Talk:Cloning - Revision history

166.248.67.177: /* Megaplex */

2012-06-08T02:50:39Z

Megaplex

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 8 June 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	==Megaplex==		==Megaplex==
	Isn't Machine Wars Megaplex a clone of Machine Wars Megatron?[[Special:Contributions/70.17.201.221\|70.17.201.221]] 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)		Isn't Machine Wars Megaplex a clone of Machine Wars Megatron?[[Special:Contributions/70.17.201.221\|70.17.201.221]] 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)

			==Things that are clones but haven't been mentioned==
			over a year after people mentioned Megaplex and Nemesis Prime, still not on the page? Also isn't Black Rodimus a clone? And Nemesis Breaker? --[[Special:Contributions/166.248.67.177\|166.248.67.177]] 22:50, 7 June 2012 (EDT)

70.17.201.221 at 04:49, 28 December 2010

2010-12-28T04:49:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 28 December 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==RiD==		==RiD==
	Since Scourge's body is technically a partial clone of Prime's, should he be included? [[User:Eire]] 01.02 Aug 6 09 (UTC)		Since Scourge's body is technically a partial clone of Prime's, should he be included? [[User:Eire]] 01.02 Aug 6 09 (UTC)

			==Nemesis Prime==
			Aren't most Nemesis Primes (Nemeses Prime?) clones of their respective Optimi/Optimuses?[[Special:Contributions/70.17.201.221\|70.17.201.221]] 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)

			==Megaplex==
			Isn't Machine Wars Megaplex a clone of Machine Wars Megatron?[[Special:Contributions/70.17.201.221\|70.17.201.221]] 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)

Eire at 00:02, 6 August 2009

2009-08-06T00:02:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 6 August 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[First (and Second) in Flight\|Rise of Safeguard]] states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)		[[First (and Second) in Flight\|Rise of Safeguard]] states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
	:A note would be appropriate explaining the discrepancy, but toy bios are "actual fiction." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:15, 27 May 2009 (EDT)		:A note would be appropriate explaining the discrepancy, but toy bios are "actual fiction." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:15, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
			==RiD==
			Since Scourge's body is technically a partial clone of Prime's, should he be included? [[User:Eire]] 01.02 Aug 6 09 (UTC)

Jimsorenson at 18:57, 20 June 2009

2009-06-20T18:57:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 20 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Jet Twins as "Clones"==		==Jet Twins as "Clones"==
	[[Rise of Safeguard]] states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)		[[First (and Second) in Flight\|Rise of Safeguard]] states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
	:A note would be appropriate explaining the discrepancy, but toy bios are "actual fiction." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:15, 27 May 2009 (EDT)		:A note would be appropriate explaining the discrepancy, but toy bios are "actual fiction." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:15, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Jet Twins as "Clones" */

2009-05-27T17:15:38Z

Jet Twins as "Clones"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 27 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Jet Twins as "Clones"==		==Jet Twins as "Clones"==
	[[Rise of Safeguard]] states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)		[[Rise of Safeguard]] states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
			:A note would be appropriate explaining the discrepancy, but toy bios are "actual fiction." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 13:15, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

Jeysie: New page: ==Jet Twins as "Clones"== Rise of Safeguard states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & c...

2009-05-27T17:06:49Z

New page: ==Jet Twins as "Clones"== Rise of Safeguard states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & c...

New page

==Jet Twins as "Clones"==
[[Rise of Safeguard]] states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then ''modified'' by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)