Talk:Canopy - Revision history

Cylasbreakdown at 03:05, 25 January 2019

2019-01-25T03:05:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 25 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It was never explicitly stated. It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2018 (EDT)		Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It was never explicitly stated. It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2018 (EDT)
	:While it may never have been explicitly stated, I don't think there's any chance he could've been a Decepticon. The way the films portray the two factions is pretty consistent, with Canopy's attitude and head design both being quite friendly. When the TRF kill him it's presented as a big tragedy. I can't think of another non-turncoat Decepticon the films have treated this way. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but there haven't really been any unaligned bots in the movies themselves (other than Lockdown I guess). So yes, it's ''technically possible'' that he's a Decepticon, but if the scenario you present ''was'' the case then the movie itself would be making a big deal over it. It's not, so that's not what happened. I don't see the point in messing with how he's been categorised here. --[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 04:17, 5 August 2018 (EDT)		:While it may never have been explicitly stated, I don't think there's any chance he could've been a Decepticon. The way the films portray the two factions is pretty consistent, with Canopy's attitude and head design both being quite friendly. When the TRF kill him it's presented as a big tragedy. I can't think of another non-turncoat Decepticon the films have treated this way. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but there haven't really been any unaligned bots in the movies themselves (other than Lockdown I guess). So yes, it's ''technically possible'' that he's a Decepticon, but if the scenario you present ''was'' the case then the movie itself would be making a big deal over it. It's not, so that's not what happened. I don't see the point in messing with how he's been categorised here. --[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 04:17, 5 August 2018 (EDT)

			:Gotcha. Possible but not probable. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 22:05, 24 January 2019 (EST)

The Wadapan at 08:17, 5 August 2018

2018-08-05T08:17:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 5 August 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It was never explicitly stated. It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2018 (EDT)		Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It was never explicitly stated. It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2018 (EDT)
			:While it may never have been explicitly stated, I don't think there's any chance he could've been a Decepticon. The way the films portray the two factions is pretty consistent, with Canopy's attitude and head design both being quite friendly. When the TRF kill him it's presented as a big tragedy. I can't think of another non-turncoat Decepticon the films have treated this way. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but there haven't really been any unaligned bots in the movies themselves (other than Lockdown I guess). So yes, it's ''technically possible'' that he's a Decepticon, but if the scenario you present ''was'' the case then the movie itself would be making a big deal over it. It's not, so that's not what happened. I don't see the point in messing with how he's been categorised here. --[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 04:17, 5 August 2018 (EDT)

Cylasbreakdown at 21:24, 4 August 2018

2018-08-04T21:24:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 4 August 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated.		Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It was never explicitly stated. It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2018 (EDT)

Cylasbreakdown: Created page with "Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated."

2018-08-04T21:22:32Z

Created page with "Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated."

New page

Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 25 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It was never explicitly stated. It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2018 (EDT)		Quick question: How do we know for sure that Canopy is an Autobot? It was never explicitly stated. It's unlikely, but a Decepticon could have seen that Izabella wanted to help and reciprocated. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2018 (EDT)
	:While it may never have been explicitly stated, I don't think there's any chance he could've been a Decepticon. The way the films portray the two factions is pretty consistent, with Canopy's attitude and head design both being quite friendly. When the TRF kill him it's presented as a big tragedy. I can't think of another non-turncoat Decepticon the films have treated this way. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but there haven't really been any unaligned bots in the movies themselves (other than Lockdown I guess). So yes, it's ''technically possible'' that he's a Decepticon, but if the scenario you present ''was'' the case then the movie itself would be making a big deal over it. It's not, so that's not what happened. I don't see the point in messing with how he's been categorised here. --[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 04:17, 5 August 2018 (EDT)		:While it may never have been explicitly stated, I don't think there's any chance he could've been a Decepticon. The way the films portray the two factions is pretty consistent, with Canopy's attitude and head design both being quite friendly. When the TRF kill him it's presented as a big tragedy. I can't think of another non-turncoat Decepticon the films have treated this way. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but there haven't really been any unaligned bots in the movies themselves (other than Lockdown I guess). So yes, it's ''technically possible'' that he's a Decepticon, but if the scenario you present ''was'' the case then the movie itself would be making a big deal over it. It's not, so that's not what happened. I don't see the point in messing with how he's been categorised here. --[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 04:17, 5 August 2018 (EDT)

			:Gotcha. Possible but not probable. [[User:Cylasbreakdown\|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown\|talk]]) 22:05, 24 January 2019 (EST)