Talk:Authorial intent - Revision history

Khajidha: /* Google */

2018-04-11T17:26:42Z

Google

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 11 April 2018
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Since it hasn't been noted here yet, Google is currently using this article for the "official" definition at the top of the search result for "authorial intent" instead of Wikipedia's definition. ([https://twitter.com/BenKuchera/status/910517322531655680 credit]) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:29, 26 September 2017 (EDT)		Since it hasn't been noted here yet, Google is currently using this article for the "official" definition at the top of the search result for "authorial intent" instead of Wikipedia's definition. ([https://twitter.com/BenKuchera/status/910517322531655680 credit]) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:29, 26 September 2017 (EDT)
			:Considering how useless and circular WP's definition is, I'm not at all surprised. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 13:26, 11 April 2018 (EDT)

Abates: /* Google */ new section

2017-09-26T21:29:03Z

Google: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 26 September 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:Apparently the actual term is "[[wikipedia:Authorial intentionality\|Authorial intentionality]]", just to be totally convoluted. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:06, 4 May 2009 (EDT)		:Apparently the actual term is "[[wikipedia:Authorial intentionality\|Authorial intentionality]]", just to be totally convoluted. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:06, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
	::Even in the context of that Wikipedia article, they use the phrase in different tenses - "Authorial intent" is used in the first sentence of the "Literary theory" section (and "Authorial intention" is also used lower down). It's a perfectly valid phrase. Whereas "author" is not an adjective, and the article at no point uses it as an adjective - the adjectival form is "authorial" [It does use "author's intent", which I gave as another alternative, but discarded because unnecessary punctuation marks in titles should be avoided - for the apostophe specifically, anyone editing in M$ Word without altering the default setting would have it turned into a "rich text" equivalent, which would break links to the page; and if there's any more database glitches (allspark forfend), the single quotation mark/apostophe is one of the characters that needs "escaped" with a backslash by a lot of stuff where it's a reserved character, and that caused some problems in the last recovery with pages being uploaded to "example\'s"-type places. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 19:52, 4 May 2009 (EDT)		::Even in the context of that Wikipedia article, they use the phrase in different tenses - "Authorial intent" is used in the first sentence of the "Literary theory" section (and "Authorial intention" is also used lower down). It's a perfectly valid phrase. Whereas "author" is not an adjective, and the article at no point uses it as an adjective - the adjectival form is "authorial" [It does use "author's intent", which I gave as another alternative, but discarded because unnecessary punctuation marks in titles should be avoided - for the apostophe specifically, anyone editing in M$ Word without altering the default setting would have it turned into a "rich text" equivalent, which would break links to the page; and if there's any more database glitches (allspark forfend), the single quotation mark/apostophe is one of the characters that needs "escaped" with a backslash by a lot of stuff where it's a reserved character, and that caused some problems in the last recovery with pages being uploaded to "example\'s"-type places. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 19:52, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

			== Google ==

			Since it hasn't been noted here yet, Google is currently using this article for the "official" definition at the top of the search result for "authorial intent" instead of Wikipedia's definition. ([https://twitter.com/BenKuchera/status/910517322531655680 credit]) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:29, 26 September 2017 (EDT)

SanityOrMadness: /* Author intent. */

2009-05-04T23:52:57Z

Author intent.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 4 May 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)		Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
	:Apparently the actual term is "[[wikipedia:Authorial intentionality\|Authorial intentionality]]", just to be totally convoluted. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:06, 4 May 2009 (EDT)		:Apparently the actual term is "[[wikipedia:Authorial intentionality\|Authorial intentionality]]", just to be totally convoluted. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:06, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
			::Even in the context of that Wikipedia article, they use the phrase in different tenses - "Authorial intent" is used in the first sentence of the "Literary theory" section (and "Authorial intention" is also used lower down). It's a perfectly valid phrase. Whereas "author" is not an adjective, and the article at no point uses it as an adjective - the adjectival form is "authorial" [It does use "author's intent", which I gave as another alternative, but discarded because unnecessary punctuation marks in titles should be avoided - for the apostophe specifically, anyone editing in M$ Word without altering the default setting would have it turned into a "rich text" equivalent, which would break links to the page; and if there's any more database glitches (allspark forfend), the single quotation mark/apostophe is one of the characters that needs "escaped" with a backslash by a lot of stuff where it's a reserved character, and that caused some problems in the last recovery with pages being uploaded to "example\'s"-type places. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 19:52, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

