Talk:Cyberverse (toyline) - Revision history

Broadside: /* Move */ new section

2018-07-07T11:47:35Z

Move: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 7 July 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)		::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)
	:::And if this one has a Cyberverse logo on the back, then it goes here. In the meantime, people will have to go to any other Transformers news site or one of the five individual members' pages or the Prime Predacon page to learn that this exists. I'm okay with that. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 10:55, 20 May 2013 (EDT)		:::And if this one has a Cyberverse logo on the back, then it goes here. In the meantime, people will have to go to any other Transformers news site or one of the five individual members' pages or the Prime Predacon page to learn that this exists. I'm okay with that. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 10:55, 20 May 2013 (EDT)

			== Move ==

			I know there's ''technically'' no contradiction, but would it be worth moving this to "Cyberverse (2011 toyline)" to avoid confusion with the upcoming toyline? --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 07:47, 7 July 2018 (EDT)

Locoman: Grum moved page Talk:Cyberverse to Talk:Cyberverse (toyline)

2017-08-03T20:10:21Z

Grum moved page Talk:Cyberverse to Talk:Cyberverse (toyline)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:10, 3 August 2017
(No difference)

LV at 14:55, 20 May 2013

2013-05-20T14:55:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 20 May 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)		:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
	::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)		::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)
			:::And if this one has a Cyberverse logo on the back, then it goes here. In the meantime, people will have to go to any other Transformers news site or one of the five individual members' pages or the Prime Predacon page to learn that this exists. I'm okay with that. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 10:55, 20 May 2013 (EDT)

Nevermore: /* Target Abominus */

2013-05-20T14:38:09Z

Target Abominus

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 20 May 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	LV removed the listing completely because the official stock photo of the packaging doesn't depict a "Cyberverse" logo. We currently still list the DOTM Bumblebee/Soundwave with bonus Rodimus pack on this page, with a note stating that the packaging doesn't officially identify it as a Cyberverse product (it's still listed here because it's the only DOTM product based on older Legends Class figures that's not formally under the Cyberverse banner, so it'd be at the very least the same situation as the Target Abominus multi-pack) so I'd like some consistency here. At the very least, Target Abominus should deserve an "honorary" mention.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:30, 17 May 2013 (EDT)		LV removed the listing completely because the official stock photo of the packaging doesn't depict a "Cyberverse" logo. We currently still list the DOTM Bumblebee/Soundwave with bonus Rodimus pack on this page, with a note stating that the packaging doesn't officially identify it as a Cyberverse product (it's still listed here because it's the only DOTM product based on older Legends Class figures that's not formally under the Cyberverse banner, so it'd be at the very least the same situation as the Target Abominus multi-pack) so I'd like some consistency here. At the very least, Target Abominus should deserve an "honorary" mention.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:30, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
	:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)		:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
			::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)

LV at 21:02, 17 May 2013

2013-05-17T21:02:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 17 May 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:

	LV removed the listing completely because the official stock photo of the packaging doesn't depict a "Cyberverse" logo. We currently still list the DOTM Bumblebee/Soundwave with bonus Rodimus pack on this page, with a note stating that the packaging doesn't officially identify it as a Cyberverse product (it's still listed here because it's the only DOTM product based on older Legends Class figures that's not formally under the Cyberverse banner, so it'd be at the very least the same situation as the Target Abominus multi-pack) so I'd like some consistency here. At the very least, Target Abominus should deserve an "honorary" mention.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:30, 17 May 2013 (EDT)		LV removed the listing completely because the official stock photo of the packaging doesn't depict a "Cyberverse" logo. We currently still list the DOTM Bumblebee/Soundwave with bonus Rodimus pack on this page, with a note stating that the packaging doesn't officially identify it as a Cyberverse product (it's still listed here because it's the only DOTM product based on older Legends Class figures that's not formally under the Cyberverse banner, so it'd be at the very least the same situation as the Target Abominus multi-pack) so I'd like some consistency here. At the very least, Target Abominus should deserve an "honorary" mention.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:30, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
			:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)

Nevermore: /* Target Abominus */ new section

2013-05-17T19:30:26Z

Target Abominus: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 17 May 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (WFC)\|Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)		On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (WFC)\|Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)

