Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF) - Revision history

Abates: Abates moved page Talk:Depthcharge to Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF)

2016-12-30T07:52:09Z

Abates moved page Talk:Depthcharge to Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF)

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:52, 30 December 2016
(No difference)

LV at 15:04, 30 March 2011

2011-03-30T15:04:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 30 March 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
	::The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--[[User:Tristan 38935\|Tristan 38935]] 10:59, 11 April (EDT)		::The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--[[User:Tristan 38935\|Tristan 38935]] 10:59, 11 April (EDT)

			Actually, I think his toy is probably based on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_class_littoral_combat_ship ''Freedom'' class], but this is a more substantial change than dropping the inaccurate ''Visby'' note. Thoughts? -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:04, 30 March 2011 (EDT)

	== Move to Depthcharge (ROTF) ==		== Move to Depthcharge (ROTF) ==

Rosicrucian: Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF) moved to Talk:Depthcharge

2010-12-11T21:28:30Z

Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF) moved to Talk:Depthcharge

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:28, 11 December 2010
(No difference)

Interrobang at 23:08, 27 June 2010

2010-06-27T23:08:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 27 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Caption==		==Caption==
	(Reply and explain to the edit summary in the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&action=history history page].)		(Reply and explain to the edit summary in the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&action=history history page].)
	I use the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&diff=302827&oldid=302826 caption] is a ''ROTF''-reference ~~{{m-}}~~ the scene in which the US aircraft carrier gets hit and destroyed by the Decepticon Protoform meteorites. Because I don't have the screencap of the scene, I use <nowiki>[[Protoform\|meteorite]]</nowiki> instead. :) --'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:19, 31 May 2009 (EDT)		I use the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&diff=302827&oldid=302826 caption] is a ''ROTF''-reference — the scene in which the US aircraft carrier gets hit and destroyed by the Decepticon Protoform meteorites. Because I don't have the screencap of the scene, I use <nowiki>[[Protoform\|meteorite]]</nowiki> instead. :) --'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:19, 31 May 2009 (EDT)

	:There's not that much of a connection. The transition didn't hit whatever type of ship Depthcharge transforms into. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:33, 31 May 2009 (EDT)		:There's not that much of a connection. The transition didn't hit whatever type of ship Depthcharge transforms into. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:33, 31 May 2009 (EDT)

Item42: Talk:Depthcharge moved to Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF): This character is not the only Depthcharge without a space in the midddle

2010-06-12T09:08:36Z

Talk:Depthcharge moved to Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF): This character is not the only Depthcharge without a space in the midddle

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:08, 12 June 2010
(No difference)

-Blackout-: /* Move to Depthcharge (ROTF) */

2010-06-12T08:53:38Z

Move to Depthcharge (ROTF)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:53, 12 June 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I agree with that suggestion, he's not the only "Depthcharge without a space in the middle". I guess I can move it if there's no objection. (Actually have been wanting to move this page for a while.[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:47, 12 June 2010 (EDT)		I agree with that suggestion, he's not the only "Depthcharge without a space in the middle". I guess I can move it if there's no objection. (Actually have been wanting to move this page for a while.[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:47, 12 June 2010 (EDT)
			:Move it. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 04:53, 12 June 2010 (EDT)

Item42: /* Move to Depthcharge (ROTF) */ new section

2010-06-12T08:47:31Z

Move to Depthcharge (ROTF): new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 12 June 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
	::The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--[[User:Tristan 38935\|Tristan 38935]] 10:59, 11 April (EDT)		::The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--[[User:Tristan 38935\|Tristan 38935]] 10:59, 11 April (EDT)

			== Move to Depthcharge (ROTF) ==

			I agree with that suggestion, he's not the only "Depthcharge without a space in the middle". I guess I can move it if there's no objection. (Actually have been wanting to move this page for a while.[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:47, 12 June 2010 (EDT)

Tristan 38935 at 15:01, 11 April 2010

2010-04-11T15:01:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 11 April 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
	::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
			::The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--[[User:Tristan 38935\|Tristan 38935]] 10:59, 11 April (EDT)

MCRG Again: /* Vehicle Type */

2009-06-19T21:40:04Z

Vehicle Type

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 19 June 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
	:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
			::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)

Apcog: /* Vehicle Type */

2009-06-19T17:12:38Z

Vehicle Type

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 19 June 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Vehicle Type==		==Vehicle Type==
	So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
			:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 11 April 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
	::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
			::The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--[[User:Tristan 38935\|Tristan 38935]] 10:59, 11 April (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 19 June 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
	:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)		:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog\|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
			::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again\|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)