Talk:Bulkhead (G1) - Revision history

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 at 10:30, 25 November 2025

2025-11-25T10:30:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 25 November 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	So Skybound has announced second printing covers for ''Transformers'' #25 [https://www.instagram.com/p/DPzqpx-kdMJ/?img_index=1] [https://x.com/Skybound/status/1978234000020795614] [https://www.facebook.com/SkyboundEntertainment/posts/pfbid02ScgppvaohQb4aouQqTUdAH9y4gBaNRFvyAigaTWbKPWSXFYkxZmwtbw3vZcKJ8MZl] including one of Skybound Bulkhead's character model on a mostly-plain white background. When an isolated view arrives, do we want to switch the main image to the Skybound design, or keep the existing ''Prime''-cum-IDW comic screencap? For comparison, "[[Knock Out (G1)\|Knock Out]]" remains with a ''Prime''-cum-IDW concept model as the main image. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:46, 16 October 2025 (EDT)		So Skybound has announced second printing covers for ''Transformers'' #25 [https://www.instagram.com/p/DPzqpx-kdMJ/?img_index=1] [https://x.com/Skybound/status/1978234000020795614] [https://www.facebook.com/SkyboundEntertainment/posts/pfbid02ScgppvaohQb4aouQqTUdAH9y4gBaNRFvyAigaTWbKPWSXFYkxZmwtbw3vZcKJ8MZl] including one of Skybound Bulkhead's character model on a mostly-plain white background. When an isolated view arrives, do we want to switch the main image to the Skybound design, or keep the existing ''Prime''-cum-IDW comic screencap? For comparison, "[[Knock Out (G1)\|Knock Out]]" remains with a ''Prime''-cum-IDW concept model as the main image. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:46, 16 October 2025 (EDT)
	:I think we should absolutely get a new main image for him other than "alternate universe cameo". Maybe we should wait though to see if there's anything in the next Skybound issue when he revives that looks cooler, but can't go wrong with character model image usually. [[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:16, 16 October 2025 (EDT)		:I think we should absolutely get a new main image for him other than "alternate universe cameo". Maybe we should wait though to see if there's anything in the next Skybound issue when he revives that looks cooler, but can't go wrong with character model image usually. [[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:16, 16 October 2025 (EDT)
			::Well, no one else has commented in over a month, so I am trialing it out now! [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 05:30, 25 November 2025 (EST)

Nu-Priest: /* Main image */

2025-10-16T17:16:40Z

Main image

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 16 October 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:

	So Skybound has announced second printing covers for ''Transformers'' #25 [https://www.instagram.com/p/DPzqpx-kdMJ/?img_index=1] [https://x.com/Skybound/status/1978234000020795614] [https://www.facebook.com/SkyboundEntertainment/posts/pfbid02ScgppvaohQb4aouQqTUdAH9y4gBaNRFvyAigaTWbKPWSXFYkxZmwtbw3vZcKJ8MZl] including one of Skybound Bulkhead's character model on a mostly-plain white background. When an isolated view arrives, do we want to switch the main image to the Skybound design, or keep the existing ''Prime''-cum-IDW comic screencap? For comparison, "[[Knock Out (G1)\|Knock Out]]" remains with a ''Prime''-cum-IDW concept model as the main image. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:46, 16 October 2025 (EDT)		So Skybound has announced second printing covers for ''Transformers'' #25 [https://www.instagram.com/p/DPzqpx-kdMJ/?img_index=1] [https://x.com/Skybound/status/1978234000020795614] [https://www.facebook.com/SkyboundEntertainment/posts/pfbid02ScgppvaohQb4aouQqTUdAH9y4gBaNRFvyAigaTWbKPWSXFYkxZmwtbw3vZcKJ8MZl] including one of Skybound Bulkhead's character model on a mostly-plain white background. When an isolated view arrives, do we want to switch the main image to the Skybound design, or keep the existing ''Prime''-cum-IDW comic screencap? For comparison, "[[Knock Out (G1)\|Knock Out]]" remains with a ''Prime''-cum-IDW concept model as the main image. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:46, 16 October 2025 (EDT)
			:I think we should absolutely get a new main image for him other than "alternate universe cameo". Maybe we should wait though to see if there's anything in the next Skybound issue when he revives that looks cooler, but can't go wrong with character model image usually. [[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:16, 16 October 2025 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: /* Main image */ new section

