Talk:Devastator (G1) - Revision history

Michael Alex Kawa: /* Generation 2 tampographed. */

2016-04-11T12:14:16Z

Generation 2 tampographed.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 11 April 2016
Line 44:		Line 44:
	All six of them have the Tampograph G2 symbol and the word Decepticon, not just Hook and Bonecrusher, trust me I have all six. If you need a pic to prove it let me know. :)		All six of them have the Tampograph G2 symbol and the word Decepticon, not just Hook and Bonecrusher, trust me I have all six. If you need a pic to prove it let me know. :)
	I did not know how else to inform you then written it here, and I did not want to change the page myself cause I would probably mess it up or something.		I did not know how else to inform you then written it here, and I did not want to change the page myself cause I would probably mess it up or something.
			--[[User:Michael Alex Kawa\|Melissa]] ([[User talk:Michael Alex Kawa\|talk]]) 08:14, 11 April 2016 (EDT)

Michael Alex Kawa: /* Generation 2 tampographed. */ new section

2016-04-11T12:13:41Z

Generation 2 tampographed.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 11 April 2016
Line 38:		Line 38:

	In light of recent events... should we treat Devastator's faction any differently? During Dark Cybertron, sure, he's got a giant Decepticon logo on his chest, but 1/6 of him is ardently Autobot. Just curious what, if any, precedent there might be for this situation. [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 16:52, 4 May 2014 (EDT)		In light of recent events... should we treat Devastator's faction any differently? During Dark Cybertron, sure, he's got a giant Decepticon logo on his chest, but 1/6 of him is ardently Autobot. Just curious what, if any, precedent there might be for this situation. [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 16:52, 4 May 2014 (EDT)

			== Generation 2 tampographed. ==

			In your article it says that "only Hook and Bonecrusher featured a Generation 2-style Decepticon logo and the word "DECEPTICON" tampographed on them", and that is wrong.
			All six of them have the Tampograph G2 symbol and the word Decepticon, not just Hook and Bonecrusher, trust me I have all six. If you need a pic to prove it let me know. :)
			I did not know how else to inform you then written it here, and I did not want to change the page myself cause I would probably mess it up or something.

Magaroja: /* IDW Faction */ new section

2014-05-04T20:52:39Z

IDW Faction: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 4 May 2014
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
	::::Sure, but the thing is, we're not required to put quotes at the top of pages. We could not have a quote, actually! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:32, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		::::Sure, but the thing is, we're not required to put quotes at the top of pages. We could not have a quote, actually! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:32, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

			== IDW Faction ==

			In light of recent events... should we treat Devastator's faction any differently? During Dark Cybertron, sure, he's got a giant Decepticon logo on his chest, but 1/6 of him is ardently Autobot. Just curious what, if any, precedent there might be for this situation. [[User:Magaroja\|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja\|talk]]) 16:52, 4 May 2014 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* Quote Change */

2013-07-25T00:32:34Z

Quote Change

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 25 July 2013
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
	:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
			::::Sure, but the thing is, we're not required to put quotes at the top of pages. We could not have a quote, actually! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:32, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

Jalaguy: /* Quote Change */

2013-07-25T00:02:26Z

Quote Change

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 25 July 2013
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
	::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
			:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* Quote Change */

2013-07-24T23:40:29Z

Quote Change

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 24 July 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:
	Would it be more appropriate to put the famous phrase "Constructicons, merge for the kill." as the primary quote. {{unsigned\|Rock76222}}		Would it be more appropriate to put the famous phrase "Constructicons, merge for the kill." as the primary quote. {{unsigned\|Rock76222}}
	:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
			::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

Jalaguy: /* Quote Change */

2013-07-24T23:36:07Z

Quote Change

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 24 July 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== Quote Change ==		== Quote Change ==

	Would it be more appropriate to put the famous phrase "Constructicons, merge for the kill." as the primary quote.		Would it be more appropriate to put the famous phrase "Constructicons, merge for the kill." as the primary quote. {{unsigned\|Rock76222}}
			:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

Rock76222 at 23:26, 24 July 2013

2013-07-24T23:26:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 24 July 2013
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:Eh, if the ''rest'' of the page was big enough that it felt like it was bloating it out I'd say yes, but I think it's fine as is for now. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 08:48, 1 May 2013 (EDT)		:Eh, if the ''rest'' of the page was big enough that it felt like it was bloating it out I'd say yes, but I think it's fine as is for now. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 08:48, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
	:I thought we only split pages if they go over 100K or so. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:39, 1 May 2013 (EDT)		:I thought we only split pages if they go over 100K or so. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:39, 1 May 2013 (EDT)

			== Quote Change ==

			Would it be more appropriate to put the famous phrase "Constructicons, merge for the kill." as the primary quote.

Abates: /* Split? */

2013-05-01T20:39:28Z

Split?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 1 May 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Does it look like Devastator's G1 cartoon continuity could use its own sub-page at this point? --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] 08:31, 1 May 2013 (EDT)		Does it look like Devastator's G1 cartoon continuity could use its own sub-page at this point? --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] 08:31, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
	:Eh, if the ''rest'' of the page was big enough that it felt like it was bloating it out I'd say yes, but I think it's fine as is for now. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 08:48, 1 May 2013 (EDT)		:Eh, if the ''rest'' of the page was big enough that it felt like it was bloating it out I'd say yes, but I think it's fine as is for now. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 08:48, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
			:I thought we only split pages if they go over 100K or so. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:39, 1 May 2013 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* Split? */

2013-05-01T12:48:42Z

Split?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 1 May 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Does it look like Devastator's G1 cartoon continuity could use its own sub-page at this point? --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] 08:31, 1 May 2013 (EDT)		Does it look like Devastator's G1 cartoon continuity could use its own sub-page at this point? --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] 08:31, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
			:Eh, if the ''rest'' of the page was big enough that it felt like it was bloating it out I'd say yes, but I think it's fine as is for now. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 08:48, 1 May 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 25 July 2013
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
	:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
			::::Sure, but the thing is, we're not required to put quotes at the top of pages. We could not have a quote, actually! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:32, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 25 July 2013
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
	::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
			:::Aren't basically all quotes regarding Devastator all going to boil down to "Devastator gives hyperbolic description of own power," "Megatron gives order to Devastator/hyperbolic description of Devastator's power," or "Autobots express fear of Devastator"? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 20:02, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 24 July 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:
	Would it be more appropriate to put the famous phrase "Constructicons, merge for the kill." as the primary quote. {{unsigned\|Rock76222}}		Would it be more appropriate to put the famous phrase "Constructicons, merge for the kill." as the primary quote. {{unsigned\|Rock76222}}
	:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)		:No, not really. That quote might be well known, but it doesn't tell you anything about Devastator other than the fact that he's a combiner. The current one actually shows you something about Devastator's personality. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:36, 24 July 2013 (EDT)
			::Neither of them are particularly useful quotes. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:40, 24 July 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 1 May 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Does it look like Devastator's G1 cartoon continuity could use its own sub-page at this point? --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] 08:31, 1 May 2013 (EDT)		Does it look like Devastator's G1 cartoon continuity could use its own sub-page at this point? --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] 08:31, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
	:Eh, if the ''rest'' of the page was big enough that it felt like it was bloating it out I'd say yes, but I think it's fine as is for now. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 08:48, 1 May 2013 (EDT)		:Eh, if the ''rest'' of the page was big enough that it felt like it was bloating it out I'd say yes, but I think it's fine as is for now. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 08:48, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
			:I thought we only split pages if they go over 100K or so. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:39, 1 May 2013 (EDT)