			== Target Abominus ==

			LV removed the listing completely because the official stock photo of the packaging doesn't depict a "Cyberverse" logo. We currently still list the DOTM Bumblebee/Soundwave with bonus Rodimus pack on this page, with a note stating that the packaging doesn't officially identify it as a Cyberverse product (it's still listed here because it's the only DOTM product based on older Legends Class figures that's not formally under the Cyberverse banner, so it'd be at the very least the same situation as the Target Abominus multi-pack) so I'd like some consistency here. At the very least, Target Abominus should deserve an "honorary" mention.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:30, 17 May 2013 (EDT)

Abates at 00:54, 30 March 2013

2013-03-30T00:54:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 30 March 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Who is series 2 # 012? ==		== Who is series 2 # 012? ==

	On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)		On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (WFC)\|Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)

Starfield: Undo revision 745018 by Starfield (Talk)How did that happen?

2012-08-22T22:48:01Z

Undo revision 745018 by Starfield (Talk)How did that happen?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:48, 22 August 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:

	On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)		On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)

	~~== Who is series 2 # 012? ==~~

	On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:44, 22 August 2012 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Who is series 2 # 012? */ new section

2012-08-22T22:44:35Z

Who is series 2 # 012?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 22 August 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:

	On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)		On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)

			== Who is series 2 # 012? ==

			On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:44, 22 August 2012 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Who is series 2 # 012? */ new section

2012-08-22T22:43:52Z

Who is series 2 # 012?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 22 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I know the Optimus Prime/trailer action set was revealed at Toy Fair, but was the Megatron action set revealed through any official channels? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 11:47, 16 April 2011 (EDT)		I know the Optimus Prime/trailer action set was revealed at Toy Fair, but was the Megatron action set revealed through any official channels? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 11:47, 16 April 2011 (EDT)
	:Megatron's set was seen at Toy Fair as well. I don't believe they ever told us the names for either officially. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 12:15, 16 April 2011 (EDT)		:Megatron's set was seen at Toy Fair as well. I don't believe they ever told us the names for either officially. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 12:15, 16 April 2011 (EDT)

			== Who is series 2 # 012? ==

			On both [[Flamewar (Prime)]] and [[Bumblebee (Prime)]]'s pages, both Flamewar and Quickblade Bumblebee are listed as series 2 #012. I don't know which is right. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:43, 22 August 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 20 May 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)		:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
	::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)		::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)
			:::And if this one has a Cyberverse logo on the back, then it goes here. In the meantime, people will have to go to any other Transformers news site or one of the five individual members' pages or the Prime Predacon page to learn that this exists. I'm okay with that. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 10:55, 20 May 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 20 May 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	LV removed the listing completely because the official stock photo of the packaging doesn't depict a "Cyberverse" logo. We currently still list the DOTM Bumblebee/Soundwave with bonus Rodimus pack on this page, with a note stating that the packaging doesn't officially identify it as a Cyberverse product (it's still listed here because it's the only DOTM product based on older Legends Class figures that's not formally under the Cyberverse banner, so it'd be at the very least the same situation as the Target Abominus multi-pack) so I'd like some consistency here. At the very least, Target Abominus should deserve an "honorary" mention.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:30, 17 May 2013 (EDT)		LV removed the listing completely because the official stock photo of the packaging doesn't depict a "Cyberverse" logo. We currently still list the DOTM Bumblebee/Soundwave with bonus Rodimus pack on this page, with a note stating that the packaging doesn't officially identify it as a Cyberverse product (it's still listed here because it's the only DOTM product based on older Legends Class figures that's not formally under the Cyberverse banner, so it'd be at the very least the same situation as the Target Abominus multi-pack) so I'd like some consistency here. At the very least, Target Abominus should deserve an "honorary" mention.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 15:30, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
	:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)		:The DOTM three-pack was in Cyberverse packaging in everything but logo, including all of the bright green highlights unique to Cyberverse. Maybe this package will be revealed to clearly be Predacons Rising Cyberverse except for the line name. Maybe not. In the meantime, it's not a Cyberverse toy. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 17:02, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
			::Well, Beast Hunters Cyberverse packaging only features the "Cyberverse" logo on the back, and we only have the frontal view of Abominus's packaging thus far, so I wouldn't write this one off that easily just yet.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 10:38, 20 May 2013 (EDT)