2025-10-16T16:46:33Z

Main image: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 16 October 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)		:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	::::::If he's DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead, then he's DOTM. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:43, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::::::If he's DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead, then he's DOTM. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:43, 6 March 2013 (EST)

			== Main image ==

			So Skybound has announced second printing covers for ''Transformers'' #25 [https://www.instagram.com/p/DPzqpx-kdMJ/?img_index=1] [https://x.com/Skybound/status/1978234000020795614] [https://www.facebook.com/SkyboundEntertainment/posts/pfbid02ScgppvaohQb4aouQqTUdAH9y4gBaNRFvyAigaTWbKPWSXFYkxZmwtbw3vZcKJ8MZl] including one of Skybound Bulkhead's character model on a mostly-plain white background. When an isolated view arrives, do we want to switch the main image to the Skybound design, or keep the existing ''Prime''-cum-IDW comic screencap? For comparison, "[[Knock Out (G1)\|Knock Out]]" remains with a ''Prime''-cum-IDW concept model as the main image. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:46, 16 October 2025 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* Toys? */

2013-03-07T03:43:46Z

Toys?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 7 March 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)		:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			::::::If he's DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead, then he's DOTM. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:43, 6 March 2013 (EST)

Detour: /* Toys? */

2013-03-07T02:35:22Z

Toys?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 7 March 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)		:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Toys? */

2013-03-07T02:29:42Z

Toys?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 7 March 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)		:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)

Chris McFeely: /* Toys? */

2013-03-06T23:28:03Z

Toys?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 6 March 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I'd say yes. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:12, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::I'd say yes. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:12, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)

Jalaguy: /* Toys? */

2013-03-06T22:07:02Z

Toys?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 6 March 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Yeah, I came here to ask the same question. I kind of think every toy that is directly based on that design should be here. Kind of. It's not like a toy's being repurposed, it's a show model, which makes it weirder than usual. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:55, 6 March 2013 (EST)		: Yeah, I came here to ask the same question. I kind of think every toy that is directly based on that design should be here. Kind of. It's not like a toy's being repurposed, it's a show model, which makes it weirder than usual. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:55, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	::I'd say yes. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:12, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::I'd say yes. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:12, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)

Khajidha at 21:12, 6 March 2013

2013-03-06T21:12:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 6 March 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Okay, so: do we put all of TFP Bulkhead's toys that are based on his show model on here as repurposes? 'Cause none of them are ''perfect'' matches, but then neither are the WFC/FOC toys for the HMS character models, and we've still put those on G1 pages due to RID... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 05:40, 2 March 2013 (EST)		Okay, so: do we put all of TFP Bulkhead's toys that are based on his show model on here as repurposes? 'Cause none of them are ''perfect'' matches, but then neither are the WFC/FOC toys for the HMS character models, and we've still put those on G1 pages due to RID... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 05:40, 2 March 2013 (EST)
	: Yeah, I came here to ask the same question. I kind of think every toy that is directly based on that design should be here. Kind of. It's not like a toy's being repurposed, it's a show model, which makes it weirder than usual. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:55, 6 March 2013 (EST)		: Yeah, I came here to ask the same question. I kind of think every toy that is directly based on that design should be here. Kind of. It's not like a toy's being repurposed, it's a show model, which makes it weirder than usual. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:55, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			::I'd say yes. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:12, 6 March 2013 (EST)

