Talk:Air Raid (Movie) - Revision history

LV: /* Air Raid */

2012-11-17T00:52:50Z

Air Raid

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 17 November 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)		: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	:: I won't fight an executive decision, especially one that draws out so much passive aggressive insulting of long-time editors, but no reason was given when the page was split. Not on talk pages or in edit notes. Just blanked without a word as to why. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 18:15, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:: I won't fight an executive decision, especially one that draws out so much passive aggressive insulting of long-time editors, but no reason was given when the page was split. Not on talk pages or in edit notes. Just blanked without a word as to why. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 18:15, 16 November 2012 (EST)
			:::You're right about there being no discussion here (although there clearly is a "word as to why"; the reason is that he is a different guy). I must have had the conversation elsewhere. That's on me, and I apologize for claiming it was discussed here. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 19:52, 16 November 2012 (EST)

Carrion: /* Air Raid */

2012-11-16T23:15:23Z

Air Raid

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 16 November 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Since I'm not going to get into a revert war until we both get blocked for two weeks, I'm just going to propose that "is clearly a different character" outranks "has no obvious relationship except sharing G1 namesake's tech spec" here, and furthermore that all "same tech spec numbers" has ever gotten us on the wiki is nonsense like the Evac page merge or Movie and Goldbox Payloads being declared the same character. Also I propose that if you're going to fuck with a page, you actually make sure it doesn't contradict the notes, and also that you learn what "repurpose" means on this wiki. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 16:26, 16 November 2012 (EST)		Since I'm not going to get into a revert war until we both get blocked for two weeks, I'm just going to propose that "is clearly a different character" outranks "has no obvious relationship except sharing G1 namesake's tech spec" here, and furthermore that all "same tech spec numbers" has ever gotten us on the wiki is nonsense like the Evac page merge or Movie and Goldbox Payloads being declared the same character. Also I propose that if you're going to fuck with a page, you actually make sure it doesn't contradict the notes, and also that you learn what "repurpose" means on this wiki. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 16:26, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)		: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)
			:: I won't fight an executive decision, especially one that draws out so much passive aggressive insulting of long-time editors, but no reason was given when the page was split. Not on talk pages or in edit notes. Just blanked without a word as to why. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 18:15, 16 November 2012 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Air Raid */

2012-11-16T21:45:36Z

Air Raid

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 16 November 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	==Air Raid==		==Air Raid==
	Since I'm not going to get into a revert war until we both get blocked for two weeks, I'm just going to propose that "is clearly a different character" outranks "has no obvious relationship except sharing G1 namesake's tech spec" here, and furthermore that all "same tech spec numbers" has ever gotten us on the wiki is nonsense like the Evac page merge or Movie and Goldbox Payloads being declared the same character. Also I propose that if you're going to fuck with a page, you actually make sure it doesn't contradict the notes, and also that you learn what "repurpose" means on this wiki. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 16:26, 16 November 2012 (EST)		Since I'm not going to get into a revert war until we both get blocked for two weeks, I'm just going to propose that "is clearly a different character" outranks "has no obvious relationship except sharing G1 namesake's tech spec" here, and furthermore that all "same tech spec numbers" has ever gotten us on the wiki is nonsense like the Evac page merge or Movie and Goldbox Payloads being declared the same character. Also I propose that if you're going to fuck with a page, you actually make sure it doesn't contradict the notes, and also that you learn what "repurpose" means on this wiki. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 16:26, 16 November 2012 (EST)
			: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)

LV at 21:26, 16 November 2012

2012-11-16T21:26:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 16 November 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Is the last line of this article ''supposed'' to be "boom boom SEXY TIME"?--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:18, 7 August 2011 (EDT)		Is the last line of this article ''supposed'' to be "boom boom SEXY TIME"?--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:18, 7 August 2011 (EDT)
	:It's a silly comment on what "Air''laid''" might refer to. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 19:22, 16 September 2011 (EDT)		:It's a silly comment on what "Air''laid''" might refer to. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 19:22, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

			==Air Raid==
			Since I'm not going to get into a revert war until we both get blocked for two weeks, I'm just going to propose that "is clearly a different character" outranks "has no obvious relationship except sharing G1 namesake's tech spec" here, and furthermore that all "same tech spec numbers" has ever gotten us on the wiki is nonsense like the Evac page merge or Movie and Goldbox Payloads being declared the same character. Also I propose that if you're going to fuck with a page, you actually make sure it doesn't contradict the notes, and also that you learn what "repurpose" means on this wiki. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 16:26, 16 November 2012 (EST)

Abates: /* Ha */

2011-12-31T09:05:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 31 December 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	::::::::I think that the Movie Air Raid is also the green DOTM Air Raid while the ROTF superion pack is the same as the gray DOTM Air Raid. I mean look at them, green & some yellow & black in the middle(movie), green & some black & yellow in the middle (DOTM new mold), then there's gray & red with some green (ROTF superion pack), then gray & red with some green (DOTM first mold) [[~~Use~~:Jazzerprime]] 8:22, 22 December 2011		::::::::I think that the Movie Air Raid is also the green DOTM Air Raid while the ROTF superion pack is the same as the gray DOTM Air Raid. I mean look at them, green & some yellow & black in the middle(movie), green & some black & yellow in the middle (DOTM new mold), then there's gray & red with some green (ROTF superion pack), then gray & red with some green (DOTM first mold) [[User:Jazzerprime]] 8:22, 22 December 2011

	== Last line ==		== Last line ==

Jazzerprime: /Ha/same guys

2011-12-22T12:23:58Z

Ha: same guys

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 22 December 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
			::::::::I think that the Movie Air Raid is also the green DOTM Air Raid while the ROTF superion pack is the same as the gray DOTM Air Raid. I mean look at them, green & some yellow & black in the middle(movie), green & some black & yellow in the middle (DOTM new mold), then there's gray & red with some green (ROTF superion pack), then gray & red with some green (DOTM first mold) [[Use:Jazzerprime]] 8:22, 22 December 2011

