Talk:Beast mode - Revision history

KrytenKoro: /* G1 Dinobots and Predacons */

2013-03-15T13:49:33Z

G1 Dinobots and Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 15 March 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Do ''G1'' Dinobots and Predacons' alternate mode count as beast mode?　--'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:23, 25 September 2011 (EDT)		Do ''G1'' Dinobots and Predacons' alternate mode count as beast mode?　--'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:23, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
			:Well the Dinobots are considered Primitives at least, and the IDW comics portrayed the Dinobots as using the same basic process as the Beast Warriors.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 09:49, 15 March 2013 (EDT)

	== New section or New article? ==		== New section or New article? ==

Altercron: /* New section or New article? */

2013-03-15T05:30:08Z

New section or New article?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 15 March 2013
Line 17:		Line 17:
	== New section or New article? ==		== New section or New article? ==
	Hey guys, I'm kinda new to actively editing around here, so I'm not sure what the protocol is about this. I was looking at the [[Talk:Technorganic#List_of_BW_physiology_traits\|list of examples about Beast Wars organic tech]] archived by [[User:Repowers]] from some earlier major edit of [[Technorganic\|that article]]. It seems to me that the topic of the ambiguous canon regarding the "is BW-era beast mode flesh organic or synthetic?" question is worth a bit more discussion than currently featured in the [[Technorganic#.22Technorganic.22_in_Beast_Wars\|Beast Wars subsection of the Technorganic article]], PLUS it seems like [[Beast mode\|this]] would be a more appropriate page for the discussion than that is. But I'm not sure if other users would prefer to have this kind of content here on this "Beast Mode" page, or to create a new one called something like "Beast Mode(/Wars?) Technology"?		Hey guys, I'm kinda new to actively editing around here, so I'm not sure what the protocol is about this. I was looking at the [[Talk:Technorganic#List_of_BW_physiology_traits\|list of examples about Beast Wars organic tech]] archived by [[User:Repowers]] from some earlier major edit of [[Technorganic\|that article]]. It seems to me that the topic of the ambiguous canon regarding the "is BW-era beast mode flesh organic or synthetic?" question is worth a bit more discussion than currently featured in the [[Technorganic#.22Technorganic.22_in_Beast_Wars\|Beast Wars subsection of the Technorganic article]], PLUS it seems like [[Beast mode\|this]] would be a more appropriate page for the discussion than that is. But I'm not sure if other users would prefer to have this kind of content here on this "Beast Mode" page, or to create a new one called something like "Beast Mode(/Wars?) Technology"?

			I think it would fit very well here on this page. But that's just me and I'm a noobie. --[[User:Altercron\|Altercron]] 01:30, 15 March 2013 (EDT)

TrapRat at 12:16, 26 November 2011

2011-11-26T12:16:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 26 November 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Do ''G1'' Dinobots and Predacons' alternate mode count as beast mode?　--'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:23, 25 September 2011 (EDT)		Do ''G1'' Dinobots and Predacons' alternate mode count as beast mode?　--'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:23, 25 September 2011 (EDT)

			== New section or New article? ==
			Hey guys, I'm kinda new to actively editing around here, so I'm not sure what the protocol is about this. I was looking at the [[Talk:Technorganic#List_of_BW_physiology_traits\|list of examples about Beast Wars organic tech]] archived by [[User:Repowers]] from some earlier major edit of [[Technorganic\|that article]]. It seems to me that the topic of the ambiguous canon regarding the "is BW-era beast mode flesh organic or synthetic?" question is worth a bit more discussion than currently featured in the [[Technorganic#.22Technorganic.22_in_Beast_Wars\|Beast Wars subsection of the Technorganic article]], PLUS it seems like [[Beast mode\|this]] would be a more appropriate page for the discussion than that is. But I'm not sure if other users would prefer to have this kind of content here on this "Beast Mode" page, or to create a new one called something like "Beast Mode(/Wars?) Technology"?

TX55: /* G1 Dinobots and Predacons */ new section

2011-09-25T14:23:32Z

G1 Dinobots and Predacons: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 25 September 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Should Scorponok and Ravage be included here, 'cause their pages describe their alt modes as beast modes. [[Special:Contributions/96.61.43.230\|96.61.43.230]] 09:26, 30 January 2010 (EST)		Should Scorponok and Ravage be included here, 'cause their pages describe their alt modes as beast modes. [[Special:Contributions/96.61.43.230\|96.61.43.230]] 09:26, 30 January 2010 (EST)
	:To my knowledge the movies don't give any fictional insight into beast modes (why they have beast modes, etc) and this page isn't a list of Transformers with beast modes, so I don't think the movies have anything to say about beast modes really. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 10:13, 30 January 2010 (EST)		:To my knowledge the movies don't give any fictional insight into beast modes (why they have beast modes, etc) and this page isn't a list of Transformers with beast modes, so I don't think the movies have anything to say about beast modes really. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 10:13, 30 January 2010 (EST)

			== ''G1'' Dinobots and Predacons ==

			Do ''G1'' Dinobots and Predacons' alternate mode count as beast mode?　--'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:23, 25 September 2011 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Movie */

2010-01-30T15:13:58Z

Movie

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 30 January 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Should Scorponok and Ravage be included here, 'cause their pages describe their alt modes as beast modes. [[Special:Contributions/96.61.43.230\|96.61.43.230]] 09:26, 30 January 2010 (EST)		Should Scorponok and Ravage be included here, 'cause their pages describe their alt modes as beast modes. [[Special:Contributions/96.61.43.230\|96.61.43.230]] 09:26, 30 January 2010 (EST)
			:To my knowledge the movies don't give any fictional insight into beast modes (why they have beast modes, etc) and this page isn't a list of Transformers with beast modes, so I don't think the movies have anything to say about beast modes really. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 10:13, 30 January 2010 (EST)

96.61.43.230: /* Movie */ new section

2010-01-30T14:26:24Z

Movie: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 30 January 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? [[User:Eire]] 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC)		Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? [[User:Eire]] 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC)
	:I agree. That's also what it says in the "picsneeded" box. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)		:I agree. That's also what it says in the "picsneeded" box. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)

			== Movie ==

			Should Scorponok and Ravage be included here, 'cause their pages describe their alt modes as beast modes. [[Special:Contributions/96.61.43.230\|96.61.43.230]] 09:26, 30 January 2010 (EST)

Starfield at 21:56, 5 November 2009

2009-11-05T21:56:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 5 November 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? [[User:Eire]] 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC)		Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? [[User:Eire]] 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC)
			:I agree. That's also what it says in the "picsneeded" box. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)

148.197.5.20 at 21:52, 5 November 2009

2009-11-05T21:52:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 5 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Why was the redirect to [[alternate mode]] deleted? That is where beast modes are discussed. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:46, 6 May 2009 (EDT)		Why was the redirect to [[alternate mode]] deleted? That is where beast modes are discussed. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:46, 6 May 2009 (EDT)

			==Main Image==

			Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? [[User:Eire]] 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC)

Starfield: New page: Why was the redirect to alternate mode deleted? That is where beast modes are discussed. - ~~~~

2009-05-07T02:46:57Z

New page: Why was the redirect to alternate mode deleted? That is where beast modes are discussed. - ~~~~

New page

Why was the redirect to [[alternate mode]] deleted? That is where beast modes are discussed. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 22:46, 6 May 2009 (EDT)