Talk:Bludgeon (Animated) - Revision history

Primestar3 at 18:21, 2 December 2017

2017-12-02T18:21:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 2 December 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	:::::BTW, not that it's ~~revelant~~ but I didn't write the joke in the description of this page, I copy pasted it from an earlier deleted version of this page, just saying.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2017 (EST)		:::::BTW, not that it's relevant but I didn't write the joke in the description of this page, I copy pasted it from an earlier deleted version of this page, just saying.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2017 (EST)

Primestar3 at 13:55, 2 December 2017

2017-12-02T13:55:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 2 December 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			:::::BTW, not that it's revelant but I didn't write the joke in the description of this page, I copy pasted it from an earlier deleted version of this page, just saying.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2017 (EST)

Saix at 00:28, 22 July 2017

2017-07-22T00:28:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 22 July 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

Chris McFeely at 23:10, 21 July 2017

2017-07-21T23:10:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 21 July 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, mentioned in another out-of-universe media, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, mentioned in another out-of-universe media, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

Primestar3 at 22:38, 21 July 2017

2017-07-21T22:38:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 21 July 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I dunno, that red link was driving me nuts.		:I dunno, that red link was driving me nuts.

	:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, mentioned in another out-of-universe media, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

Saix at 22:07, 21 July 2017

2017-07-21T22:07:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 21 July 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

Primestar3 at 22:01, 21 July 2017

2017-07-21T22:01:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 21 July 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I dunno, that red link was driving me nuts.		:I dunno, that red link was driving me nuts.

	:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[~~Disapperium~~]], a joke, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

Primestar3 at 22:00, 21 July 2017

2017-07-21T22:00:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 21 July 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should this page exist? --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 17:50, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		Should this page exist? --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 17:50, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			:I dunno, that red link was driving me nuts.

			:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disapperium]], a joke, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

Jimsorenson: Created page with "Should this page exist? --~~~~"

2017-07-21T21:50:49Z

Created page with "Should this page exist? --~~~~"

New page

Should this page exist? --[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson|talk]]) 17:50, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 2 December 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	:::::BTW, not that it's ~~revelant~~ but I didn't write the joke in the description of this page, I copy pasted it from an earlier deleted version of this page, just saying.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2017 (EST)		:::::BTW, not that it's relevant but I didn't write the joke in the description of this page, I copy pasted it from an earlier deleted version of this page, just saying.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2017 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 2 December 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			:::::BTW, not that it's revelant but I didn't write the joke in the description of this page, I copy pasted it from an earlier deleted version of this page, just saying.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2017 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 22 July 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			::::Yeah, I think the line is whether it appeared in official material or was created to be part of the fiction or toyline. Bludgeon fits both criteria. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 21 July 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, mentioned in another out-of-universe media, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		:[[Anibots]] articles existed long before you added them to AVP and since this concept art was published in an offical book, I'd say so. (There's even an article for [[Disappearium]], a joke, mentioned in another out-of-universe media, so why not Bludgeon?)--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
	::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)		::We have plenty of articles on proposed characters (Anibots, Mayumi, Albitron), so I think this is more than fine. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 18:07, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
			:::Yeah, I don't think there's a problem in having this particular article, as we do chronicled proposed behind-the-scenes stuff like this - but we must also be wary of the fact that Wyatt has created a ''shitton'' of designs for ''Animated''-ized versions of characters, which don't automatically qualify as stuff worth wiki-ing. Bludgeon's inclusion in the Almanac seems grounds enough for him to be here, but we can't let this be a slippery slope justification to start adding articles for DJW's convention commission "OCs." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 19:10, 21 July 2017 (EDT)