ItsWalky at 20:55, 6 March 2013

2013-03-06T20:55:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 6 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Toys?==		==Toys?==
	Okay, so: do we put all of TFP Bulkhead's toys that are based on his show model on here as repurposes? 'Cause none of them are ''perfect'' matches, but then neither are the WFC/FOC toys for the HMS character models, and we've still put those on G1 pages due to RID... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 05:40, 2 March 2013 (EST)		Okay, so: do we put all of TFP Bulkhead's toys that are based on his show model on here as repurposes? 'Cause none of them are ''perfect'' matches, but then neither are the WFC/FOC toys for the HMS character models, and we've still put those on G1 pages due to RID... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 05:40, 2 March 2013 (EST)
			: Yeah, I came here to ask the same question. I kind of think every toy that is directly based on that design should be here. Kind of. It's not like a toy's being repurposed, it's a show model, which makes it weirder than usual. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:55, 6 March 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 25 November 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	So Skybound has announced second printing covers for ''Transformers'' #25 [https://www.instagram.com/p/DPzqpx-kdMJ/?img_index=1] [https://x.com/Skybound/status/1978234000020795614] [https://www.facebook.com/SkyboundEntertainment/posts/pfbid02ScgppvaohQb4aouQqTUdAH9y4gBaNRFvyAigaTWbKPWSXFYkxZmwtbw3vZcKJ8MZl] including one of Skybound Bulkhead's character model on a mostly-plain white background. When an isolated view arrives, do we want to switch the main image to the Skybound design, or keep the existing ''Prime''-cum-IDW comic screencap? For comparison, "[[Knock Out (G1)\|Knock Out]]" remains with a ''Prime''-cum-IDW concept model as the main image. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:46, 16 October 2025 (EDT)		So Skybound has announced second printing covers for ''Transformers'' #25 [https://www.instagram.com/p/DPzqpx-kdMJ/?img_index=1] [https://x.com/Skybound/status/1978234000020795614] [https://www.facebook.com/SkyboundEntertainment/posts/pfbid02ScgppvaohQb4aouQqTUdAH9y4gBaNRFvyAigaTWbKPWSXFYkxZmwtbw3vZcKJ8MZl] including one of Skybound Bulkhead's character model on a mostly-plain white background. When an isolated view arrives, do we want to switch the main image to the Skybound design, or keep the existing ''Prime''-cum-IDW comic screencap? For comparison, "[[Knock Out (G1)\|Knock Out]]" remains with a ''Prime''-cum-IDW concept model as the main image. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:46, 16 October 2025 (EDT)
	:I think we should absolutely get a new main image for him other than "alternate universe cameo". Maybe we should wait though to see if there's anything in the next Skybound issue when he revives that looks cooler, but can't go wrong with character model image usually. [[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:16, 16 October 2025 (EDT)		:I think we should absolutely get a new main image for him other than "alternate universe cameo". Maybe we should wait though to see if there's anything in the next Skybound issue when he revives that looks cooler, but can't go wrong with character model image usually. [[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 13:16, 16 October 2025 (EDT)
			::Well, no one else has commented in over a month, so I am trialing it out now! [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 05:30, 25 November 2025 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 7 March 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)		:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			::::::If he's DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead, then he's DOTM. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:43, 6 March 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 7 March 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)		:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			:::::On a similar note, should DOTM Speed Stars Bulkhead be listed as a repurposed toy for Prime Bulkhead? And this Bulkhead? Or is that stretching it? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 21:35, 6 March 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 7 March 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)		:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			::::Ding ding ding. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:29, 6 March 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 6 March 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I'd say yes. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:12, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::I'd say yes. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:12, 6 March 2013 (EST)
	::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)		::Well, it's basically the same case as the High Moon designs in RID. The comic uses the in-game designs, cheated transformations and all, rather than the the appearance of the toys derived from those designs. I guess it'd be the FE, RID and Cyberverse figures going on, then? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:07, 6 March 2013 (EST)
			:::Perhaps, to keep it simple, a "Toys" header followed by simply "See: Bulkhead (Prime)#toys"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 6 March 2013 (EST)