Talk:Ai (CR) - Revision history

Saix: clean up, replaced: → (8), * → *, T-AI (RID) → T-AI (2)

2016-03-12T19:42:11Z

clean up, replaced: → (8), * → *, T-AI (RID) → T-AI (2)

Abates at 08:45, 30 October 2014

2014-10-30T08:45:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 30 October 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Right. Being a character in ALT2Day is almost a guarantee that you're NOT from the Animated continuity family. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 11:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)		: Right. Being a character in ALT2Day is almost a guarantee that you're NOT from the Animated continuity family. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 11:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::But her name is "Ai." Not an acronym? Is she really human? Does T-AI play Ai in the advertisement? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:04, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::But her name is "Ai." Not an acronym? Is she really human? Does T-AI play Ai in the advertisement? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:04, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::: Being from the multiverse and all, it could be that she IS Ai-chan, the [[T-AI]] from the Car Robots continuity (as opposed to the Robots In Disguise Continuity). If this were the case, I would put her on T-AI's page, being from the same multiverse cluster as the RID character. ----[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 12:35, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::: Being from the multiverse and all, it could be that she IS Ai-chan, the [[T-AI (RID)\|T-AI]] from the Car Robots continuity (as opposed to the Robots In Disguise Continuity). If this were the case, I would put her on T-AI's page, being from the same multiverse cluster as the RID character. ----[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 12:35, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::I forgot her Japanese name was Ai-chan. How come that's not on her page? So she's a G1 character. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:06, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::I forgot her Japanese name was Ai-chan. How come that's not on her page? So she's a G1 character. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:06, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::[[T-AI#Foreign names\|It is on her page]]. I would tend to agree with merging this with T-AI's page. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:22, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::[[T-AI (RID)#Foreign names\|It is on her page]]. I would tend to agree with merging this with T-AI's page. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:22, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::Funny, I would merge it with [[Ai Kuruma]]'s page. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::Funny, I would merge it with [[Ai Kuruma]]'s page. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::I actually thought this was T-AI until I went to Bill Forster's page and it just said "Ai", so I assumed it was a new character. I just put it under "Animated" because I didn't know where else. Feel free to merge with either. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 16:34, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::I actually thought this was T-AI until I went to Bill Forster's page and it just said "Ai", so I assumed it was a new character. I just put it under "Animated" because I didn't know where else. Feel free to merge with either. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 16:34, 23 February 2011 (EST)

Mimi: Mimi moved page Talk:Ai to Talk:Ai (CR): Ai should redirect to the disambig page.

2014-02-05T14:01:43Z

Mimi moved page Talk:Ai to Talk:Ai (CR): Ai should redirect to the disambig page.

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:01, 5 February 2014
(No difference)

Starfield at 19:50, 23 March 2011

2011-03-23T19:50:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 23 March 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::::If not, I'd want to know the backstory on how Car Robots Ai got involved with selling insurance. Seems a waste of a good tactical artificial intelligence. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:50, 23 March 2011 (EDT)

Chris McFeely at 01:00, 24 February 2011

2011-02-24T01:00:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 24 February 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)

Semysane at 00:59, 24 February 2011

2011-02-24T00:59:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 24 February 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)

Ascendron at 22:17, 23 February 2011

2011-02-23T22:17:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 23 February 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::::::: Oh, Allspark Almanac! How could such a wonderful book be the source of such strife! sobs Seriously though, my main argument towards the merge: If it looks like a duck, and people call it a duck, it's probably a duck. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:12, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::: Oh, Allspark Almanac! How could such a wonderful book be the source of such strife! sobs Seriously though, my main argument towards the merge: If it looks like a duck, and people call it a duck, it's probably a duck. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:12, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)

ItsWalky at 22:14, 23 February 2011

2011-02-23T22:14:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 23 February 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::::: I think she's just Car Robots Ai-chan. She's drawn indistinguishably from her, and she's certainly not drawn in an Animated-universe style. (Meaning, regardless of who she is, she's definitely not "from the Animated continuity" or whatever like the top of the page claims.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:11, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::: I think she's just Car Robots Ai-chan. She's drawn indistinguishably from her, and she's certainly not drawn in an Animated-universe style. (Meaning, regardless of who she is, she's definitely not "from the Animated continuity" or whatever like the top of the page claims.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:11, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::: Oh, Allspark Almanac! How could such a wonderful book be the source of such strife! sobs Seriously though, my main argument towards the merge: If it looks like a duck, and people call it a duck, it's probably a duck. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:12, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::: Oh, Allspark Almanac! How could such a wonderful book be the source of such strife! sobs Seriously though, my main argument towards the merge: If it looks like a duck, and people call it a duck, it's probably a duck. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:12, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)

