Talk:Dark Star - Revision history

Cy-Rogane: /* Bodycount */

2020-01-31T07:11:55Z

Bodycount

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:11, 31 January 2020
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Does anyone actually have a number of confirmed casualties vs confirmed survivors? I'd like to know what the ratio is. [[User:Takeshi357\|Takeshi357]] ([[User talk:Takeshi357\|talk]]) 13:16, 2 October 2015 (EDT)		Does anyone actually have a number of confirmed casualties vs confirmed survivors? I'd like to know what the ratio is. [[User:Takeshi357\|Takeshi357]] ([[User talk:Takeshi357\|talk]]) 13:16, 2 October 2015 (EDT)

			I don't know for sure but a pretty good way to determine the body count is to check which toys were discontinued in the years precciding the comic's release to get an accurate metric.
			i am in the process of doing so now, with the help of [[Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely's]] basics videos, and a Diaclone guide. --[[User:Cy-Rogane\|Cy-Rogane]] ([[User talk:Cy-Rogane\|talk]]) 02:11, 31 January 2020 (EST)

	== Other guys like Windcharger ==		== Other guys like Windcharger ==

Saix: /* Other guys like Windcharger */

2016-07-10T18:41:00Z

Other guys like Windcharger

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 10 July 2016
Line 39:		Line 39:

	<<Ignore my name, I was going through a phase 10:11, 10 July 2016 (EDT)		<<Ignore my name, I was going through a phase 10:11, 10 July 2016 (EDT)
			:We don't speculate. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:41, 10 July 2016 (EDT)

ComeonandSLAM: /* Other guys like Windcharger */ new section

2016-07-10T14:11:18Z

Other guys like Windcharger: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 10 July 2016
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Does anyone actually have a number of confirmed casualties vs confirmed survivors? I'd like to know what the ratio is. [[User:Takeshi357\|Takeshi357]] ([[User talk:Takeshi357\|talk]]) 13:16, 2 October 2015 (EDT)		Does anyone actually have a number of confirmed casualties vs confirmed survivors? I'd like to know what the ratio is. [[User:Takeshi357\|Takeshi357]] ([[User talk:Takeshi357\|talk]]) 13:16, 2 October 2015 (EDT)

			== Other guys like Windcharger ==

			This is very specific but could guys like Windcharger be considered dead as a result of this issue as well? I point him out because I noticed that his last appearance was 9 issues before (Totaled), and that he does not appear in the Gen 2, Classics, or Regeneration One comics.


			<<Ignore my name, I was going through a phase 10:11, 10 July 2016 (EDT)

Takeshi357 at 17:16, 2 October 2015

2015-10-02T17:16:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 2 October 2015
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors? --[[User:Jerryteacup\|Jerryteacup]] 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)		Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors? --[[User:Jerryteacup\|Jerryteacup]] 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

			== Bodycount ==

			Does anyone actually have a number of confirmed casualties vs confirmed survivors? I'd like to know what the ratio is. [[User:Takeshi357\|Takeshi357]] ([[User talk:Takeshi357\|talk]]) 13:16, 2 October 2015 (EDT)

Jerryteacup: /* Buster inexplicably needs to explain... */

2015-02-24T16:05:47Z

Buster inexplicably needs to explain...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 24 February 2015
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::Thanks! I'd seen that story, but didn't know it was part of the Marvel continuity (is it?). In any case, thanks for the quick heads up!--[[User:Banjo oz\|Banjo oz]] 06:33, 29 June 2010 (EDT)		::Thanks! I'd seen that story, but didn't know it was part of the Marvel continuity (is it?). In any case, thanks for the quick heads up!--[[User:Banjo oz\|Banjo oz]] 06:33, 29 June 2010 (EDT)

	== Buster inexplicably ~~needs to~~ explain~~...~~ ==		== Buster does not inexplicably explain anything ==

	This is in the Continuity errors section:		This is in the Continuity errors section:

Jerryteacup: /* Buster inexplicably needs to explain... */

2015-02-24T16:01:38Z

Buster inexplicably needs to explain...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 24 February 2015
Line 25:		Line 25:
	I don't find anything inexplicable there. Buster doesn't re-explain anything. Every Decepticon present knows by now that Team Ratbat vs Team Scorponok was just a diversion so Starscream could sneak into Scorponok's ship. The Autobots merely know that they have walked into some sort of a trap.		I don't find anything inexplicable there. Buster doesn't re-explain anything. Every Decepticon present knows by now that Team Ratbat vs Team Scorponok was just a diversion so Starscream could sneak into Scorponok's ship. The Autobots merely know that they have walked into some sort of a trap.

