Talk:Cybertronian language - Revision history

Astrobotix at 12:05, 21 March 2024

2024-03-21T12:05:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 21 March 2024
Line 35:		Line 35:

	:This official picture of the High Moon Studios font created by Jared Adkins really should be added to the main page: http://jaredadkins.com/#projects-transformersfoc & http://jaredadkins.com/images/TransformersFOC_FontGlyphs.jpg [[User:Astrobotix\|Astrobotix]] ([[User talk:Astrobotix\|talk]]) 03:02, 11 April 2023 (EDT)		:This official picture of the High Moon Studios font created by Jared Adkins really should be added to the main page: http://jaredadkins.com/#projects-transformersfoc & http://jaredadkins.com/images/TransformersFOC_FontGlyphs.jpg [[User:Astrobotix\|Astrobotix]] ([[User talk:Astrobotix\|talk]]) 03:02, 11 April 2023 (EDT)

			==Live-action films==
			[[File:Ben_Proctor_Alphabet.jpg\|upright=1.5\|thumb\|Ben Procter alphabet on the AllSpark and Staff of Merlin]]
			The alphabet designed by [[Ben Procter]] has been used extensively throughout the films but has never been translated. [[User:Astrobotix\|Astrobotix]] ([[User talk:Astrobotix\|talk]]) 08:05, 21 March 2024 (EDT)

Astrobotix: /* War For Cybertron: yet another unique Cybertronian language (High Moon Studios) */

2023-04-11T07:02:39Z

War For Cybertron: yet another unique Cybertronian language (High Moon Studios)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 11 April 2023
Line 33:		Line 33:
	==War For Cybertron: yet another unique Cybertronian language (High Moon Studios)==		==War For Cybertron: yet another unique Cybertronian language (High Moon Studios)==
	According to this source, a Cybertron alphabet was created for the game "War For Cybertron". "High Moon Studios created a Cybertron alphabet and font for the game, and Hasbro happily signed off on it. Their source? They found one single frame in one episode of the Transformers cartoon that featured some glyph-like characters in a monument". Interestingly enough this font differs from that developed by Jim Sorenson using the same methods. The WFC language is noted by some as being far superior (as it is an officially developed language approved by Hasbro) in comparison to both his fan-made Autobot font and the live-action Cyberglyphics. It is translatable via the various unlockable concept art provided in-game and many of the display screens throughout the levels feature in-depth text revealing more of the background story.--[[User:RATCHATT\|RATCHATT]] 00:35, 24 July 2011 (EDT)		According to this source, a Cybertron alphabet was created for the game "War For Cybertron". "High Moon Studios created a Cybertron alphabet and font for the game, and Hasbro happily signed off on it. Their source? They found one single frame in one episode of the Transformers cartoon that featured some glyph-like characters in a monument". Interestingly enough this font differs from that developed by Jim Sorenson using the same methods. The WFC language is noted by some as being far superior (as it is an officially developed language approved by Hasbro) in comparison to both his fan-made Autobot font and the live-action Cyberglyphics. It is translatable via the various unlockable concept art provided in-game and many of the display screens throughout the levels feature in-depth text revealing more of the background story.--[[User:RATCHATT\|RATCHATT]] 00:35, 24 July 2011 (EDT)

			:This official picture of the High Moon Studios font created by Jared Adkins really should be added to the main page: http://jaredadkins.com/#projects-transformersfoc & http://jaredadkins.com/images/TransformersFOC_FontGlyphs.jpg [[User:Astrobotix\|Astrobotix]] ([[User talk:Astrobotix\|talk]]) 03:02, 11 April 2023 (EDT)

SanityOrMadness: moved Talk:Cybertronian languages to Talk:Cybertronian language: Singular

2013-02-19T03:32:53Z

moved Talk:Cybertronian languages to Talk:Cybertronian language: Singular

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:32, 19 February 2013
(No difference)

124.185.29.249 at 03:48, 25 July 2011

2011-07-25T03:48:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 25 July 2011
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Vol. 1 contains writing on the wall ("Till All Are One"), which is just fanciful, modified-to-look-"alien" Roman lettering. Worse, there's writing on a building that's just the Japanese Transformers logo in katakana.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 09:48, 30 November 2010 (EST)		Vol. 1 contains writing on the wall ("Till All Are One"), which is just fanciful, modified-to-look-"alien" Roman lettering. Worse, there's writing on a building that's just the Japanese Transformers logo in katakana.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 09:48, 30 November 2010 (EST)