Ascendron at 22:12, 23 February 2011

2011-02-23T22:12:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 23 February 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::: I think we'd be jumping the gun with a merge. Autobot computers are not known for their tendency to sell insurance, regardless of what language they're in, and I'm not entirely sure why Ai Kuruma has come up at all. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 17:05, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::: I think we'd be jumping the gun with a merge. Autobot computers are not known for their tendency to sell insurance, regardless of what language they're in, and I'm not entirely sure why Ai Kuruma has come up at all. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 17:05, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::: I think she's just Car Robots Ai-chan. She's drawn indistinguishably from her, and she's certainly not drawn in an Animated-universe style. (Meaning, regardless of who she is, she's definitely not "from the Animated continuity" or whatever like the top of the page claims.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:11, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::: I think she's just Car Robots Ai-chan. She's drawn indistinguishably from her, and she's certainly not drawn in an Animated-universe style. (Meaning, regardless of who she is, she's definitely not "from the Animated continuity" or whatever like the top of the page claims.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:11, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::: Oh, Allspark Almanac! How could such a wonderful book be the source of such strife! sobs Seriously though, my main argument towards the merge: If it looks like a duck, and people call it a duck, it's probably a duck. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:12, 23 February 2011 (EST)

ItsWalky at 22:11, 23 February 2011

2011-02-23T22:11:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 23 February 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::: Although I could see the argument being made for her being Ai Kuruma... considering she looks exactly like and has the same name as Ai-chan, she's more likely to be Ai-chan... And the thought that Ai Kuruma got kicked off the police force and now has to dress up to sell cars is just too depressing. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 16:44, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::: Although I could see the argument being made for her being Ai Kuruma... considering she looks exactly like and has the same name as Ai-chan, she's more likely to be Ai-chan... And the thought that Ai Kuruma got kicked off the police force and now has to dress up to sell cars is just too depressing. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 16:44, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::: I think we'd be jumping the gun with a merge. Autobot computers are not known for their tendency to sell insurance, regardless of what language they're in, and I'm not entirely sure why Ai Kuruma has come up at all. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 17:05, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::: I think we'd be jumping the gun with a merge. Autobot computers are not known for their tendency to sell insurance, regardless of what language they're in, and I'm not entirely sure why Ai Kuruma has come up at all. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 17:05, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::: I think she's just Car Robots Ai-chan. She's drawn indistinguishably from her, and she's certainly not drawn in an Animated-universe style. (Meaning, regardless of who she is, she's definitely not "from the Animated continuity" or whatever like the top of the page claims.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:11, 23 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 30 October 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Right. Being a character in ALT2Day is almost a guarantee that you're NOT from the Animated continuity family. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 11:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)		: Right. Being a character in ALT2Day is almost a guarantee that you're NOT from the Animated continuity family. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 11:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::But her name is "Ai." Not an acronym? Is she really human? Does T-AI play Ai in the advertisement? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:04, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::But her name is "Ai." Not an acronym? Is she really human? Does T-AI play Ai in the advertisement? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:04, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::: Being from the multiverse and all, it could be that she IS Ai-chan, the [[T-AI]] from the Car Robots continuity (as opposed to the Robots In Disguise Continuity). If this were the case, I would put her on T-AI's page, being from the same multiverse cluster as the RID character. ----[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 12:35, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::: Being from the multiverse and all, it could be that she IS Ai-chan, the [[T-AI (RID)\|T-AI]] from the Car Robots continuity (as opposed to the Robots In Disguise Continuity). If this were the case, I would put her on T-AI's page, being from the same multiverse cluster as the RID character. ----[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 12:35, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::I forgot her Japanese name was Ai-chan. How come that's not on her page? So she's a G1 character. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:06, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::I forgot her Japanese name was Ai-chan. How come that's not on her page? So she's a G1 character. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:06, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::[[T-AI#Foreign names\|It is on her page]]. I would tend to agree with merging this with T-AI's page. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:22, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::[[T-AI (RID)#Foreign names\|It is on her page]]. I would tend to agree with merging this with T-AI's page. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:22, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::Funny, I would merge it with [[Ai Kuruma]]'s page. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::Funny, I would merge it with [[Ai Kuruma]]'s page. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::I actually thought this was T-AI until I went to Bill Forster's page and it just said "Ai", so I assumed it was a new character. I just put it under "Animated" because I didn't know where else. Feel free to merge with either. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 16:34, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::I actually thought this was T-AI until I went to Bill Forster's page and it just said "Ai", so I assumed it was a new character. I just put it under "Animated" because I didn't know where else. Feel free to merge with either. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 16:34, 23 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 23 March 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::::If not, I'd want to know the backstory on how Car Robots Ai got involved with selling insurance. Seems a waste of a good tactical artificial intelligence. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:50, 23 March 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 24 February 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 24 February 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 12 March 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Untitled==