	== Last line ==		== Last line ==

Andrusi: /* Last line */

2011-09-16T23:22:05Z

Last line

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 16 September 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Is the last line of this article ''supposed'' to be "boom boom SEXY TIME"?--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:18, 7 August 2011 (EDT)		Is the last line of this article ''supposed'' to be "boom boom SEXY TIME"?--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:18, 7 August 2011 (EDT)
			:It's a silly comment on what "Air''laid''" might refer to. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 19:22, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

Primo: /* Last line */

2011-08-09T04:43:28Z

Last line

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 9 August 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	== Last line ==		== Last line ==

	Is the last line of this article ''supposed'' to be "~~Boom~~ boom SEXY TIME"?--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:18, 7 August 2011 (EDT)		Is the last line of this article ''supposed'' to be "boom boom SEXY TIME"?--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:18, 7 August 2011 (EDT)

Primo: /* Last line */ new section

2011-08-07T20:18:56Z

Last line: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 7 August 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)

			== Last line ==

			Is the last line of this article ''supposed'' to be "Boom boom SEXY TIME"?--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:18, 7 August 2011 (EDT)

Interrobang at 17:51, 16 June 2011

2011-06-16T17:51:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 16 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	==Ha==		==Ha==

	I have no great objection to it existing as it is, but this page is a hilarious dumping ground of unrelated guys called Air Raid, not that any of them have much to say about them. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 13:08, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		I have no great objection to it existing as it is, but this page is a hilarious dumping ground of unrelated guys called Air Raid, not that any of them have much to say about them. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 13:08, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	:Well if there is nothing to say about them there is no way to distinguish that they are unrelated, therefore it is simpler to assume that all of these movieverse Air Raids are the same guy. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:12, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		:Well if there is nothing to say about them there is no way to distinguish that they are unrelated, therefore it is simpler to assume that all of these movieverse Air Raids are the same guy. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:12, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 17 November 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)		: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	:: I won't fight an executive decision, especially one that draws out so much passive aggressive insulting of long-time editors, but no reason was given when the page was split. Not on talk pages or in edit notes. Just blanked without a word as to why. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 18:15, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:: I won't fight an executive decision, especially one that draws out so much passive aggressive insulting of long-time editors, but no reason was given when the page was split. Not on talk pages or in edit notes. Just blanked without a word as to why. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 18:15, 16 November 2012 (EST)
			:::You're right about there being no discussion here (although there clearly is a "word as to why"; the reason is that he is a different guy). I must have had the conversation elsewhere. That's on me, and I apologize for claiming it was discussed here. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 19:52, 16 November 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 16 November 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Since I'm not going to get into a revert war until we both get blocked for two weeks, I'm just going to propose that "is clearly a different character" outranks "has no obvious relationship except sharing G1 namesake's tech spec" here, and furthermore that all "same tech spec numbers" has ever gotten us on the wiki is nonsense like the Evac page merge or Movie and Goldbox Payloads being declared the same character. Also I propose that if you're going to fuck with a page, you actually make sure it doesn't contradict the notes, and also that you learn what "repurpose" means on this wiki. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 16:26, 16 November 2012 (EST)		Since I'm not going to get into a revert war until we both get blocked for two weeks, I'm just going to propose that "is clearly a different character" outranks "has no obvious relationship except sharing G1 namesake's tech spec" here, and furthermore that all "same tech spec numbers" has ever gotten us on the wiki is nonsense like the Evac page merge or Movie and Goldbox Payloads being declared the same character. Also I propose that if you're going to fuck with a page, you actually make sure it doesn't contradict the notes, and also that you learn what "repurpose" means on this wiki. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 16:26, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)		: Yeah, that was pretty terrible re-integration, considering the mess of lies it makes the Notes section. And again, yes, that's not what repurposing means. And we split this page for a reason. Don't merge it back without convincing us. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:45, 16 November 2012 (EST)
			:: I won't fight an executive decision, especially one that draws out so much passive aggressive insulting of long-time editors, but no reason was given when the page was split. Not on talk pages or in edit notes. Just blanked without a word as to why. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 18:15, 16 November 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 16 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	==Ha==		==Ha==

	I have no great objection to it existing as it is, but this page is a hilarious dumping ground of unrelated guys called Air Raid, not that any of them have much to say about them. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 13:08, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		I have no great objection to it existing as it is, but this page is a hilarious dumping ground of unrelated guys called Air Raid, not that any of them have much to say about them. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 13:08, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	:Well if there is nothing to say about them there is no way to distinguish that they are unrelated, therefore it is simpler to assume that all of these movieverse Air Raids are the same guy. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:12, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		:Well if there is nothing to say about them there is no way to distinguish that they are unrelated, therefore it is simpler to assume that all of these movieverse Air Raids are the same guy. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:12, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		::He agrees. He's just saying that it's funny. Don't gotta pitch it to him. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:19, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::Still, I think having four independently-created incarnations of Air Raid on a page warrants a note. If only to point out the hilarity and the fact that people aren't very creative with names. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:51, 16 June 2011 (EDT)

Talk:Air Raid (Movie) - Revision history

LV: /* Air Raid */

Carrion: /* Air Raid */

ItsWalky: /* Air Raid */

LV at 21:26, 16 November 2012

Abates: /* Ha */

Jazzerprime: /*Ha*/same guys

Andrusi: /* Last line */

Primo: /* Last line */

Primo: /* Last line */ new section

Interrobang at 17:51, 16 June 2011

Jazzerprime: /Ha/same guys