Talk:Dawn of Future's Past - Revision history

Saix at 18:32, 17 August 2015

2015-08-17T18:32:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 17 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In the list of featured characters, Headstrong (13), Rampage (14), and Tantrum (16) link to their G1 selves. If these are actually their decendants, should they get their own pages?		In the list of featured characters, Headstrong (13), Rampage (14), and Tantrum (16) link to their G1 selves. If these are actually their decendants, should they get their own pages?
	: Maybe? It's hard to say. I mean, I guess I would be inclined, but this might be one of those [[author intent]] things, like what keeps [[Longhorn (Universe)]] from being on [[Ramulus]]'s page. They look like the actual Predacons upon which they are based, and the story itself doesn't say that they're different guys. So, uh. Further discussion is warranted, I believe. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:24, 14 January 2010 (EST)		: Maybe? It's hard to say. I mean, I guess I would be inclined, but this might be one of those [[author intent]] things, like what keeps [[Ramulus\|Longhorn (Universe)]] from being on [[Ramulus]]'s page. They look like the actual Predacons upon which they are based, and the story itself doesn't say that they're different guys. So, uh. Further discussion is warranted, I believe. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:24, 14 January 2010 (EST)

	== Beast Wars Vehicle Altmodes ==		== Beast Wars Vehicle Altmodes ==

Abates: /* Predacons */

2014-09-22T09:04:44Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 22 September 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)		Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong (G1)\|Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum (G1)\|Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at <nowiki>[[Predacon (DOFP)]]</nowiki> or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at <nowiki>[[Predacon (DOFP)]]</nowiki> or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)

SanityOrMadness: /* Predacons */

2014-05-09T20:57:30Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 9 May 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)		Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at <nowiki>[[Predacon (DOFP)]]</nowiki> or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)		::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)

Monzo at 12:37, 6 February 2012

2012-02-06T12:37:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 6 February 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)		::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)

			==Color Credits==
			Drew Eiden: "For the record, I flatted and colored: pages 1-10. I flatted pages 11-15, 17, 20, 23 and 24." http://dreweiden.deviantart.com/gallery/3688392#/dompq1 --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 07:37, 6 February 2012 (EST)

Interrobang: /* Predacons */

2011-11-13T20:49:39Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 13 November 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	::From inference, those guys are obviously the Predacons in the post-Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)		::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)

Interrobang: /* Predacons */

2011-11-13T20:49:07Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 13 November 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)
			::From inference, those guys are obviously the Predacons in the post-Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Predacons */

2011-11-13T20:39:08Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 13 November 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
			:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Predacons */

2011-11-13T20:25:54Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 13 November 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)		Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Predacons */

2011-11-13T20:24:58Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 13 November 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)		Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
			I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Predacons */

2011-11-13T20:13:13Z

Predacons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 13 November 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)		Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)
			:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 22 September 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)		Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong (G1)\|Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum (G1)\|Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at <nowiki>[[Predacon (DOFP)]]</nowiki> or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at <nowiki>[[Predacon (DOFP)]]</nowiki> or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 9 May 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)		Why does this page list Tantrum, Headstrong and Rampage as being in the book when we say right underneath that it's not actually them? Either one is essentially author intent, since they're not identified. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:01, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at <nowiki>[[Predacon (DOFP)]]</nowiki> or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)		::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 13 November 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	::From inference, those guys are obviously the Predacons in the post-Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)		::From inference, those guys are obviously the G1 Predacons in the post-Beast Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 13 November 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)
			::From inference, those guys are obviously the Predacons in the post-Machines era. Pete Sinclair, however, overcomplicated it by saying that everybody but Razorclaw and Divebomb were new guys who look like the old Predacons. (And it seems increasingly likely we're never going back to this plot thread.) I'm of the opinion that those appearances should be noted on the G1 character pages, with a reference containing Pete's comments. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 15:49, 13 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 13 November 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)		:More weirdness: [[Headstrong]] and [[Tantrum]]'s pages say that it ''is'' them, in reformatted technorganic bodies ([[Rampage (G1)\|Rampage]]'s page doesn't mention this issue at all). --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:13, 13 November 2011 (EST)
	I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)		I imagine nobody really wants to touch that murky issue, which is why each page is such a weird hodgepodge of whatever. Frankly, if three of them are relatives and not the original guys, there's no guarantee their names are even Rampage, Headstrong, and Tantrum. One solution would be to make a page for all three at [[Predacon (DOFP)]] or something. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:24, 13 November 2011 (EST)
			:What was actually on the page, what was revealed as author intent, and what is supposition? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:39, 13 November 2011 (EST)