Talk:Big Red (G1) - Revision history

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 at 15:13, 2 January 2018

2018-01-02T15:13:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 2 January 2018
Line 21:		Line 21:
	So shouldn't the "(G1)" be removed from the title, since this is the only Big Red page? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 08:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)		So shouldn't the "(G1)" be removed from the title, since this is the only Big Red page? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 08:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)
	:The soda brand had a Transformers promotion for Age of Extinction, its just nobody made that page yet. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:44, 2 January 2018 (EST)		:The soda brand had a Transformers promotion for Age of Extinction, its just nobody made that page yet. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:44, 2 January 2018 (EST)
			::Well if you're in the know, then might it be useful to stick a disambig up? I, for one, have no idea this existed. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 10:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)

Escargon: Escargon moved page Talk:Big Red to Talk:Big Red (G1) over redirect: See talk page

2018-01-02T14:45:12Z

Escargon moved page Talk:Big Red to Talk:Big Red (G1) over redirect: See talk page

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:45, 2 January 2018
(No difference)

Escargon: /* G1 */

2018-01-02T14:44:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 2 January 2018
Line 20:		Line 20:

	So shouldn't the "(G1)" be removed from the title, since this is the only Big Red page? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 08:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)		So shouldn't the "(G1)" be removed from the title, since this is the only Big Red page? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 08:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)
			:The soda brand had a Transformers promotion for Age of Extinction, its just nobody made that page yet. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:44, 2 January 2018 (EST)

Saix: Saix moved page Talk:Big Red (G1) to Talk:Big Red

2018-01-02T13:14:51Z

Saix moved page Talk:Big Red (G1) to Talk:Big Red

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:14, 2 January 2018
(No difference)

Flicky1991: /* G1 */ new section

2018-01-02T13:13:22Z

G1: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 2 January 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:: I'm not seeing it. Big Red ''might'' have been based on some old robot toy, but not these two. The parts don't look anything like Big Red's. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 21:30, 18 January 2012 (EST)		:: I'm not seeing it. Big Red ''might'' have been based on some old robot toy, but not these two. The parts don't look anything like Big Red's. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 21:30, 18 January 2012 (EST)
	:::Yeah, I think it's really really stretching beyond the point of belief to say that Big Red looks like either of those two guys. The guy on the left has a square torso with a big shield shape on the front of it and a distorted star-shape. Big Red has a square torso with a triangular section cut out of the bottom and a sorta windscreeny slot. To claim they were similar, you'd have to strip the shapes down to the point where they could apply to virtually any big boxy robot. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 18 January 2012 (EST)		:::Yeah, I think it's really really stretching beyond the point of belief to say that Big Red looks like either of those two guys. The guy on the left has a square torso with a big shield shape on the front of it and a distorted star-shape. Big Red has a square torso with a triangular section cut out of the bottom and a sorta windscreeny slot. To claim they were similar, you'd have to strip the shapes down to the point where they could apply to virtually any big boxy robot. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 18 January 2012 (EST)

			== G1 ==

			So shouldn't the "(G1)" be removed from the title, since this is the only Big Red page? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 08:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)

StarWars Jedi: StarWars Jedi moved page Talk:Big Red to Talk:Big Red (G1): He appeared in Aligned Pop-Uo book

2014-12-30T10:59:04Z

StarWars Jedi moved page Talk:Big Red to Talk:Big Red (G1): He appeared in Aligned Pop-Uo book

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:59, 30 December 2014
(No difference)

Abates at 02:49, 19 January 2012

2012-01-19T02:49:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 19 January 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:: I'm not seeing it. Big Red ''might'' have been based on some old robot toy, but not these two. The parts don't look anything like Big Red's. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 21:30, 18 January 2012 (EST)		:: I'm not seeing it. Big Red ''might'' have been based on some old robot toy, but not these two. The parts don't look anything like Big Red's. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 21:30, 18 January 2012 (EST)
			:::Yeah, I think it's really really stretching beyond the point of belief to say that Big Red looks like either of those two guys. The guy on the left has a square torso with a big shield shape on the front of it and a distorted star-shape. Big Red has a square torso with a triangular section cut out of the bottom and a sorta windscreeny slot. To claim they were similar, you'd have to strip the shapes down to the point where they could apply to virtually any big boxy robot. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 18 January 2012 (EST)

Stevo at 02:30, 19 January 2012

2012-01-19T02:30:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 19 January 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:

	[[Image:[[http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/2898/bigredjapaneserobots.jpg]]		[[Image:[[http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/2898/bigredjapaneserobots.jpg]]

			:: I'm not seeing it. Big Red ''might'' have been based on some old robot toy, but not these two. The parts don't look anything like Big Red's. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 21:30, 18 January 2012 (EST)