			==War For Cybertron: yet another unique Cybertronian language (High Moon Studios)==
			According to this source, a Cybertron alphabet was created for the game "War For Cybertron". "High Moon Studios created a Cybertron alphabet and font for the game, and Hasbro happily signed off on it. Their source? They found one single frame in one episode of the Transformers cartoon that featured some glyph-like characters in a monument". Interestingly enough this font differs from that developed by Jim Sorenson using the same methods. The WFC language is noted by some as being far superior (as it is an officially developed language approved by Hasbro) in comparison to both his fan-made Autobot font and the live-action Cyberglyphics. It is translatable via the various unlockable concept art provided in-game and many of the display screens throughout the levels feature in-depth text revealing more of the background story.--[[User:RATCHATT\|RATCHATT]] 00:35, 24 July 2011 (EDT)

Nevermore: /* War Within */

2010-11-30T14:49:39Z

War Within

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 30 November 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== War Within ==		== War Within ==

	Vol. 1 contains writing on the wall ("Till All Are One"), which is just fanciful, modified-to-look-"alien" Roman lettering.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 09:48, 30 November 2010 (EST)		Vol. 1 contains writing on the wall ("Till All Are One"), which is just fanciful, modified-to-look-"alien" Roman lettering. Worse, there's writing on a building that's just the Japanese Transformers logo in katakana.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 09:48, 30 November 2010 (EST)

Nevermore: /* War Within */ new section

2010-11-30T14:48:59Z

War Within: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 30 November 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)		::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)
	:::Uhm, movie Cybertronian was their lines spoken backwards. [http://www.allspark.com/content/view/6225/20/ Paramount press junket coverage] --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 03:33, 28 February 2010 (EST)		:::Uhm, movie Cybertronian was their lines spoken backwards. [http://www.allspark.com/content/view/6225/20/ Paramount press junket coverage] --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 03:33, 28 February 2010 (EST)

			== War Within ==

			Vol. 1 contains writing on the wall ("Till All Are One"), which is just fanciful, modified-to-look-"alien" Roman lettering.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 09:48, 30 November 2010 (EST)

Lonegamer78: /* Uh... */

2010-02-28T08:33:45Z

Uh...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 28 February 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)		::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)
	::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)		::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)
			:::Uhm, movie Cybertronian was their lines spoken backwards. [http://www.allspark.com/content/view/6225/20/ Paramount press junket coverage] --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 03:33, 28 February 2010 (EST)

Detour: /* Uh... */

2010-02-28T08:23:35Z

Uh...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 28 February 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)		: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)
	::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)		::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)
			::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)

Semysane: /* Uh... */

2010-02-28T08:07:54Z

Uh...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 28 February 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Is it worth mentioning that movie Cybertronian is sped-up Tutankhamen, which could be related to the Solar Harvester in Giza? [[Special:Contributions/72.67.21.14\|72.67.21.14]] 00:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)		Is it worth mentioning that movie Cybertronian is sped-up Tutankhamen, which could be related to the Solar Harvester in Giza? [[Special:Contributions/72.67.21.14\|72.67.21.14]] 00:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)
	: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)		: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)
			::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Uh... */

2010-02-28T05:48:00Z

Uh...

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:48, 28 February 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Is it worth mentioning that movie Cybertronian is sped-up Tutankhamen, which could be related to the Solar Harvester in Giza? [[Special:Contributions/72.67.21.14\|72.67.21.14]] 00:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)		Is it worth mentioning that movie Cybertronian is sped-up Tutankhamen, which could be related to the Solar Harvester in Giza? [[Special:Contributions/72.67.21.14\|72.67.21.14]] 00:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)
			: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 28 February 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)		::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)
	::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)		::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)
			:::Uhm, movie Cybertronian was their lines spoken backwards. [http://www.allspark.com/content/view/6225/20/ Paramount press junket coverage] --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 03:33, 28 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 28 February 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)		: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)
	::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)		::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)
			::Is there a source on this, though? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 28 February 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Is it worth mentioning that movie Cybertronian is sped-up Tutankhamen, which could be related to the Solar Harvester in Giza? [[Special:Contributions/72.67.21.14\|72.67.21.14]] 00:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)		Is it worth mentioning that movie Cybertronian is sped-up Tutankhamen, which could be related to the Solar Harvester in Giza? [[Special:Contributions/72.67.21.14\|72.67.21.14]] 00:23, 28 February 2010 (EST)
	: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)		: Probably worth mentioning. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)
			::Odd, I thought Tutankhamen was a person. Wikipedia seems to agree with me (that doesn't necessarily mean much, mind you). -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 03:07, 28 February 2010 (EST)