Talk:Body-type - Revision history

Jalaguy: /* Sideswipe */

2013-02-10T16:38:31Z

Sideswipe

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 10 February 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	On the basis that there's a four-character body-type here, I assume the original Sideswipe is eligible, since five characters share the type. What should the type be called? Just "Sideswipe-type" or something like that? --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 05:09, 10 February 2013 (EST)		On the basis that there's a four-character body-type here, I assume the original Sideswipe is eligible, since five characters share the type. What should the type be called? Just "Sideswipe-type" or something like that? --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 05:09, 10 February 2013 (EST)
	:That's not really relevant to fiction, since sharing the same toy was not something that got mentioned in any way, as far as I know. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:35, 10 February 2013 (EST)		:That's not really relevant to fiction, since sharing the same toy was not something that got mentioned in any way, as far as I know. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:35, 10 February 2013 (EST)
			::Yeah, I think the Seekers' presence here is 'cause them all having the same body is a fictionally relevant thing. If we listed every single instance of 4+ characters having the same mould, well... This page would be significantly longer... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 11:38, 10 February 2013 (EST)

Starfield: /* Sideswipe */

2013-02-10T16:35:10Z

Sideswipe

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 10 February 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:

	On the basis that there's a four-character body-type here, I assume the original Sideswipe is eligible, since five characters share the type. What should the type be called? Just "Sideswipe-type" or something like that? --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 05:09, 10 February 2013 (EST)		On the basis that there's a four-character body-type here, I assume the original Sideswipe is eligible, since five characters share the type. What should the type be called? Just "Sideswipe-type" or something like that? --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 05:09, 10 February 2013 (EST)
			:That's not really relevant to fiction, since sharing the same toy was not something that got mentioned in any way, as far as I know. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:35, 10 February 2013 (EST)

Flicky1991: /* Sideswipe */ new section

2013-02-10T10:09:50Z

Sideswipe: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:09, 10 February 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Animated==		==Animated==
	It seems to me that the Animated section is becoming overblown. We're doing exactly what we agree above not to do, listing a ton of Animated characters who share body types. (Oh, and Optimus and his clones, once again, seems like a different phenomena.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 21:20, 30 July 2011 (EDT)		It seems to me that the Animated section is becoming overblown. We're doing exactly what we agree above not to do, listing a ton of Animated characters who share body types. (Oh, and Optimus and his clones, once again, seems like a different phenomena.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 21:20, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

			== Sideswipe ==

			On the basis that there's a four-character body-type here, I assume the original Sideswipe is eligible, since five characters share the type. What should the type be called? Just "Sideswipe-type" or something like that? --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 05:09, 10 February 2013 (EST)

Jimsorenson at 01:20, 31 July 2011

2011-07-31T01:20:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 31 July 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:

	In the similar way we should consider Starscream clones are body-type. Because while they are clones, they are developing their own personalities, and Sunstorm and Ramjet have now their distinctive heads. But still they are clones... but Spittor and another guy have the same body type, and in some way Huffer and Pipes.--[[Special:Contributions/194.228.147.9\|194.228.147.9]] 15:12, 7 March 2011 (EST)		In the similar way we should consider Starscream clones are body-type. Because while they are clones, they are developing their own personalities, and Sunstorm and Ramjet have now their distinctive heads. But still they are clones... but Spittor and another guy have the same body type, and in some way Huffer and Pipes.--[[Special:Contributions/194.228.147.9\|194.228.147.9]] 15:12, 7 March 2011 (EST)

			==Animated==
			It seems to me that the Animated section is becoming overblown. We're doing exactly what we agree above not to do, listing a ton of Animated characters who share body types. (Oh, and Optimus and his clones, once again, seems like a different phenomena.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 21:20, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

194.228.147.9 at 20:12, 7 March 2011

2011-03-07T20:12:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 7 March 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)		Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)
	: Okay, I've pared it down considerably. Dude, if we started listing every guy who shared another body with another guy, WE'D BE LISTING THE ENTIRE WIKI. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:29, 8 November 2009 (EST)		: Okay, I've pared it down considerably. Dude, if we started listing every guy who shared another body with another guy, WE'D BE LISTING THE ENTIRE WIKI. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:29, 8 November 2009 (EST)

			In the similar way we should consider Starscream clones are body-type. Because while they are clones, they are developing their own personalities, and Sunstorm and Ramjet have now their distinctive heads. But still they are clones... but Spittor and another guy have the same body type, and in some way Huffer and Pipes.--[[Special:Contributions/194.228.147.9\|194.228.147.9]] 15:12, 7 March 2011 (EST)

Deceptitran: BOT: replacing (1) links to "Drones" with "Drone"

