Talk:BotCon 2010 - Generation 2: Redux - Revision history

Interrobang: Talk:BotCon 2010! moved to Talk:BotCon 2010 - Generation 2: Redux: Title on YouTube page

2010-10-11T05:51:33Z

Talk:BotCon 2010! moved to Talk:BotCon 2010 - Generation 2: Redux: Title on YouTube page

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:51, 11 October 2010
(No difference)

Interrobang: /* Title */ new section

2010-10-11T05:43:13Z

Title: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 11 October 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:I did that yesterday. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:40, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		:I did that yesterday. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:40, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
	::That's because you are both a gentleman and a scholar, and I was looking at an older version of the page somehow. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 23:13, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		::That's because you are both a gentleman and a scholar, and I was looking at an older version of the page somehow. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 23:13, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

			== Title ==

			Where does it come from? I ask because the YouTube video title is "BotCon 2010 - Generation 2: Redux". [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:43, 11 October 2010 (EDT)

Jimsorenson at 03:13, 6 June 2010

2010-06-06T03:13:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 6 June 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
	:I did that yesterday. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:40, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		:I did that yesterday. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:40, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
			::That's because you are both a gentleman and a scholar, and I was looking at an older version of the page somehow. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 23:13, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

Abates: /* Edit war */

2010-06-06T02:40:03Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 6 June 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
			:I did that yesterday. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:40, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

Jimsorenson: /* Edit war */

2010-06-06T02:35:57Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 6 June 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::::::::If that were the case, I'd have removed it last night. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 02:10, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::::::If that were the case, I'd have removed it last night. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 02:10, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

			You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

Abates at 06:10, 5 June 2010

2010-06-05T06:10:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 5 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::::::::::If that were the case, I'd have removed it last night. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 02:10, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

Semysane: /* Edit war */

2010-06-05T03:50:11Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 5 June 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)

Lonegamer78: /* Edit war */

2010-06-05T02:52:21Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 5 June 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::::::::Yeah, it was done by a professional animation company for television screening and is largely derided by fans for its poor quality. This is a small budget promo done by one or two guys, probably in their spare time, to be put up on YouTube to promote a con. Nitpicking its quality just seems like poor sport to me. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::Yeah, it was done by a professional animation company for television screening and is largely derided by fans for its poor quality. This is a small budget promo done by one or two guys, probably in their spare time, to be put up on YouTube to promote a con. Nitpicking its quality just seems like poor sport to me. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)

NCZ: /* Edit war */

2010-06-05T01:53:42Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 5 June 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::::::::But Energon was an official, big-budget Hasbro cartoon, not a (presumably) small-budget promo. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:34, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::But Energon was an official, big-budget Hasbro cartoon, not a (presumably) small-budget promo. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:34, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::::Yeah, it was done by a professional animation company for television screening and is largely derided by fans for its poor quality. This is a small budget promo done by one or two guys, probably in their spare time, to be put up on YouTube to promote a con. Nitpicking its quality just seems like poor sport to me. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::Yeah, it was done by a professional animation company for television screening and is largely derided by fans for its poor quality. This is a small budget promo done by one or two guys, probably in their spare time, to be put up on YouTube to promote a con. Nitpicking its quality just seems like poor sport to me. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)

Abates at 01:49, 5 June 2010

2010-06-05T01:49:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 5 June 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::::::If Energon gets a big section dedicated to how bad the animation is, I don't see why this should get a free pass for just a small note about it. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 19:48, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::If Energon gets a big section dedicated to how bad the animation is, I don't see why this should get a free pass for just a small note about it. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 19:48, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::::But Energon was an official, big-budget Hasbro cartoon, not a (presumably) small-budget promo. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:34, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::But Energon was an official, big-budget Hasbro cartoon, not a (presumably) small-budget promo. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:34, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::::::Yeah, it was done by a professional animation company for television screening and is largely derided by fans for its poor quality. This is a small budget promo done by one or two guys, probably in their spare time, to be put up on YouTube to promote a con. Nitpicking its quality just seems like poor sport to me. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 4 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 6 June 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
	:I did that yesterday. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:40, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		:I did that yesterday. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:40, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
			::That's because you are both a gentleman and a scholar, and I was looking at an older version of the page somehow. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 23:13, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 6 June 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::::::::If that were the case, I'd have removed it last night. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 02:10, 5 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::::::If that were the case, I'd have removed it last night. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 02:10, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

			You know what, the voting is pretty clear to remove it. Let's unlock the page and get rid of it once and for all. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 22:35, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 5 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::::::::::If that were the case, I'd have removed it last night. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 02:10, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 5 June 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::::::::::::Personally I think we should have the note. I really don't see why they get a pass just because the guy who made it had a hissy on this wiki. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 23:50, 4 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 5 June 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::::::::Yeah, it was done by a professional animation company for television screening and is largely derided by fans for its poor quality. This is a small budget promo done by one or two guys, probably in their spare time, to be put up on YouTube to promote a con. Nitpicking its quality just seems like poor sport to me. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::::Yeah, it was done by a professional animation company for television screening and is largely derided by fans for its poor quality. This is a small budget promo done by one or two guys, probably in their spare time, to be put up on YouTube to promote a con. Nitpicking its quality just seems like poor sport to me. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:49, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::::::::So "nix it" is the verdict? (Two votes to stay, four to kill it.) --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 21:53, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::::::::Make that vote five to nix it. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:52, 4 June 2010 (EDT)