	I'm not sure if we should go to the bother of considering this a separate character from RiD's T-AI. She does, after all, appear on the multiversal "Alt2Day" page. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:31, 23 February 2011 (EST)		I'm not sure if we should go to the bother of considering this a separate character from RiD's T-AI. She does, after all, appear on the multiversal "Alt2Day" page. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:31, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	: Right. Being a character in ALT2Day is almost a guarantee that you're NOT from the Animated continuity family. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 11:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)		: Right. Being a character in ALT2Day is almost a guarantee that you're NOT from the Animated continuity family. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 11:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::But her name is "Ai." Not an acronym? Is she really human? Does T-AI play Ai in the advertisement? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:04, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::But her name is "Ai." Not an acronym? Is she really human? Does T-AI play Ai in the advertisement? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:04, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::: Being from the multiverse and all, it could be that she IS Ai-chan, the [[T-AI ~~(RID)~~\|T-AI]] from the Car Robots continuity (as opposed to the Robots In Disguise Continuity). If this were the case, I would put her on T-AI's page, being from the same multiverse cluster as the RID character. ----[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 12:35, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::: Being from the multiverse and all, it could be that she IS Ai-chan, the [[T-AI\|T-AI]] from the Car Robots continuity (as opposed to the Robots In Disguise Continuity). If this were the case, I would put her on T-AI's page, being from the same multiverse cluster as the RID character. ----[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 12:35, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::I forgot her Japanese name was Ai-chan. How come that's not on her page? So she's a G1 character. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:06, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::I forgot her Japanese name was Ai-chan. How come that's not on her page? So she's a G1 character. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:06, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::[[T-AI ~~(RID)~~#Foreign names\|It is on her page]]. I would tend to agree with merging this with T-AI's page. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:22, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::[[T-AI#Foreign names\|It is on her page]]. I would tend to agree with merging this with T-AI's page. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:22, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::Funny, I would merge it with [[Ai Kuruma]]'s page. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::Funny, I would merge it with [[Ai Kuruma]]'s page. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::I actually thought this was T-AI until I went to Bill Forster's page and it just said "Ai", so I assumed it was a new character. I just put it under "Animated" because I didn't know where else. Feel free to merge with either. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 16:34, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::I actually thought this was T-AI until I went to Bill Forster's page and it just said "Ai", so I assumed it was a new character. I just put it under "Animated" because I didn't know where else. Feel free to merge with either. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 16:34, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::: Although I could see the argument being made for her being Ai Kuruma... considering she looks exactly like and has the same name as Ai-chan, she's more likely to be Ai-chan... And the thought that Ai Kuruma got kicked off the police force and now has to dress up to sell cars is just too depressing. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 16:44, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::: Although I could see the argument being made for her being Ai Kuruma... considering she looks exactly like and has the same name as Ai-chan, she's more likely to be Ai-chan... And the thought that Ai Kuruma got kicked off the police force and now has to dress up to sell cars is just too depressing. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 16:44, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::: I think we'd be jumping the gun with a merge. Autobot computers are not known for their tendency to sell insurance, regardless of what language they're in, and I'm not entirely sure why Ai Kuruma has come up at all. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 17:05, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::: I think we'd be jumping the gun with a merge. Autobot computers are not known for their tendency to sell insurance, regardless of what language they're in, and I'm not entirely sure why Ai Kuruma has come up at all. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 17:05, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::: I think she's just Car Robots Ai-chan. She's drawn indistinguishably from her, and she's certainly not drawn in an Animated-universe style. (Meaning, regardless of who she is, she's definitely not "from the Animated continuity" or whatever like the top of the page claims.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:11, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::: I think she's just Car Robots Ai-chan. She's drawn indistinguishably from her, and she's certainly not drawn in an Animated-universe style. (Meaning, regardless of who she is, she's definitely not "from the Animated continuity" or whatever like the top of the page claims.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:11, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::: Oh, Allspark Almanac! How could such a wonderful book be the source of such strife! sobs Seriously though, my main argument towards the merge: If it looks like a duck, and people call it a duck, it's probably a duck. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:12, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::: Oh, Allspark Almanac! How could such a wonderful book be the source of such strife! sobsSeriously though, my main argument towards the merge: If it looks like a duck, and people call it a duck, it's probably a duck. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:12, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::Except for when we're talking about [[Red waitress Transformer\|the ''other'' T-AI doppelganger]], of course. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:14, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::: That only looks somewhat similar like a duck, and nobody in-fiction has called her a duck. So she might've only had the possibility of being a duck if authorial intent had called her a duck, which it didn't. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 17:17, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::Are we sure she's a real person in-universe, and not just a mascot? Like Jack, the "owner" of Jack-In-A-Box? -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:59, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::Also very possible, I would say. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 23 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::If not, I'd want to know the backstory on how Car Robots Ai got involved with selling insurance. Seems a waste of a good tactical artificial intelligence. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:50, 23 March 2011 (EDT)		::::::::::::::If not, I'd want to know the backstory on how Car Robots Ai got involved with selling insurance. Seems a waste of a good tactical artificial intelligence. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:50, 23 March 2011 (EDT)