Talk:Dead End (WFC) - Revision history

Derik: Talk:Dead End (Prime) moved to Talk:Dead End (WFC) over redirect: I'm just moving this one without a debate for consensus because-- COME ON.

2012-12-14T08:49:23Z

Talk:Dead End (Prime) moved to Talk:Dead End (WFC) over redirect: I'm just moving this one without a debate for consensus because-- COME ON.

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:49, 14 December 2012
(No difference)

Khajidha: /* New Bio information */

2012-06-02T16:52:43Z

New Bio information

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 2 June 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Hey guys, in-hand photos of the toy and package have popped up on a few sites (specifically, TFW2005), with his (toy) bio fully legible. I forget, what's our standards and practices on when it's acceptable to add this information to the wiki page? Is this stuff considered 'leaked' info? Can it be added, or do we still have to wait for the toy to hit shelves? --[[User:Boy Blunderous\|Boy Blunderous]] 01:18, 30 May 2012 (EDT)		Hey guys, in-hand photos of the toy and package have popped up on a few sites (specifically, TFW2005), with his (toy) bio fully legible. I forget, what's our standards and practices on when it's acceptable to add this information to the wiki page? Is this stuff considered 'leaked' info? Can it be added, or do we still have to wait for the toy to hit shelves? --[[User:Boy Blunderous\|Boy Blunderous]] 01:18, 30 May 2012 (EDT)
	:Seems that way, since my edit with that info was undone. --[[Special:Contributions/189.6.85.254\|189.6.85.254]] 12:48, 2 June 2012 (EDT)		:Seems that way, since my edit with that info was undone. --[[Special:Contributions/189.6.85.254\|189.6.85.254]] 12:48, 2 June 2012 (EDT)
			::Considering that there is no legal way for the individuals to have acquired these "in-hand" items they must be stolen and are thus ineligible for inclusion here. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:52, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

189.6.85.254 at 16:48, 2 June 2012

2012-06-02T16:48:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 2 June 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Hey guys, in-hand photos of the toy and package have popped up on a few sites (specifically, TFW2005), with his (toy) bio fully legible. I forget, what's our standards and practices on when it's acceptable to add this information to the wiki page? Is this stuff considered 'leaked' info? Can it be added, or do we still have to wait for the toy to hit shelves? --[[User:Boy Blunderous\|Boy Blunderous]] 01:18, 30 May 2012 (EDT)		Hey guys, in-hand photos of the toy and package have popped up on a few sites (specifically, TFW2005), with his (toy) bio fully legible. I forget, what's our standards and practices on when it's acceptable to add this information to the wiki page? Is this stuff considered 'leaked' info? Can it be added, or do we still have to wait for the toy to hit shelves? --[[User:Boy Blunderous\|Boy Blunderous]] 01:18, 30 May 2012 (EDT)
			:Seems that way, since my edit with that info was undone. --[[Special:Contributions/189.6.85.254\|189.6.85.254]] 12:48, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Boy Blunderous at 05:18, 30 May 2012

2012-05-30T05:18:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 30 May 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::::::::Further discussion in [[Transformers Wiki talk:Community Portal#Redirects with parentheses\|Community Portal]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:12, 18 November 2010 (EST)		::::::::Further discussion in [[Transformers Wiki talk:Community Portal#Redirects with parentheses\|Community Portal]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:12, 18 November 2010 (EST)

			==New Bio information==

			Hey guys, in-hand photos of the toy and package have popped up on a few sites (specifically, TFW2005), with his (toy) bio fully legible. I forget, what's our standards and practices on when it's acceptable to add this information to the wiki page? Is this stuff considered 'leaked' info? Can it be added, or do we still have to wait for the toy to hit shelves? --[[User:Boy Blunderous\|Boy Blunderous]] 01:18, 30 May 2012 (EDT)

Interrobang: Talk:Dead End (WFC) moved to Talk:Dead End (Prime)

2012-02-02T17:04:15Z

Talk:Dead End (WFC) moved to Talk:Dead End (Prime)

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:04, 2 February 2012
(No difference)

Alientraveller: Talk:Dead End (Prime) moved to Talk:Dead End (WFC)

2011-03-05T19:03:58Z

Talk:Dead End (Prime) moved to Talk:Dead End (WFC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:03, 5 March 2011
(No difference)

Starfield at 17:12, 18 November 2010

2010-11-18T17:12:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 18 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			::::::::Further discussion in [[Transformers Wiki talk:Community Portal#Redirects with parentheses\|Community Portal]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:12, 18 November 2010 (EST)

