Talk:Chop Shop (RID) - Revision history

M Sipher at 00:58, 19 May 2016

2016-05-19T00:58:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 19 May 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)		I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)
	: I personally wouldn't have a problem with it, but Chop Shop is kind of a weird case as combiners go; it's not clear how much of Chop Shop is Righty or vice versa. A lot of info would just be duplicated from this page. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 20:33, 18 May 2016 (EDT)		: I personally wouldn't have a problem with it, but Chop Shop is kind of a weird case as combiners go; it's not clear how much of Chop Shop is Righty or vice versa. A lot of info would just be duplicated from this page. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 20:33, 18 May 2016 (EDT)
			::No. It'd be utterly pointless to split the page. We'd just be making people link-hop for nothing. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:58, 18 May 2016 (EDT)

Locoman at 00:33, 19 May 2016

2016-05-19T00:33:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 19 May 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)		I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)
	: I personally wouldn't have a problem at it, but Chop Shop is kind of a weird case as combiners go; it's not clear how much of Chop Shop is Righty or vice versa. A lot of info would just be duplicated from this page. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 20:33, 18 May 2016 (EDT)		: I personally wouldn't have a problem with it, but Chop Shop is kind of a weird case as combiners go; it's not clear how much of Chop Shop is Righty or vice versa. A lot of info would just be duplicated from this page. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 20:33, 18 May 2016 (EDT)

Locoman at 00:33, 19 May 2016

2016-05-19T00:33:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 19 May 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)		I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)
			: I personally wouldn't have a problem at it, but Chop Shop is kind of a weird case as combiners go; it's not clear how much of Chop Shop is Righty or vice versa. A lot of info would just be duplicated from this page. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 20:33, 18 May 2016 (EDT)

Energizer: /* Giving Righty a page */ new section

2016-05-19T00:13:19Z

Giving Righty a page: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 19 May 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Junkheap117		Junkheap117
	:No, because at no point did Grimlock show revulsion over Chop Shop's eyes, which he did when referring to the unnamed Decepticon. And Grimlock is not shy about those things. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:46, 2 April 2016 (EDT)		:No, because at no point did Grimlock show revulsion over Chop Shop's eyes, which he did when referring to the unnamed Decepticon. And Grimlock is not shy about those things. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:46, 2 April 2016 (EDT)

			== Giving Righty a page ==

			I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)

M Sipher at 23:46, 2 April 2016

2016-04-02T23:46:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 2 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{delete}}~~
	When the autobots discuss the decepticons they have faught, and grimlock says the one with all the eyes, is he nkt just reffering to Chop Shop, having 4 eyes, 2 more than any other con?		When the autobots discuss the decepticons they have faught, and grimlock says the one with all the eyes, is he nkt just reffering to Chop Shop, having 4 eyes, 2 more than any other con?
	Junkheap117		Junkheap117
			:No, because at no point did Grimlock show revulsion over Chop Shop's eyes, which he did when referring to the unnamed Decepticon. And Grimlock is not shy about those things. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:46, 2 April 2016 (EDT)

Saix at 23:39, 2 April 2016

2016-04-02T23:39:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 2 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{delete}}
	When the autobots discuss the decepticons they have faught, and grimlock says the one with all the eyes, is he nkt just reffering to Chop Shop, having 4 eyes, 2 more than any other con?		When the autobots discuss the decepticons they have faught, and grimlock says the one with all the eyes, is he nkt just reffering to Chop Shop, having 4 eyes, 2 more than any other con?
	Junkheap117		Junkheap117

Junkheap117: Created page with "When the autobots discuss the decepticons they have faught, and grimlock says the one with all the eyes, is he nkt just reffering to Chop Shop, having 4 eyes, 2 more than any ..."

2016-04-02T23:07:14Z

Created page with "When the autobots discuss the decepticons they have faught, and grimlock says the one with all the eyes, is he nkt just reffering to Chop Shop, having 4 eyes, 2 more than any ..."

New page

When the autobots discuss the decepticons they have faught, and grimlock says the one with all the eyes, is he nkt just reffering to Chop Shop, having 4 eyes, 2 more than any other con?
Junkheap117

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 19 May 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)		I know this would be frowned upon, but does anyone thing that the Chop Shop component Righty should have a separate page or something? [[User:Energizer\|Energizer]] ([[User talk:Energizer\|talk]]) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (EDT)
	: I personally wouldn't have a problem with it, but Chop Shop is kind of a weird case as combiners go; it's not clear how much of Chop Shop is Righty or vice versa. A lot of info would just be duplicated from this page. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 20:33, 18 May 2016 (EDT)		: I personally wouldn't have a problem with it, but Chop Shop is kind of a weird case as combiners go; it's not clear how much of Chop Shop is Righty or vice versa. A lot of info would just be duplicated from this page. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 20:33, 18 May 2016 (EDT)
			::No. It'd be utterly pointless to split the page. We'd just be making people link-hop for nothing. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:58, 18 May 2016 (EDT)