2009-11-21T11:32:46Z

BOT: replacing (1) links to "Drones" with "Drone"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 21 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do [[drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT)		Do [[Drone\|drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT)
	:Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101\|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT)		:Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101\|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 06:29, 8 November 2009

2009-11-08T06:29:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 8 November 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)		Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)
			: Okay, I've pared it down considerably. Dude, if we started listing every guy who shared another body with another guy, WE'D BE LISTING THE ENTIRE WIKI. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:29, 8 November 2009 (EST)

ItsWalky at 03:47, 8 November 2009

2009-11-08T03:47:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 8 November 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:OK, Anonymous and Starfield agree with me ... anyone else? If no one feel strongly about it, I'm gonna torch the drone section of the movie 'body types', since in my view hordes of drones is an entirely different phenomena. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:04, 7 November 2009 (EST)		:OK, Anonymous and Starfield agree with me ... anyone else? If no one feel strongly about it, I'm gonna torch the drone section of the movie 'body types', since in my view hordes of drones is an entirely different phenomena. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:04, 7 November 2009 (EST)

	Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/67.149.197.71~~\|~~67.149.197.71~~]] 22:46, 7 November 2009 (EST)		Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)

67.149.197.71 at 03:46, 8 November 2009

2009-11-08T03:46:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 8 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:OK, Anonymous and Starfield agree with me ... anyone else? If no one feel strongly about it, I'm gonna torch the drone section of the movie 'body types', since in my view hordes of drones is an entirely different phenomena. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:04, 7 November 2009 (EST)		:OK, Anonymous and Starfield agree with me ... anyone else? If no one feel strongly about it, I'm gonna torch the drone section of the movie 'body types', since in my view hordes of drones is an entirely different phenomena. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:04, 7 November 2009 (EST)

			Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[Special:Contributions/67.149.197.71\|67.149.197.71]] 22:46, 7 November 2009 (EST)

Jimsorenson at 03:04, 8 November 2009

2009-11-08T03:04:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:04, 8 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do [[drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT)		Do [[drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT)
	:Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101\|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT)		:Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101\|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT)


	1) The ROTF bike chicks are actually quite different. 2) I agree drones shouldn't be included. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 21:20, 7 November 2009 (EST)		1) The ROTF bike chicks are actually quite different. 2) I agree drones shouldn't be included. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 21:20, 7 November 2009 (EST)

			:OK, Anonymous and Starfield agree with me ... anyone else? If no one feel strongly about it, I'm gonna torch the drone section of the movie 'body types', since in my view hordes of drones is an entirely different phenomena. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:04, 7 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 10 February 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	On the basis that there's a four-character body-type here, I assume the original Sideswipe is eligible, since five characters share the type. What should the type be called? Just "Sideswipe-type" or something like that? --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 05:09, 10 February 2013 (EST)		On the basis that there's a four-character body-type here, I assume the original Sideswipe is eligible, since five characters share the type. What should the type be called? Just "Sideswipe-type" or something like that? --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 05:09, 10 February 2013 (EST)
	:That's not really relevant to fiction, since sharing the same toy was not something that got mentioned in any way, as far as I know. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:35, 10 February 2013 (EST)		:That's not really relevant to fiction, since sharing the same toy was not something that got mentioned in any way, as far as I know. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:35, 10 February 2013 (EST)
			::Yeah, I think the Seekers' presence here is 'cause them all having the same body is a fictionally relevant thing. If we listed every single instance of 4+ characters having the same mould, well... This page would be significantly longer... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 11:38, 10 February 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 7 March 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)		Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)
	: Okay, I've pared it down considerably. Dude, if we started listing every guy who shared another body with another guy, WE'D BE LISTING THE ENTIRE WIKI. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:29, 8 November 2009 (EST)		: Okay, I've pared it down considerably. Dude, if we started listing every guy who shared another body with another guy, WE'D BE LISTING THE ENTIRE WIKI. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:29, 8 November 2009 (EST)

			In the similar way we should consider Starscream clones are body-type. Because while they are clones, they are developing their own personalities, and Sunstorm and Ramjet have now their distinctive heads. But still they are clones... but Spittor and another guy have the same body type, and in some way Huffer and Pipes.--[[Special:Contributions/194.228.147.9\|194.228.147.9]] 15:12, 7 March 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:04, 8 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do [[drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT)		Do [[drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT)
	:Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101\|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT)		:Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101\|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT)


	1) The ROTF bike chicks are actually quite different. 2) I agree drones shouldn't be included. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 21:20, 7 November 2009 (EST)		1) The ROTF bike chicks are actually quite different. 2) I agree drones shouldn't be included. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 21:20, 7 November 2009 (EST)

			:OK, Anonymous and Starfield agree with me ... anyone else? If no one feel strongly about it, I'm gonna torch the drone section of the movie 'body types', since in my view hordes of drones is an entirely different phenomena. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:04, 7 November 2009 (EST)