Talk:Arcee (G1)/2005 IDW continuity - Revision history

Saix: /* Wreckers */

2019-06-20T18:18:01Z

Wreckers

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 20 June 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, they're all on the cover of The Wreckers Saga trade too. Scoop is never directly referred to as a Wrecker either, and he certainly doesn't fit the profile. Ironfist wasn't formally voted in as a Wrecker either and referred to as a hanger-on by Topspin. I think Arcee has more cred than either of them as a Wrecker, having been one in a previous continuity and actually possessing the skill set for it. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:51, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		::::Yeah, they're all on the cover of The Wreckers Saga trade too. Scoop is never directly referred to as a Wrecker either, and he certainly doesn't fit the profile. Ironfist wasn't formally voted in as a Wrecker either and referred to as a hanger-on by Topspin. I think Arcee has more cred than either of them as a Wrecker, having been one in a previous continuity and actually possessing the skill set for it. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:51, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			:::::Fair enough. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:18, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

Nu-Priest: /* Wreckers */

2019-06-20T17:51:44Z

Wreckers

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 20 June 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
	:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			::::Yeah, they're all on the cover of The Wreckers Saga trade too. Scoop is never directly referred to as a Wrecker either, and he certainly doesn't fit the profile. Ironfist wasn't formally voted in as a Wrecker either and referred to as a hanger-on by Topspin. I think Arcee has more cred than either of them as a Wrecker, having been one in a previous continuity and actually possessing the skill set for it. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:51, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Wreckers */

2019-06-20T17:28:51Z

Wreckers

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 20 June 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
	::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

Saix: /* Wreckers */

2019-06-20T17:25:43Z

Wreckers

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 20 June 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	When did she identify herself as a member of the team? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:21, 19 June 2019 (EDT)		When did she identify herself as a member of the team? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:21, 19 June 2019 (EDT)
	:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

Nu-Priest: /* Wreckers */

2019-06-20T10:41:15Z

Wreckers

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 20 June 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:

	When did she identify herself as a member of the team? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:21, 19 June 2019 (EDT)		When did she identify herself as a member of the team? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:21, 19 June 2019 (EDT)
			:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

Saix: /* Wreckers */ new section

2019-06-20T02:21:33Z

Wreckers: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 20 June 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Arcee seems to wield energy blades. Is she the only character to do so or are there any others? [[User:Battlemaster\|Battlemaster]] ([[User talk:Battlemaster\|talk]]) 18:50, 7 November 2018 (EST)		Arcee seems to wield energy blades. Is she the only character to do so or are there any others? [[User:Battlemaster\|Battlemaster]] ([[User talk:Battlemaster\|talk]]) 18:50, 7 November 2018 (EST)
	: Very many. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:15, 7 November 2018 (EST)		: Very many. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:15, 7 November 2018 (EST)

			== Wreckers ==

			When did she identify herself as a member of the team? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:21, 19 June 2019 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW continuity (2005) to Talk:Arcee (G1)/2005 IDW continuity

2019-04-05T17:51:51Z

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW continuity (2005) to Talk:Arcee (G1)/2005 IDW continuity

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:51, 5 April 2019
(No difference)

Locoman: Grum moved page Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW 2005 continuity to Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW continuity (2005)

2019-04-03T11:33:44Z

Grum moved page Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW 2005 continuity to Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW continuity (2005)

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:33, 3 April 2019
(No difference)

Mammalian Verisimilitude: Mammalian Verisimilitude moved page Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW Generation 1 continuity to Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW 2005 continuity: It's not the only IDW Generation 1 continuity any more.

2019-03-28T00:32:23Z

Mammalian Verisimilitude moved page Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW Generation 1 continuity to Talk:Arcee (G1)/IDW 2005 continuity: It's not the only IDW Generation 1 continuity any more.

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:32, 28 March 2019
(No difference)

ItsWalky at 01:15, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T01:15:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 8 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Arcee seems to wield energy blades. Is she the only character to do so or are there any others? [[User:Battlemaster\|Battlemaster]] ([[User talk:Battlemaster\|talk]]) 18:50, 7 November 2018 (EST)		Arcee seems to wield energy blades. Is she the only character to do so or are there any others? [[User:Battlemaster\|Battlemaster]] ([[User talk:Battlemaster\|talk]]) 18:50, 7 November 2018 (EST)
			: Very many. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:15, 7 November 2018 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 20 June 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, they're all on the cover of The Wreckers Saga trade too. Scoop is never directly referred to as a Wrecker either, and he certainly doesn't fit the profile. Ironfist wasn't formally voted in as a Wrecker either and referred to as a hanger-on by Topspin. I think Arcee has more cred than either of them as a Wrecker, having been one in a previous continuity and actually possessing the skill set for it. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:51, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		::::Yeah, they're all on the cover of The Wreckers Saga trade too. Scoop is never directly referred to as a Wrecker either, and he certainly doesn't fit the profile. Ironfist wasn't formally voted in as a Wrecker either and referred to as a hanger-on by Topspin. I think Arcee has more cred than either of them as a Wrecker, having been one in a previous continuity and actually possessing the skill set for it. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:51, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			:::::Fair enough. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:18, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 20 June 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
	:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			::::Yeah, they're all on the cover of The Wreckers Saga trade too. Scoop is never directly referred to as a Wrecker either, and he certainly doesn't fit the profile. Ironfist wasn't formally voted in as a Wrecker either and referred to as a hanger-on by Topspin. I think Arcee has more cred than either of them as a Wrecker, having been one in a previous continuity and actually possessing the skill set for it. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:51, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 20 June 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
	::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			:::Roche has drawn them in his collage of "Every IDW Wrecker" which includes guys like Scoop, so I figure it's at the very least intended. Don't really care enough to say that it should remain this way, though. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 13:28, 20 June 2019 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 20 June 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	When did she identify herself as a member of the team? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:21, 19 June 2019 (EDT)		When did she identify herself as a member of the team? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:21, 19 June 2019 (EDT)
	:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)		:I think it was pretty much implied that her, Stakeout, and Hubcap were at the very least honorary Wreckers just by tagging along with Springer. Springer only really "invites" Hubcap, ("Get your Wrecker on, you're coming with us.") but if freakin' HUBCAP was in, there's no reason Arcee wouldn't be. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 06:41, 20 June 2019 (EDT)
			::I mean, that sounds like a forced reading the wiki is putting on the story. If they're not formally Wreckers or described as such, then they're not Wreckers, just teaming up with them on a particular mission. Just because Hubcap got in doesn't mean anything in regards to Arcee and Stakeout. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:25, 20 June 2019 (EDT)