Talk:Chromia (G1) - Revision history

M Sipher: /* Idea for Chromia */

2026-03-19T16:17:26Z

Idea for Chromia

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 19 March 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Since siege Chromia has 3 repaints, maybe we should put a "see also" in the POTP girl mold		Since siege Chromia has 3 repaints, maybe we should put a "see also" in the POTP girl mold
	to show them there, just solely for transformation if anything.[[User:Poliwag06\|Poliwag06]] ([[User talk:Poliwag06\|talk]]) 22:34, 1 October 2023 (EDT)		to show them there, just solely for transformation if anything.[[User:Poliwag06\|Poliwag06]] ([[User talk:Poliwag06\|talk]]) 22:34, 1 October 2023 (EDT)


			==Siege "retool"==
			Sorry, but Siege Chromia is at a point where I think calling her a "retool" is at most barely ''teeeeechnically'' not-untrue. She shares what, less than 10% of her parts with other figures? If we need to do that much clarifying, that should probably not be crammed into an already kinda-chunky intro and kinda breaking the flow of information within it. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 12:17, 19 March 2026 (EDT)

Poliwag06: /* Idea for Chromia */ new section

2023-10-02T02:34:18Z

Idea for Chromia: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 2 October 2023
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::Those examples you list are, like, two toys which aren't even the same size as each other and share zero sculpting detail, so of course they're not retools. Even a cursory glance at images of Arcee and Chromia will tell you they are not something like that. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 February 2015 (EST)		::Those examples you list are, like, two toys which aren't even the same size as each other and share zero sculpting detail, so of course they're not retools. Even a cursory glance at images of Arcee and Chromia will tell you they are not something like that. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 February 2015 (EST)
	:::So is she officially confimed as a PRID Arcee retool?[[User:Pat\|Pat]] ([[User talk:Pat\|talk]]) 02:42, 13 February 2015 (EST)		:::So is she officially confimed as a PRID Arcee retool?[[User:Pat\|Pat]] ([[User talk:Pat\|talk]]) 02:42, 13 February 2015 (EST)

			== Idea for Chromia ==

			Since siege Chromia has 3 repaints, maybe we should put a "see also" in the POTP girl mold
			to show them there, just solely for transformation if anything.[[User:Poliwag06\|Poliwag06]] ([[User talk:Poliwag06\|talk]]) 22:34, 1 October 2023 (EDT)

Pat: /* Generations Figure */

2015-02-13T07:42:57Z

Generations Figure

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 13 February 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Is she really a heavy retool? Or is she just sharing a transformation with PRID Arcee, like G2 Smokescreen and Energon Starscream or DOTM Roadbuster and AOE Lockdown?		Is she really a heavy retool? Or is she just sharing a transformation with PRID Arcee, like G2 Smokescreen and Energon Starscream or DOTM Roadbuster and AOE Lockdown?
	::Those examples you list are, like, two toys which aren't even the same size as each other and share zero sculpting detail, so of course they're not retools. Even a cursory glance at images of Arcee and Chromia will tell you they are not something like that. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 February 2015 (EST)		::Those examples you list are, like, two toys which aren't even the same size as each other and share zero sculpting detail, so of course they're not retools. Even a cursory glance at images of Arcee and Chromia will tell you they are not something like that. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 February 2015 (EST)
			:::So is she officially confimed as a PRID Arcee retool?[[User:Pat\|Pat]] ([[User talk:Pat\|talk]]) 02:42, 13 February 2015 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Generations Figure */

2015-02-10T01:52:50Z

Generations Figure

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 10 February 2015
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:Don't think it was stated outright by Hasbro people, but she features parts that are very clearly the exact same as ones from Arcee. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:38, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:Don't think it was stated outright by Hasbro people, but she features parts that are very clearly the exact same as ones from Arcee. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:38, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	Is she really a heavy retool? Or is she just sharing a transformation with PRID Arcee, like G2 Smokescreen and Energon Starscream or DOTM Roadbuster and AOE Lockdown?		Is she really a heavy retool? Or is she just sharing a transformation with PRID Arcee, like G2 Smokescreen and Energon Starscream or DOTM Roadbuster and AOE Lockdown?
			::Those examples you list are, like, two toys which aren't even the same size as each other and share zero sculpting detail, so of course they're not retools. Even a cursory glance at images of Arcee and Chromia will tell you they are not something like that. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 February 2015 (EST)

Pat: /* Generations Figure */

2015-02-10T01:18:33Z

Generations Figure

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 10 February 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:I'm almost positive they said Chromia is a new mold. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:I'm almost positive they said Chromia is a new mold. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	:Don't think it was stated outright by Hasbro people, but she features parts that are very clearly the exact same as ones from Arcee. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:38, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:Don't think it was stated outright by Hasbro people, but she features parts that are very clearly the exact same as ones from Arcee. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:38, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
			Is she really a heavy retool? Or is she just sharing a transformation with PRID Arcee, like G2 Smokescreen and Energon Starscream or DOTM Roadbuster and AOE Lockdown?

