ''Henkei''==
	The [[Henkei! Henkei! (~~toyline~~)\|Henkei]] ~~franchise~~, that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)		The [[Henkei! Henkei! (franchise)\|''Henkei!'' franchise]], that is. I know, it should/would be obvious but I want to check with the boss bots first. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 02:58, 24 March 2009 (EDT)
	==Another question on Henkei!==		==Another question on Henkei!==
	The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)		The article states that both (Henkei!) and (Henkei) are acceptable disambigs, should we pick one for consistency or leave alone? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 18:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)