Talk:BotCon 2004 - Revision history

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 at 22:47, 31 December 2021

2021-12-31T22:47:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 31 December 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)		:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)
	::BC04 was worth listing as an exception, when it fell during the recognized lifespan of official cons, and was run by the respected old team before a lot of the bad blood got stirred up, and had an unprecedentedly high-quality unofficial exclusive. Part of me still feels like it should be included, but if the only way to do that is to arbitrarily declare we like '04 more than '22, then we may have no choice but to delete the page and recategorize the info as Abates suggested. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:42, 31 December 2021 (EST)		::BC04 was worth listing as an exception, when it fell during the recognized lifespan of official cons, and was run by the respected old team before a lot of the bad blood got stirred up, and had an unprecedentedly high-quality unofficial exclusive. Part of me still feels like it should be included, but if the only way to do that is to arbitrarily declare we like '04 more than '22, then we may have no choice but to delete the page and recategorize the info as Abates suggested. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:42, 31 December 2021 (EST)
			:::I feel like the BotCon 2004 page provides some context on the schism in the latter 3H years in contrast to how diversified fan conventions have become in the post-Fun Publications years. For that much, I am inclined to make an exception because this page has endured so long. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:47, 31 December 2021 (EST)

Thylacine 2000: /* Need for page */

2021-12-31T22:42:33Z

Need for page

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 31 December 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Is there any point to keeping this around? This page isn't really illustrative of anything official and we're past the point where this is the only unofficial convention with the BotCon name. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:33, 10 May 2021 (EDT)		Is there any point to keeping this around? This page isn't really illustrative of anything official and we're past the point where this is the only unofficial convention with the BotCon name. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:33, 10 May 2021 (EDT)
	:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)		:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)
			::BC04 was worth listing as an exception, when it fell during the recognized lifespan of official cons, and was run by the respected old team before a lot of the bad blood got stirred up, and had an unprecedentedly high-quality unofficial exclusive. Part of me still feels like it should be included, but if the only way to do that is to arbitrarily declare we like '04 more than '22, then we may have no choice but to delete the page and recategorize the info as Abates suggested. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:42, 31 December 2021 (EST)

Abates at 22:23, 31 December 2021

2021-12-31T22:23:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 31 December 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Is there any point to keeping this around? This page isn't really illustrative of anything official and we're past the point where this is the only unofficial convention with the BotCon name. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:33, 10 May 2021 (EDT)		Is there any point to keeping this around? This page isn't really illustrative of anything official and we're past the point where this is the only unofficial convention with the BotCon name. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:33, 10 May 2021 (EDT)
			:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)

Saix: /* Need for page */ new section

2021-05-11T02:33:19Z

Need for page: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 11 May 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Just to clarify, these people were former whatevers at the time? This isn't some misguided attempt to "correct" things after the fact? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:47, 6 February 2020 (EST)		Just to clarify, these people were former whatevers at the time? This isn't some misguided attempt to "correct" things after the fact? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:47, 6 February 2020 (EST)

			== Need for page ==

			Is there any point to keeping this around? This page isn't really illustrative of anything official and we're past the point where this is the only unofficial convention with the BotCon name. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:33, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Hasbro personnel */ new section

2020-02-06T12:47:33Z

Hasbro personnel: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 6 February 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:
	----		----
	This probably isn't worth adding a "Trivia" section to the article for, but according to TFW2005's podcast (in a discussion of TFcon), they mentioned that none other than [[Derrick J. Wyatt]] was at BotCon 2004, before he ever did work on TFA. Very interesting to know! - [[User:Malunis T\|Malunis T]] 07:44, 3 August 2009 (EDT)		This probably isn't worth adding a "Trivia" section to the article for, but according to TFW2005's podcast (in a discussion of TFcon), they mentioned that none other than [[Derrick J. Wyatt]] was at BotCon 2004, before he ever did work on TFA. Very interesting to know! - [[User:Malunis T\|Malunis T]] 07:44, 3 August 2009 (EDT)

			== Hasbro personnel ==

			Just to clarify, these people were former whatevers at the time? This isn't some misguided attempt to "correct" things after the fact? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:47, 6 February 2020 (EST)

Malunis T at 11:44, 3 August 2009

2009-08-03T11:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 3 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Were BotCons "officially sanctioned by Hasbro" in the beginning?--[[User:G.B. Blackrock\|G.B. Blackrock]] 04:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)		Were BotCons "officially sanctioned by Hasbro" in the beginning?--[[User:G.B. Blackrock\|G.B. Blackrock]] 04:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
			----
			This probably isn't worth adding a "Trivia" section to the article for, but according to TFW2005's podcast (in a discussion of TFcon), they mentioned that none other than [[Derrick J. Wyatt]] was at BotCon 2004, before he ever did work on TFA. Very interesting to know! - [[User:Malunis T\|Malunis T]] 07:44, 3 August 2009 (EDT)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-27T09:51:58Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:51, 27 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Were BotCons "officially sanctioned by Hasbro" in the beginning?--[[User:G.B. Blackrock\|G.B. Blackrock]] 04:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		Were BotCons "officially sanctioned by Hasbro" in the beginning?--[[User:G.B. Blackrock\|G.B. Blackrock]] 04:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

G.B. Blackrock: officially sanctioned?

2008-01-13T04:17:50Z

officially sanctioned?

New page

Were BotCons "officially sanctioned by Hasbro" in the beginning?--[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] 04:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 31 December 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)		:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)
	::BC04 was worth listing as an exception, when it fell during the recognized lifespan of official cons, and was run by the respected old team before a lot of the bad blood got stirred up, and had an unprecedentedly high-quality unofficial exclusive. Part of me still feels like it should be included, but if the only way to do that is to arbitrarily declare we like '04 more than '22, then we may have no choice but to delete the page and recategorize the info as Abates suggested. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:42, 31 December 2021 (EST)		::BC04 was worth listing as an exception, when it fell during the recognized lifespan of official cons, and was run by the respected old team before a lot of the bad blood got stirred up, and had an unprecedentedly high-quality unofficial exclusive. Part of me still feels like it should be included, but if the only way to do that is to arbitrarily declare we like '04 more than '22, then we may have no choice but to delete the page and recategorize the info as Abates suggested. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:42, 31 December 2021 (EST)
			:::I feel like the BotCon 2004 page provides some context on the schism in the latter 3H years in contrast to how diversified fan conventions have become in the post-Fun Publications years. For that much, I am inclined to make an exception because this page has endured so long. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:47, 31 December 2021 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 31 December 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Is there any point to keeping this around? This page isn't really illustrative of anything official and we're past the point where this is the only unofficial convention with the BotCon name. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:33, 10 May 2021 (EDT)		Is there any point to keeping this around? This page isn't really illustrative of anything official and we're past the point where this is the only unofficial convention with the BotCon name. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:33, 10 May 2021 (EDT)
	:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)		:Seems like mostly the only reason to keep this would be as part of detailing BotCon history, but that could probably be better done in notes on the [[BotCon]] page. I'd like there to be more input from people before we go ahead and delete it though. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2021 (EST)
			::BC04 was worth listing as an exception, when it fell during the recognized lifespan of official cons, and was run by the respected old team before a lot of the bad blood got stirred up, and had an unprecedentedly high-quality unofficial exclusive. Part of me still feels like it should be included, but if the only way to do that is to arbitrarily declare we like '04 more than '22, then we may have no choice but to delete the page and recategorize the info as Abates suggested. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:42, 31 December 2021 (EST)