Talk:Damus - Revision history

Saix at 17:11, 14 December 2022

2022-12-14T17:11:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 14 December 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==

	Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)		Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch (G1)]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Charles RB: /* Merge? */

2016-08-01T16:02:04Z

Merge?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 1 August 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Looks like we'll be merging him with another page regardless. If you've read MTMTE 55, I'll leave merging the two to you, since I have no goddamn clue how to do it. [[User:Carprillo\|Carprillo]] ([[User talk:Carprillo\|talk]]) 11:42, 1 August 2016 (EDT)		Looks like we'll be merging him with another page regardless. If you've read MTMTE 55, I'll leave merging the two to you, since I have no goddamn clue how to do it. [[User:Carprillo\|Carprillo]] ([[User talk:Carprillo\|talk]]) 11:42, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
			:The merge is probably going to wait another week or two, for spoiler reasons. (The ''other'' name will probably be kept over Damus, since that's the more 'famous' one) -- [[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 17:01, 1 August 2016 (GMT)

Carprillo: /* Merge? */

2016-08-01T15:42:55Z

Merge?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 1 August 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	::::Well, I called it. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee\|talk]]) 12:26, 27 July 2016 (EDT)		::::Well, I called it. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee\|talk]]) 12:26, 27 July 2016 (EDT)

			Looks like we'll be merging him with another page regardless. If you've read MTMTE 55, I'll leave merging the two to you, since I have no goddamn clue how to do it. [[User:Carprillo\|Carprillo]] ([[User talk:Carprillo\|talk]]) 11:42, 1 August 2016 (EDT)

Emvee: /* Merge? */

2016-07-27T16:26:14Z

Merge?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 27 July 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)
			::::Well, I called it. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee\|talk]]) 12:26, 27 July 2016 (EDT)

Mimi at 06:39, 16 December 2014

2014-12-16T06:39:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 16 December 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==

	Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[~~Glitch (Action Master)\|~~Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)		Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Mimi: Mimi moved page Talk:Glitch (IDW) to Talk:Damus: Name in MTMTE #36 preview.

2014-12-16T06:19:19Z

Mimi moved page Talk:Glitch (IDW) to Talk:Damus: Name in MTMTE #36 preview.

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:19, 16 December 2014
(No difference)

SanityOrMadness: /* Merge? */

2014-12-06T04:57:20Z

Merge?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 6 December 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==

	Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)		Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch (Action Master)\|Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Emvee at 09:49, 3 December 2012

2012-12-03T09:49:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 3 December 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
			:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Merge? */

2012-12-03T05:03:36Z

Merge?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 3 December 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)		Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
			::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Merge? */

2012-12-03T04:16:36Z

Merge?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 3 December 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)		Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)
			: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 1 August 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	::::Well, I called it. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee\|talk]]) 12:26, 27 July 2016 (EDT)		::::Well, I called it. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee\|talk]]) 12:26, 27 July 2016 (EDT)

			Looks like we'll be merging him with another page regardless. If you've read MTMTE 55, I'll leave merging the two to you, since I have no goddamn clue how to do it. [[User:Carprillo\|Carprillo]] ([[User talk:Carprillo\|talk]]) 11:42, 1 August 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 27 July 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)
			::::Well, I called it. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee\|talk]]) 12:26, 27 July 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 16 December 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==

	Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[~~Glitch (Action Master)\|~~Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)		Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 6 December 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==

	Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)		Are we certain this is meant to be a separate character from [[Glitch (Action Master)\|Glitch]]? The Action Master partner is said to have the ability to fire "bursts of static electricity, shorting out enemy cerebral impulses." As did the later DW version. This version "has the ability to render non-sentient machinery inoperative by touching it" and is predicted to "one day ... be able to apply his skills at a distance". The existing page already states that Glitch "is portrayed differently in different continuities", is this version really different enough to warrant its own page? And, if so, what disambiguation should we use for the old page? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 22:58, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
	:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)		:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 3 December 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)		: I was wondering that, myself, but didn't know if we had enough conclusive information to make a change. It's similar, but not the same-enough. The problem is... Glitch's name is pretty clearly something else, like, somebody we probably already know. I think after we get some more information, we'll know which direction this Glitch thing is headed. A merge is premature. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)
	::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)		::Yeah, the "real name" thing bothers me too. That's why I didn't make a formal merge proposal. I really just wanted to make sure that this wasn't overlooked. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 00:03, 3 December 2012 (EST)
			:::FWIW I'm sure Glitch is an already-existing character in the IDWverse, though given the nature of ''MTMTE'' I'm almost certainly wrong about which one. But yeah, I think this page will get folded into someone else's eventually. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 04:49, 3 December 2012 (EST)