Jalaguy: /* Generations Figure */

2014-06-24T16:38:21Z

Generations Figure

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 24 June 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Was it stated at BotCon that she was a retool of PRID Arcee, or are people just asserting this from the images shown? [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 12:29, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		Was it stated at BotCon that she was a retool of PRID Arcee, or are people just asserting this from the images shown? [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 12:29, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	:I'm almost positive they said Chromia is a new mold. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:I'm almost positive they said Chromia is a new mold. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
			:Don't think it was stated outright by Hasbro people, but she features parts that are very clearly the exact same as ones from Arcee. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:38, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Dark T Zeratul: /* Generations Figure */

2014-06-24T16:36:06Z

Generations Figure

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 24 June 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Was it stated at BotCon that she was a retool of PRID Arcee, or are people just asserting this from the images shown? [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 12:29, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		Was it stated at BotCon that she was a retool of PRID Arcee, or are people just asserting this from the images shown? [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 12:29, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
			:I'm almost positive they said Chromia is a new mold. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Magaroja: /* Generations Figure */ new section

2014-06-24T16:29:22Z

Generations Figure: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 24 June 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::I meant if they participated in the designs of recent female Transformer figures that have stereotypical feminine designs features (perhaps even adding those design cues themselves), then they are partly responsible for perpetuating 'problem'. Such as it is. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)		::::::I meant if they participated in the designs of recent female Transformer figures that have stereotypical feminine designs features (perhaps even adding those design cues themselves), then they are partly responsible for perpetuating 'problem'. Such as it is. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::Well, yes, of course. And? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)		:::::::Well, yes, of course. And? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

			== Generations Figure ==

			Was it stated at BotCon that she was a retool of PRID Arcee, or are people just asserting this from the images shown? [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 12:29, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Starfield: Talk:Chromia moved to Talk:Chromia (G1): ROTF Chromia

2009-05-05T22:09:33Z

Talk:Chromia moved to Talk:Chromia (G1): ROTF Chromia

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:09, 5 May 2009
(No difference)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-25T00:49:40Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 25 March 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::I'm pretty sure Aaron and co aren't responsible for the G1 Female Autobots! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)		:::::I'm pretty sure Aaron and co aren't responsible for the G1 Female Autobots! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
	::::::I meant if they participated in the designs of recent female Transformer figures that have stereotypical feminine designs features (perhaps even adding those design cues themselves), then they are partly responsible for perpetuating 'problem'. Such as it is. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)		::::::I meant if they participated in the designs of recent female Transformer figures that have stereotypical feminine designs features (perhaps even adding those design cues themselves), then they are partly responsible for perpetuating 'problem'. Such as it is. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::Well, yes, of course. And? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		:::::::Well, yes, of course. And? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 24 June 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Was it stated at BotCon that she was a retool of PRID Arcee, or are people just asserting this from the images shown? [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 12:29, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		Was it stated at BotCon that she was a retool of PRID Arcee, or are people just asserting this from the images shown? [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 12:29, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	:I'm almost positive they said Chromia is a new mold. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:I'm almost positive they said Chromia is a new mold. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
			:Don't think it was stated outright by Hasbro people, but she features parts that are very clearly the exact same as ones from Arcee. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:38, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 25 March 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::I'm pretty sure Aaron and co aren't responsible for the G1 Female Autobots! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)		:::::I'm pretty sure Aaron and co aren't responsible for the G1 Female Autobots! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
	::::::I meant if they participated in the designs of recent female Transformer figures that have stereotypical feminine designs features (perhaps even adding those design cues themselves), then they are partly responsible for perpetuating 'problem'. Such as it is. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)		::::::I meant if they participated in the designs of recent female Transformer figures that have stereotypical feminine designs features (perhaps even adding those design cues themselves), then they are partly responsible for perpetuating 'problem'. Such as it is. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::Well, yes, of course. And? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		:::::::Well, yes, of course. And? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)