Talk:Ability - Revision history

Zadok Rox: After further review,...

2010-01-03T20:11:17Z

After further review,...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 3 January 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)		::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)
	:::In that case, if the powers-that-be feel that this article should intergreted into the Transformer Biology article, so be it. Perhaps Repowers is right. I really wanted to point out how the G1 cartoon and G1 bio didn't jive in regards of abilites, but I suppose that could be made a footnote. As for the other medias, they can probably be deleted. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 12:42, 3 January 2010 (EST)		:::In that case, if the powers-that-be feel that this article should intergreted into the Transformer Biology article, so be it. Perhaps Repowers is right. I really wanted to point out how the G1 cartoon and G1 bio didn't jive in regards of abilites, but I suppose that could be made a footnote. As for the other medias, they can probably be deleted. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 12:42, 3 January 2010 (EST)
			:::After some time and looking over the article again, Repowers is indeed right. There's so little information regarding abilities that it could be shoehorned as a brief paragraph in the Transformers Biology article. I'll see if it can be done then perhaps this article could be deleted. Thanks, Repowers and ItsWalky. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 15:11, 3 January 2010 (EST)

Zadok Rox at 17:42, 3 January 2010

2010-01-03T17:42:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 3 January 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)		:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)
	::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)		::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)
			:::In that case, if the powers-that-be feel that this article should intergreted into the Transformer Biology article, so be it. Perhaps Repowers is right. I really wanted to point out how the G1 cartoon and G1 bio didn't jive in regards of abilites, but I suppose that could be made a footnote. As for the other medias, they can probably be deleted. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 12:42, 3 January 2010 (EST)

ItsWalky at 03:06, 3 January 2010

2010-01-03T03:06:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 3 January 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)		Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)
	:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)		:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)
			::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)

Zadok Rox: Forgot a couple of letters. Nothing to see.

2010-01-03T02:58:12Z

Forgot a couple of letters. Nothing to see.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 3 January 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)		Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)
	:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] is a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)		:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)

Zadok Rox at 02:57, 3 January 2010

2010-01-03T02:57:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 3 January 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)		Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)
			:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] is a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)

Repowers at 01:35, 3 January 2010

2010-01-03T01:35:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 3 January 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)		:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)
	::::Truth be told, I though about suggesting an abilities category when I wrote [[Telekinesis]]. I suppose [[hologram]]s, and maybe make some articles on invisibility and magnetism. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 21:26, 29 December 2009 (EST)		::::Truth be told, I though about suggesting an abilities category when I wrote [[Telekinesis]]. I suppose [[hologram]]s, and maybe make some articles on invisibility and magnetism. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 21:26, 29 December 2009 (EST)

			Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)

SFH at 02:26, 30 December 2009

2009-12-30T02:26:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 30 December 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I had second thoughts about a list when I thought a little about what would be included in it. "Ability" is a little hard to define and overlaps with "weapons". Maybe we should have an "Abilities" category no matter how small it is and try to fill it in with a couple more. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:30, 27 December 2009 (EST)		::I had second thoughts about a list when I thought a little about what would be included in it. "Ability" is a little hard to define and overlaps with "weapons". Maybe we should have an "Abilities" category no matter how small it is and try to fill it in with a couple more. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:30, 27 December 2009 (EST)
	:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)		:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)
			::::Truth be told, I though about suggesting an abilities category when I wrote [[Telekinesis]]. I suppose [[hologram]]s, and maybe make some articles on invisibility and magnetism. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 21:26, 29 December 2009 (EST)

Zadok Rox at 02:20, 30 December 2009

2009-12-30T02:20:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 30 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I believe it was stated that TFwiki hates list (atleast that was what I was told when I was making a list of every type of function for the [[Function]] article). Even if we did make a list, there are some abilities that overlap (i.e. - the magnetic ability mention in this article). I wouldn't mind a list, but that would be up to the powers-that-be. As for seperate articles on these powers, that would probably be based on the individual power (there's one for Glass gas). - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 14:47, 27 December 2009 (EST)		:I believe it was stated that TFwiki hates list (atleast that was what I was told when I was making a list of every type of function for the [[Function]] article). Even if we did make a list, there are some abilities that overlap (i.e. - the magnetic ability mention in this article). I wouldn't mind a list, but that would be up to the powers-that-be. As for seperate articles on these powers, that would probably be based on the individual power (there's one for Glass gas). - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 14:47, 27 December 2009 (EST)
	::I had second thoughts about a list when I thought a little about what would be included in it. "Ability" is a little hard to define and overlaps with "weapons". Maybe we should have an "Abilities" category no matter how small it is and try to fill it in with a couple more. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:30, 27 December 2009 (EST)		::I had second thoughts about a list when I thought a little about what would be included in it. "Ability" is a little hard to define and overlaps with "weapons". Maybe we should have an "Abilities" category no matter how small it is and try to fill it in with a couple more. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:30, 27 December 2009 (EST)
			:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)