	The only one present who knows the entire magnitude of Starscream's diversion is Buster! Until seeing him Ratbat has little chance of connecting the dots on his own. The logical creature he is, Ratbat could perhaps feel insulted that he didn't put the pieces together himself upon seeing Buster and that a mere fleshling had to break it to him that he has been fooled TWICE!		The only one present who knows the entire magnitude of Starscream's diversion is Buster! Until seeing him Ratbat has little chance of connecting the dots on his own. The logical creature he is, Ratbat could perhaps feel insulted that he didn't put the pieces together himself upon seeing Buster and that a mere fleshling had to break it to him that he has been fooled TWICE! (You gotta commend Starscream for this whole double-whammy.)

	Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors? --[[User:Jerryteacup\|Jerryteacup]] 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)		Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors? --[[User:Jerryteacup\|Jerryteacup]] 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Jerryteacup: /* Buster inexplicably needs to explain... */

2015-02-24T16:00:40Z

Buster inexplicably needs to explain...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 24 February 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	The only one present who knows the entire magnitude of Starscream's diversion is Buster! Until seeing him Ratbat has little chance of connecting the dots on his own. The logical creature he is, Ratbat could perhaps feel insulted that he didn't put the pieces together himself upon seeing Buster and that a mere fleshling had to break it to him that he has been fooled TWICE!		The only one present who knows the entire magnitude of Starscream's diversion is Buster! Until seeing him Ratbat has little chance of connecting the dots on his own. The logical creature he is, Ratbat could perhaps feel insulted that he didn't put the pieces together himself upon seeing Buster and that a mere fleshling had to break it to him that he has been fooled TWICE!

	Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors? [[User:Jerryteacup\|Jerryteacup]] 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)		Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors? --[[User:Jerryteacup\|Jerryteacup]] 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Jerryteacup: /* Buster inexplicably needs to explain... */

2015-02-24T16:00:06Z

Buster inexplicably needs to explain...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 24 February 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	The only one present who knows the entire magnitude of Starscream's diversion is Buster! Until seeing him Ratbat has little chance of connecting the dots on his own. The logical creature he is, Ratbat could perhaps feel insulted that he didn't put the pieces together himself upon seeing Buster and that a mere fleshling had to break it to him that he has been fooled TWICE!		The only one present who knows the entire magnitude of Starscream's diversion is Buster! Until seeing him Ratbat has little chance of connecting the dots on his own. The logical creature he is, Ratbat could perhaps feel insulted that he didn't put the pieces together himself upon seeing Buster and that a mere fleshling had to break it to him that he has been fooled TWICE!

	Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors?		Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors? [[User:Jerryteacup\|Jerryteacup]] 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Jerryteacup: /* Buster inexplicably needs to explain... */ new section

2015-02-24T15:59:49Z

Buster inexplicably needs to explain...: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 24 February 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:[[Games of Deception]] --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 11:55, 28 June 2010 (EDT)		:[[Games of Deception]] --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 11:55, 28 June 2010 (EDT)
	::Thanks! I'd seen that story, but didn't know it was part of the Marvel continuity (is it?). In any case, thanks for the quick heads up!--[[User:Banjo oz\|Banjo oz]] 06:33, 29 June 2010 (EDT)		::Thanks! I'd seen that story, but didn't know it was part of the Marvel continuity (is it?). In any case, thanks for the quick heads up!--[[User:Banjo oz\|Banjo oz]] 06:33, 29 June 2010 (EDT)

			== Buster inexplicably needs to explain... ==

			This is in the Continuity errors section:

			*''Ratbat and Scorponok figure out that Starscream stole the spacecraft to go after the Underbase... and then Buster inexplicably needs to explain it to Ratbat all over again a few pages later. (The only new information Buster gives him is that Starscream arranged for the Autobots to show up.)''

			I don't find anything inexplicable there. Buster doesn't re-explain anything. Every Decepticon present knows by now that Team Ratbat vs Team Scorponok was just a diversion so Starscream could sneak into Scorponok's ship. The Autobots merely know that they have walked into some sort of a trap.

			The only one present who knows the entire magnitude of Starscream's diversion is Buster! Until seeing him Ratbat has little chance of connecting the dots on his own. The logical creature he is, Ratbat could perhaps feel insulted that he didn't put the pieces together himself upon seeing Buster and that a mere fleshling had to break it to him that he has been fooled TWICE!

			Anyone agree that this bit could be removed from the Continuity errors?

Abates: Talk:Dark Star (issue) moved to Talk:Dark Star

2011-09-12T01:30:24Z

Talk:Dark Star (issue) moved to Talk:Dark Star

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:30, 12 September 2011
(No difference)