Ginrai at 00:37, 19 January 2012

2012-01-19T00:37:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 19 January 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Hmm, perhaps Zambot 3? http://www.robot-japan.com/images/stories/Clover/Zambot_3_DX/Zanpopy.JPG.jpeg Same designer, IIRC. Not the knees and feet... still has the fin through the leg thing?--[[User:Ginrai\|Ginrai]] 21:48, 16 January 2012 (EST)		::Hmm, perhaps Zambot 3? http://www.robot-japan.com/images/stories/Clover/Zambot_3_DX/Zanpopy.JPG.jpeg Same designer, IIRC. Not the knees and feet... still has the fin through the leg thing?--[[User:Ginrai\|Ginrai]] 21:48, 16 January 2012 (EST)
	:::I'm not seeing any resemblance in any of these, beyond them generally being human-shaped robots and having some red on them. They have more in common with Star Convoy than Big Red. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:58, 16 January 2012 (EST)		:::I'm not seeing any resemblance in any of these, beyond them generally being human-shaped robots and having some red on them. They have more in common with Star Convoy than Big Red. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:58, 16 January 2012 (EST)

			Well, I am not talking about color but specifically shapes of the parts. I've attached a picture with some comparisons, but when I get home tonight I will try to remember to get out my Daitarn toy so I can show how the backpack with the missiles looks like Big Red's.[[User:Ginrai\|Ginrai]] 19:37, 18 January 2012 (EST)

			[[Image:[[http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/2898/bigredjapaneserobots.jpg]]

Abates at 02:58, 17 January 2012

2012-01-17T02:58:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 17 January 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I see similarities, but there are a LOT of things that are different. Chest, shoulders, forearms, knees...the main thing the comparison has going for it is the weird fin-things running down the shins and through the feet. More than anything, it makes me wonder if he's not drawn off some OTHER super robot. Springer might have sought out some other robot toys to supplement whatever he got from Hasbro. This COULD be based on Daitarn, but I'm personally not prepared to say it IS. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 21:05, 16 January 2012 (EST)		:I see similarities, but there are a LOT of things that are different. Chest, shoulders, forearms, knees...the main thing the comparison has going for it is the weird fin-things running down the shins and through the feet. More than anything, it makes me wonder if he's not drawn off some OTHER super robot. Springer might have sought out some other robot toys to supplement whatever he got from Hasbro. This COULD be based on Daitarn, but I'm personally not prepared to say it IS. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 21:05, 16 January 2012 (EST)

	Hmm, perhaps Zambot 3? http://www.robot-japan.com/images/stories/Clover/Zambot_3_DX/Zanpopy.JPG.jpeg Same designer, IIRC. Not the knees and feet... still has the fin through the leg thing?--[[User:Ginrai\|Ginrai]] 21:48, 16 January 2012 (EST)		::Hmm, perhaps Zambot 3? http://www.robot-japan.com/images/stories/Clover/Zambot_3_DX/Zanpopy.JPG.jpeg Same designer, IIRC. Not the knees and feet... still has the fin through the leg thing?--[[User:Ginrai\|Ginrai]] 21:48, 16 January 2012 (EST)
			:::I'm not seeing any resemblance in any of these, beyond them generally being human-shaped robots and having some red on them. They have more in common with Star Convoy than Big Red. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:58, 16 January 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 2 January 2018
Line 21:		Line 21:
	So shouldn't the "(G1)" be removed from the title, since this is the only Big Red page? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 08:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)		So shouldn't the "(G1)" be removed from the title, since this is the only Big Red page? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 08:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)
	:The soda brand had a Transformers promotion for Age of Extinction, its just nobody made that page yet. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:44, 2 January 2018 (EST)		:The soda brand had a Transformers promotion for Age of Extinction, its just nobody made that page yet. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:44, 2 January 2018 (EST)
			::Well if you're in the know, then might it be useful to stick a disambig up? I, for one, have no idea this existed. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 10:13, 2 January 2018 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 17 January 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I see similarities, but there are a LOT of things that are different. Chest, shoulders, forearms, knees...the main thing the comparison has going for it is the weird fin-things running down the shins and through the feet. More than anything, it makes me wonder if he's not drawn off some OTHER super robot. Springer might have sought out some other robot toys to supplement whatever he got from Hasbro. This COULD be based on Daitarn, but I'm personally not prepared to say it IS. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 21:05, 16 January 2012 (EST)		:I see similarities, but there are a LOT of things that are different. Chest, shoulders, forearms, knees...the main thing the comparison has going for it is the weird fin-things running down the shins and through the feet. More than anything, it makes me wonder if he's not drawn off some OTHER super robot. Springer might have sought out some other robot toys to supplement whatever he got from Hasbro. This COULD be based on Daitarn, but I'm personally not prepared to say it IS. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 21:05, 16 January 2012 (EST)

	Hmm, perhaps Zambot 3? http://www.robot-japan.com/images/stories/Clover/Zambot_3_DX/Zanpopy.JPG.jpeg Same designer, IIRC. Not the knees and feet... still has the fin through the leg thing?--[[User:Ginrai\|Ginrai]] 21:48, 16 January 2012 (EST)		::Hmm, perhaps Zambot 3? http://www.robot-japan.com/images/stories/Clover/Zambot_3_DX/Zanpopy.JPG.jpeg Same designer, IIRC. Not the knees and feet... still has the fin through the leg thing?--[[User:Ginrai\|Ginrai]] 21:48, 16 January 2012 (EST)
			:::I'm not seeing any resemblance in any of these, beyond them generally being human-shaped robots and having some red on them. They have more in common with Star Convoy than Big Red. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:58, 16 January 2012 (EST)