Starfield at 01:30, 28 December 2009

2009-12-28T01:30:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 28 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We don't really have any place to find all of the examples of abilities. Ordinarily an "Abilities" category would be the right place, but I'm not sure all of the abilities would make a good article. For example, do we really want/need an "Earthquake generating ability" ([[Rumble (G1)]], [[Earthquake (G1)]]) page? Maybe we do. What do you think? If we don't want to make an article for each ability, can we list all known abilities here, so we have all of the examples in one place? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:30, 26 December 2009 (EST)		We don't really have any place to find all of the examples of abilities. Ordinarily an "Abilities" category would be the right place, but I'm not sure all of the abilities would make a good article. For example, do we really want/need an "Earthquake generating ability" ([[Rumble (G1)]], [[Earthquake (G1)]]) page? Maybe we do. What do you think? If we don't want to make an article for each ability, can we list all known abilities here, so we have all of the examples in one place? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:30, 26 December 2009 (EST)
	:I believe it was stated that TFwiki hates list (atleast that was what I was told when I was making a list of every type of function for the [[Function]] article). Even if we did make a list, there are some abilities that overlap (i.e. - the magnetic ability mention in this article). I wouldn't mind a list, but that would be up to the powers-that-be. As for seperate articles on these powers, that would probably be based on the individual power (there's one for Glass gas). - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 14:47, 27 December 2009 (EST)		:I believe it was stated that TFwiki hates list (atleast that was what I was told when I was making a list of every type of function for the [[Function]] article). Even if we did make a list, there are some abilities that overlap (i.e. - the magnetic ability mention in this article). I wouldn't mind a list, but that would be up to the powers-that-be. As for seperate articles on these powers, that would probably be based on the individual power (there's one for Glass gas). - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 14:47, 27 December 2009 (EST)
			::I had second thoughts about a list when I thought a little about what would be included in it. "Ability" is a little hard to define and overlaps with "weapons". Maybe we should have an "Abilities" category no matter how small it is and try to fill it in with a couple more. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:30, 27 December 2009 (EST)

Zadok Rox at 19:47, 27 December 2009

2009-12-27T19:47:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 27 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We don't really have any place to find all of the examples of abilities. Ordinarily an "Abilities" category would be the right place, but I'm not sure all of the abilities would make a good article. For example, do we really want/need an "Earthquake generating ability" ([[Rumble (G1)]], [[Earthquake (G1)]]) page? Maybe we do. What do you think? If we don't want to make an article for each ability, can we list all known abilities here, so we have all of the examples in one place? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:30, 26 December 2009 (EST)		We don't really have any place to find all of the examples of abilities. Ordinarily an "Abilities" category would be the right place, but I'm not sure all of the abilities would make a good article. For example, do we really want/need an "Earthquake generating ability" ([[Rumble (G1)]], [[Earthquake (G1)]]) page? Maybe we do. What do you think? If we don't want to make an article for each ability, can we list all known abilities here, so we have all of the examples in one place? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:30, 26 December 2009 (EST)
			:I believe it was stated that TFwiki hates list (atleast that was what I was told when I was making a list of every type of function for the [[Function]] article). Even if we did make a list, there are some abilities that overlap (i.e. - the magnetic ability mention in this article). I wouldn't mind a list, but that would be up to the powers-that-be. As for seperate articles on these powers, that would probably be based on the individual power (there's one for Glass gas). - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 14:47, 27 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 3 January 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)		::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)
	:::In that case, if the powers-that-be feel that this article should intergreted into the Transformer Biology article, so be it. Perhaps Repowers is right. I really wanted to point out how the G1 cartoon and G1 bio didn't jive in regards of abilites, but I suppose that could be made a footnote. As for the other medias, they can probably be deleted. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 12:42, 3 January 2010 (EST)		:::In that case, if the powers-that-be feel that this article should intergreted into the Transformer Biology article, so be it. Perhaps Repowers is right. I really wanted to point out how the G1 cartoon and G1 bio didn't jive in regards of abilites, but I suppose that could be made a footnote. As for the other medias, they can probably be deleted. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 12:42, 3 January 2010 (EST)
			:::After some time and looking over the article again, Repowers is indeed right. There's so little information regarding abilities that it could be shoehorned as a brief paragraph in the Transformers Biology article. I'll see if it can be done then perhaps this article could be deleted. Thanks, Repowers and ItsWalky. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 15:11, 3 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 3 January 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)		:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)
	::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)		::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)
			:::In that case, if the powers-that-be feel that this article should intergreted into the Transformer Biology article, so be it. Perhaps Repowers is right. I really wanted to point out how the G1 cartoon and G1 bio didn't jive in regards of abilites, but I suppose that could be made a footnote. As for the other medias, they can probably be deleted. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 12:42, 3 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 3 January 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)		Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)
	:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)		:If you wish to make that point, then why isn't [[Energo weapon]] a footnote under [[Sword]] or [[Bio]] isn't a footnote under [[Tech Spec]]? - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:57, 2 January 2010 (EST)
			::Energo weapon is a named thing. A proper noun. "Ability" is not. Bios are NOT Tech-specs. They are two different things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:06, 2 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 3 January 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)		:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)
	::::Truth be told, I though about suggesting an abilities category when I wrote [[Telekinesis]]. I suppose [[hologram]]s, and maybe make some articles on invisibility and magnetism. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 21:26, 29 December 2009 (EST)		::::Truth be told, I though about suggesting an abilities category when I wrote [[Telekinesis]]. I suppose [[hologram]]s, and maybe make some articles on invisibility and magnetism. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 21:26, 29 December 2009 (EST)

			Somebody explain to me why this article's content, such as it is, isn't just a footnote under [[Transformer#Biology]]? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:35, 2 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 30 December 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I had second thoughts about a list when I thought a little about what would be included in it. "Ability" is a little hard to define and overlaps with "weapons". Maybe we should have an "Abilities" category no matter how small it is and try to fill it in with a couple more. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:30, 27 December 2009 (EST)		::I had second thoughts about a list when I thought a little about what would be included in it. "Ability" is a little hard to define and overlaps with "weapons". Maybe we should have an "Abilities" category no matter how small it is and try to fill it in with a couple more. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:30, 27 December 2009 (EST)
	:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)		:::That's a thought. - [[User:Zadok Rox\|Zadok Rox]] 21:20, 29 December 2009 (EST)
			::::Truth be told, I though about suggesting an abilities category when I wrote [[Telekinesis]]. I suppose [[hologram]]s, and maybe make some articles on invisibility and magnetism. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 21:26, 29 December 2009 (EST)