Jeysie: /* Author intent. */

2009-05-04T23:06:40Z

Author intent.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 4 May 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)		Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
			:Apparently the actual term is "[[wikipedia:Authorial intentionality\|Authorial intentionality]]", just to be totally convoluted. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:06, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Author intent. */ new section

2009-05-04T22:53:56Z

Author intent.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 4 May 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::How do we handle that? looks Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky!		:::::How do we handle that? looks Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky!
	:::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)		:::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

			== Author intent. ==

			Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

SanityOrMadness: Talk:Author intent moved to Talk:Authorial intent: It's either "Authorial intent" or "Author's intent", not "Author intent". I prefer the first.

2009-05-04T22:33:49Z

Talk:Author intent moved to Talk:Authorial intent: It's either "Authorial intent" or "Author's intent", not "Author intent". I prefer the first.

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:33, 4 May 2009
(No difference)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-24T14:32:24Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 24 March 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::::Oh hey, nice to know! He's a cipher, so I suppose that author intent informs our read of this blank area of continuity.		:::::Oh hey, nice to know! He's a cipher, so I suppose that author intent informs our read of this blank area of continuity.
	:::::How do we handle that? looks Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky!		:::::How do we handle that? looks Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky!
	:::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		:::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Derik at 20:15, 22 February 2008

2008-02-22T20:15:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 22 February 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)		::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
	:::According to author intent ([[Dan Khanna]]), he's a new form for [[Ramulus]]. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:::According to author intent ([[Dan Khanna]]), he's a new form for [[Ramulus]]. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

			:::::Oh hey, nice to know! He's a cipher, so I suppose that author intent informs our read of this blank area of continuity.
			:::::How do we handle that? looks Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky!
			:::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

ItsWalky at 20:03, 22 February 2008

2008-02-22T20:03:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 22 February 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)		: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

	::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
			:::According to author intent ([[Dan Khanna]]), he's a new form for [[Ramulus]]. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Derik at 19:33, 22 February 2008

2008-02-22T19:33:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 22 February 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Man, I'm gonna HAVE to add something about the Star Drive/Nemesis thing. Because hooboy, the ridiculous. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 20:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)		Man, I'm gonna HAVE to add something about the Star Drive/Nemesis thing. Because hooboy, the ridiculous. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 20:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

	: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

			::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 4 May 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)		Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
	:Apparently the actual term is "[[wikipedia:Authorial intentionality\|Authorial intentionality]]", just to be totally convoluted. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:06, 4 May 2009 (EDT)		:Apparently the actual term is "[[wikipedia:Authorial intentionality\|Authorial intentionality]]", just to be totally convoluted. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:06, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
			::Even in the context of that Wikipedia article, they use the phrase in different tenses - "Authorial intent" is used in the first sentence of the "Literary theory" section (and "Authorial intention" is also used lower down). It's a perfectly valid phrase. Whereas "author" is not an adjective, and the article at no point uses it as an adjective - the adjectival form is "authorial" [It does use "author's intent", which I gave as another alternative, but discarded because unnecessary punctuation marks in titles should be avoided - for the apostophe specifically, anyone editing in M$ Word without altering the default setting would have it turned into a "rich text" equivalent, which would break links to the page; and if there's any more database glitches (allspark forfend), the single quotation mark/apostophe is one of the characters that needs "escaped" with a backslash by a lot of stuff where it's a reserved character, and that caused some problems in the last recovery with pages being uploaded to "example\'s"-type places. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 19:52, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 22 February 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)		::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
	:::According to author intent ([[Dan Khanna]]), he's a new form for [[Ramulus]]. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:::According to author intent ([[Dan Khanna]]), he's a new form for [[Ramulus]]. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

			:::::Oh hey, nice to know! He's a cipher, so I suppose that author intent informs our read of this blank area of continuity.
			:::::How do we handle that? looks Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky!
			:::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 22 February 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)		: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

	::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
			:::According to author intent ([[Dan Khanna]]), he's a new form for [[Ramulus]]. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 22 February 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Man, I'm gonna HAVE to add something about the Star Drive/Nemesis thing. Because hooboy, the ridiculous. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 20:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)		Man, I'm gonna HAVE to add something about the Star Drive/Nemesis thing. Because hooboy, the ridiculous. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 20:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

	: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		: Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

			::Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>