Khajidha at 14:10, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T14:10:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 17 November 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)

Interrobang at 14:05, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T14:05:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 17 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:"Deadend (Prime)"? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 02:04, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:"Deadend (Prime)"? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 02:04, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::No, Blackout. Delete "Deadend" and move this there. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:12, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::No, Blackout. Delete "Deadend" and move this there. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:12, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	:::Wouldn't [[Deadend (Movie)]] need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like [[Dead End (Movie)]] already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be [[Deadend (Prime)]]. [[Deadend]] would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::Wouldn't "Deadend (Movie)" need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like "Dead End (Movie)" already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be "Deadend (Prime)". "Deadend" would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)

Khajidha at 13:51, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T13:51:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 17 November 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Wouldn't [[Deadend (Movie)]] need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like [[Dead End (Movie)]] already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be [[Deadend (Prime)]]. [[Deadend]] would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::Wouldn't [[Deadend (Movie)]] need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like [[Dead End (Movie)]] already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be [[Deadend (Prime)]]. [[Deadend]] would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 2 June 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Hey guys, in-hand photos of the toy and package have popped up on a few sites (specifically, TFW2005), with his (toy) bio fully legible. I forget, what's our standards and practices on when it's acceptable to add this information to the wiki page? Is this stuff considered 'leaked' info? Can it be added, or do we still have to wait for the toy to hit shelves? --[[User:Boy Blunderous\|Boy Blunderous]] 01:18, 30 May 2012 (EDT)		Hey guys, in-hand photos of the toy and package have popped up on a few sites (specifically, TFW2005), with his (toy) bio fully legible. I forget, what's our standards and practices on when it's acceptable to add this information to the wiki page? Is this stuff considered 'leaked' info? Can it be added, or do we still have to wait for the toy to hit shelves? --[[User:Boy Blunderous\|Boy Blunderous]] 01:18, 30 May 2012 (EDT)
	:Seems that way, since my edit with that info was undone. --[[Special:Contributions/189.6.85.254\|189.6.85.254]] 12:48, 2 June 2012 (EDT)		:Seems that way, since my edit with that info was undone. --[[Special:Contributions/189.6.85.254\|189.6.85.254]] 12:48, 2 June 2012 (EDT)
			::Considering that there is no legal way for the individuals to have acquired these "in-hand" items they must be stolen and are thus ineligible for inclusion here. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:52, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 18 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			::::::::Further discussion in [[Transformers Wiki talk:Community Portal#Redirects with parentheses\|Community Portal]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:12, 18 November 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 17 November 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			:::::::My point is that by the rules currently in place the redirects I mentioned should exist. Your main point is that such redirects should not exist because readers won't use them. If we are to debate that premise, this needs to go somewhere besides an individual article. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:10, 17 November 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 17 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:"Deadend (Prime)"? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 02:04, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:"Deadend (Prime)"? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 02:04, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::No, Blackout. Delete "Deadend" and move this there. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:12, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::No, Blackout. Delete "Deadend" and move this there. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:12, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	:::Wouldn't [[Deadend (Movie)]] need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like [[Dead End (Movie)]] already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be [[Deadend (Prime)]]. [[Deadend]] would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::Wouldn't "Deadend (Movie)" need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like "Dead End (Movie)" already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be "Deadend (Prime)". "Deadend" would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			::::::We have a pop-down list of links for the search box now, you know. Redirects clutter it and push off actual pages. Never mind the fact that you didn't respond to my main point or the sheer improbability of somebody typing in "Deadend (Movie)" based on a bit character in a ROTF novel. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 09:05, 17 November 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 17 November 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Wouldn't [[Deadend (Movie)]] need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like [[Dead End (Movie)]] already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be [[Deadend (Prime)]]. [[Deadend]] would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)		:::Wouldn't [[Deadend (Movie)]] need to be created to redirect to Jolt, just like [[Dead End (Movie)]] already does because both are official names for that character? This would then have to be [[Deadend (Prime)]]. [[Deadend]] would probably redirect to this character by rule of prominence. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:26, 17 November 2010 (EST)
	::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)		::::There is no point whatsoever to doing that. There's no actual name conflict, because the two pages are going to have different names either way. (Redirects with parentheses are fucking stupid, because readers are not going to type them in.) [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 08:47, 17 November 2010 (EST)
			:::::Didn't the debate go against you on this point on [[Talk: Jolt (Movie)]]? From what I've seen redirects with parentheses ARE used, which is why I brought up the ones I did. If you think they SHOULDN'T be, we need to enlarge this discussion. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:51, 17 November 2010 (EST)