Talk:Decepticon detector - Revision history

Takeshi357 at 07:15, 7 July 2015

2015-07-07T07:15:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:15, 7 July 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:

	My take on this though... There may not be an physical device called the Decepticon detector, but Ironhide and Red Alert both have proven they have the ability to detect Decepticons. [[User:Sarpiedon\|Sarpiedon]] 15:24, 1 February 2013 (EST)		My take on this though... There may not be an physical device called the Decepticon detector, but Ironhide and Red Alert both have proven they have the ability to detect Decepticons. [[User:Sarpiedon\|Sarpiedon]] 15:24, 1 February 2013 (EST)

			:[[The New_Warrior - Hellbat\|And then they went ahead and actually built one.]] (I still think it was dumb.) [[User:Takeshi357\|Takeshi357]] ([[User talk:Takeshi357\|talk]]) 03:15, 7 July 2015 (EDT)

Sarpiedon at 20:24, 1 February 2013

2013-02-01T20:24:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 1 February 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::I actually think the Poirot reference is a tad obvious (well, not ''obvious'', but it's not funny, it's merely saying 'this operates on the same mechanism as a well-known mystery story.') The weak 'letter opener' gag isn't worth it. Keep yours. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 04:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		::I actually think the Poirot reference is a tad obvious (well, not ''obvious'', but it's not funny, it's merely saying 'this operates on the same mechanism as a well-known mystery story.') The weak 'letter opener' gag isn't worth it. Keep yours. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 04:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

			My take on this though... There may not be an physical device called the Decepticon detector, but Ironhide and Red Alert both have proven they have the ability to detect Decepticons. [[User:Sarpiedon\|Sarpiedon]] 15:24, 1 February 2013 (EST)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-26T13:59:13Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 26 March 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Heh. Okay, I get it now. I like mine just enough not to change it back, but if somebody else thinks the Poirot ref is better and reverts it, then that's cool. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		:Heh. Okay, I get it now. I like mine just enough not to change it back, but if somebody else thinks the Poirot ref is better and reverts it, then that's cool. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

	::I actually think the Poirot reference is a tad obvious (well, not ''obvious'', but it's not funny, it's merely saying 'this operates on the same mechanism as a well-known mystery story.') The weak 'letter opener' gag isn't worth it. Keep yours. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 04:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		::I actually think the Poirot reference is a tad obvious (well, not ''obvious'', but it's not funny, it's merely saying 'this operates on the same mechanism as a well-known mystery story.') The weak 'letter opener' gag isn't worth it. Keep yours. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 04:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Derik at 04:56, 8 June 2007

2007-06-08T04:56:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 8 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)		Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

	:Heh. Okay, I get it now. I like mine just enough not to change it back, but if somebody else thinks the Poirot ref is better and reverts it, then that's cool. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:Heh. Okay, I get it now. I like mine just enough not to change it back, but if somebody else thinks the Poirot ref is better and reverts it, then that's cool. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

			::I actually think the Poirot reference is a tad obvious (well, not ''obvious'', but it's not funny, it's merely saying 'this operates on the same mechanism as a well-known mystery story.') The weak 'letter opener' gag isn't worth it. Keep yours. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 04:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Jackpot at 04:28, 8 June 2007

2007-06-08T04:28:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 8 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

			:Heh. Okay, I get it now. I like mine just enough not to change it back, but if somebody else thinks the Poirot ref is better and reverts it, then that's cool. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Derik: New page: Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked...

2007-06-07T06:57:03Z

New page: Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked...

New page

Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>