Talk:Cybertronian: The Unofficial Transformers Recognition Guide - Revision history

Abates: /* There's a big library upstate with lots of other books to play with... */

2015-05-06T22:20:00Z

There's a big library upstate with lots of other books to play with...

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 6 May 2015
Line 93:		Line 93:
	Does someone want to pull the trigger? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:41, 6 May 2015 (EDT)		Does someone want to pull the trigger? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:41, 6 May 2015 (EDT)
	:Hard to argue against. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (EDT)		:Hard to argue against. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (EDT)
			:I think the writeup on the unofficial guidebooks page could be expanded a bit (it doesn't mention this is actually multiple books) but yes, I think the full article isn't needed. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 18:20, 6 May 2015 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* There's a big library upstate with lots of other books to play with... */

2015-05-06T21:59:12Z

There's a big library upstate with lots of other books to play with...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 6 May 2015
Line 92:		Line 92:

	Does someone want to pull the trigger? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:41, 6 May 2015 (EDT)		Does someone want to pull the trigger? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:41, 6 May 2015 (EDT)
			:Hard to argue against. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (EDT)

Thylacine 2000 at 21:41, 6 May 2015

2015-05-06T21:41:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 6 May 2015
Line 84:		Line 84:
	:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)		:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)
	::::::Hmmmmmmmmmm. Now I'm leaning towards keeping with an Apocrypha tag. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:47, 4 November 2010 (EDT)		::::::Hmmmmmmmmmm. Now I'm leaning towards keeping with an Apocrypha tag. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:47, 4 November 2010 (EDT)


			== There's a big library upstate with lots of other books to play with... ==
			As this site continues - rightly - to hold the line against 3P products, I think it is becoming ever less justifiable for this page to exist. These books are very nice and most everyone likes them, and they're unofficial and don't really belong here. It's a well-written article about well-written books, but I just don't see how it gets to stay if Hegemon and Maniaking and all that horde are quarantined.

			I think it's time to finally let this one go. It has a perfectly decent brief writeup on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page.

			Does someone want to pull the trigger? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:41, 6 May 2015 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* So...about deleting this page */

2010-11-04T12:47:38Z

So...about deleting this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 4 November 2010
Line 83:		Line 83:
	::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
	:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)		:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)
			::::::Hmmmmmmmmmm. Now I'm leaning towards keeping with an Apocrypha tag. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:47, 4 November 2010 (EDT)

Drmick: /* So...about deleting this page */

2010-11-03T12:12:51Z

So...about deleting this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 3 November 2010
Line 82:		Line 82:
	:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
	::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
			:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* So...about deleting this page */

2010-11-01T21:54:35Z

So...about deleting this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 1 November 2010
Line 81:		Line 81:
	::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
	:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
			::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)

Semysane: /* So...about deleting this page */

2010-11-01T21:32:52Z

So...about deleting this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 1 November 2010
Line 80:		Line 80:
	:I think you will find that more than one person suggested keeping it. I don't understand this fixation with removing everything from the wiki that isn't 100% official. If you are pre-occupied with keeping the rules try going to church more often. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 07:47, 31 October 2010 (EDT)		:I think you will find that more than one person suggested keeping it. I don't understand this fixation with removing everything from the wiki that isn't 100% official. If you are pre-occupied with keeping the rules try going to church more often. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 07:47, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
	::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
			:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)

Interrobang: /* So...about deleting this page */

2010-11-01T20:40:11Z

So...about deleting this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 1 November 2010
Line 79:		Line 79:

	:I think you will find that more than one person suggested keeping it. I don't understand this fixation with removing everything from the wiki that isn't 100% official. If you are pre-occupied with keeping the rules try going to church more often. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 07:47, 31 October 2010 (EDT)		:I think you will find that more than one person suggested keeping it. I don't understand this fixation with removing everything from the wiki that isn't 100% official. If you are pre-occupied with keeping the rules try going to church more often. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 07:47, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
			::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)

Drmick: /* So...about deleting this page */

2010-10-31T11:47:02Z

So...about deleting this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 31 October 2010
Line 77:		Line 77:
	== So...about deleting this page ==		== So...about deleting this page ==
	Going by the discussion above, the motion to delete had four votes and short of a single enthusiastic defense by one particular editor it seems no major counter motion to save it was made. Is there a reason this hasn't been deleted yet or was it simply forgotten about? --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 00:00, 31 October 2010 (EDT)		Going by the discussion above, the motion to delete had four votes and short of a single enthusiastic defense by one particular editor it seems no major counter motion to save it was made. Is there a reason this hasn't been deleted yet or was it simply forgotten about? --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 00:00, 31 October 2010 (EDT)

			:I think you will find that more than one person suggested keeping it. I don't understand this fixation with removing everything from the wiki that isn't 100% official. If you are pre-occupied with keeping the rules try going to church more often. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 07:47, 31 October 2010 (EDT)

Tigerpaw28 at 04:00, 31 October 2010

2010-10-31T04:00:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 31 October 2010
Line 74:		Line 74:
	== Cybertronain - Transformers Field Guide ==		== Cybertronain - Transformers Field Guide ==
	I'm surprised this isn't mentioned. Poking around, found [http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=350216133249 it on eBay]. Unless there's a difference compared to the others...? --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 08:40, 9 July 2009 (EDT)		I'm surprised this isn't mentioned. Poking around, found [http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=350216133249 it on eBay]. Unless there's a difference compared to the others...? --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 08:40, 9 July 2009 (EDT)

			== So...about deleting this page ==
			Going by the discussion above, the motion to delete had four votes and short of a single enthusiastic defense by one particular editor it seems no major counter motion to save it was made. Is there a reason this hasn't been deleted yet or was it simply forgotten about? --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 00:00, 31 October 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 6 May 2015
Line 93:		Line 93:
	Does someone want to pull the trigger? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:41, 6 May 2015 (EDT)		Does someone want to pull the trigger? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 17:41, 6 May 2015 (EDT)
	:Hard to argue against. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (EDT)		:Hard to argue against. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (EDT)
			:I think the writeup on the unofficial guidebooks page could be expanded a bit (it doesn't mention this is actually multiple books) but yes, I think the full article isn't needed. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 18:20, 6 May 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 4 November 2010
Line 83:		Line 83:
	::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
	:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)		:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)
			::::::Hmmmmmmmmmm. Now I'm leaning towards keeping with an Apocrypha tag. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:47, 4 November 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 3 November 2010
Line 82:		Line 82:
	:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
	::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
			:::::Well, Doug Dlin, is now an official creator, and ironically a moderator on the wiki. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 08:12, 3 November 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 1 November 2010
Line 81:		Line 81:
	::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
	:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
			::::If it can be shown that official creators have utilized it, it can stay (possibly with an apocrypha tag). If not, an overview on the [[Unofficial guidebooks]] page should suffice. Such guidebooks are an important phenomenon that should be recognized but they generally don't fit our mandate. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:54, 1 November 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 1 November 2010
Line 80:		Line 80:
	:I think you will find that more than one person suggested keeping it. I don't understand this fixation with removing everything from the wiki that isn't 100% official. If you are pre-occupied with keeping the rules try going to church more often. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 07:47, 31 October 2010 (EDT)		:I think you will find that more than one person suggested keeping it. I don't understand this fixation with removing everything from the wiki that isn't 100% official. If you are pre-occupied with keeping the rules try going to church more often. [[User:Drmick\|Drmick]] 07:47, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
	::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)		::This is probably the most inane comment I've read on this wiki. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
			:::I kinda wonder why this is here at all if it isn't official. I thought we had an official-only policy. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 17:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)