Talk:Devcon (DOTM) - Revision history

NexusShard17 at 22:39, 9 November 2018

2018-11-09T22:39:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 9 November 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:No. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 17:46, 4 October 2011 (EDT)		:No. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 17:46, 4 October 2011 (EDT)

	:Yes, but only if it's as blatantly fake and usefully descriptive as [[Christmas Maximus]]. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 03:04, 5 October 2011 (EDT)		:Yes, but only if it's as blatantly fake and usefully descriptive as [[Peritus Maximus\|Christmas Maximus]]. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 03:04, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
	:Dammit, we're not calling this guy Cloverjolt. Just give it up.--[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 10:58, 5 October 2011 (EDT)		:Dammit, we're not calling this guy Cloverjolt. Just give it up.--[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 10:58, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
	::Not necessarily Cloverjolt (though I personally find that name quite awesome due to the fact that this guy is in many ways the Jolt of ''DOTM'', and I actually think it sounds like it could be accepted as his official name), but perhaps "Cloverfield Decepticon" (Unless "Clovercon" catches on very fast) at this point. "Long-legged Decepticon" really just sounds ''awful'' and unimaginative to me, to the point of ''actually taking something away from the article''. That's probably just me, though. - [[User:Queso\|¡Usa El Queso!]] <sup>[[User talk:Queso\|Complain here]]</sup> 20:22, 18 October 2011 (EDT)		::Not necessarily Cloverjolt (though I personally find that name quite awesome due to the fact that this guy is in many ways the Jolt of ''DOTM'', and I actually think it sounds like it could be accepted as his official name), but perhaps "Cloverfield Decepticon" (Unless "Clovercon" catches on very fast) at this point. "Long-legged Decepticon" really just sounds ''awful'' and unimaginative to me, to the point of ''actually taking something away from the article''. That's probably just me, though. - [[User:Queso\|¡Usa El Queso!]] <sup>[[User talk:Queso\|Complain here]]</sup> 20:22, 18 October 2011 (EDT)

Shockwave1704: /* Devcon */

2012-04-18T18:23:51Z

Devcon

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 18 April 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)		Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)
	[[~~File~~:Devcon(dotm).jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[Image:Devcon (dotm).jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]

Shockwave1704: /* Devcon */

2012-04-18T18:22:41Z

Devcon

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 18 April 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)		Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)
	[[File: Devcon(dotm).jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[File:Devcon(dotm).jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]

Shockwave1704: /* Devcon */

2012-04-18T18:22:30Z

Devcon

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 18 April 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)		Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)
	~~File~~[[Devcon (dotm).jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]		[[File: Devcon(dotm).jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]

Shockwave1704: /* Devcon */

2012-04-18T18:21:48Z

Devcon

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 18 April 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)		Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)
			File[[Devcon (dotm).jpg\|thumb\|250px\|]]

Shockwave1704: /* Devcon */ new section

2012-04-18T18:19:57Z

Devcon: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 18 April 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:::True. I don't have any strong objection to calling him Devcon for lack of a better name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:18, 30 January 2012 (EST)		:::True. I don't have any strong objection to calling him Devcon for lack of a better name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:18, 30 January 2012 (EST)
	::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)		::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)

			== Devcon ==

			Hello Can I add this photo in Devcon's page?--[[User:Shockwave1704\|Shockwave1704]] 14:19, 18 April 2012 (EDT)

Abates: /* Concept art */

2012-01-31T02:18:24Z

Concept art

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 31 January 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)		:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)
	::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)		::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)
			:::True. I don't have any strong objection to calling him Devcon for lack of a better name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:18, 30 January 2012 (EST)
	::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)		::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)

Interrobang: Talk:Long-legged Decepticon moved to Talk:Devcon (DOTM)

2012-01-31T02:15:42Z

Talk:Long-legged Decepticon moved to Talk:Devcon (DOTM)

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:15, 31 January 2012
(No difference)

24.69.64.254: /* Concept art */

2012-01-31T01:26:33Z

Concept art

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 31 January 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)		:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)
	::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)		::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)
			::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)

Carrion: /* Concept art */

2012-01-29T19:49:08Z

Concept art

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 29 January 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[User:SlamBolt\|Danny LeFox]] 12:32, 29 January 2012 (EST)		[[User:SlamBolt\|Danny LeFox]] 12:32, 29 January 2012 (EST)
	:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)		:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)
			::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 9 November 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:No. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 17:46, 4 October 2011 (EDT)		:No. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 17:46, 4 October 2011 (EDT)

	:Yes, but only if it's as blatantly fake and usefully descriptive as [[Christmas Maximus]]. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 03:04, 5 October 2011 (EDT)		:Yes, but only if it's as blatantly fake and usefully descriptive as [[Peritus Maximus\|Christmas Maximus]]. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 03:04, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
	:Dammit, we're not calling this guy Cloverjolt. Just give it up.--[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 10:58, 5 October 2011 (EDT)		:Dammit, we're not calling this guy Cloverjolt. Just give it up.--[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 10:58, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
	::Not necessarily Cloverjolt (though I personally find that name quite awesome due to the fact that this guy is in many ways the Jolt of ''DOTM'', and I actually think it sounds like it could be accepted as his official name), but perhaps "Cloverfield Decepticon" (Unless "Clovercon" catches on very fast) at this point. "Long-legged Decepticon" really just sounds ''awful'' and unimaginative to me, to the point of ''actually taking something away from the article''. That's probably just me, though. - [[User:Queso\|¡Usa El Queso!]] <sup>[[User talk:Queso\|Complain here]]</sup> 20:22, 18 October 2011 (EDT)		::Not necessarily Cloverjolt (though I personally find that name quite awesome due to the fact that this guy is in many ways the Jolt of ''DOTM'', and I actually think it sounds like it could be accepted as his official name), but perhaps "Cloverfield Decepticon" (Unless "Clovercon" catches on very fast) at this point. "Long-legged Decepticon" really just sounds ''awful'' and unimaginative to me, to the point of ''actually taking something away from the article''. That's probably just me, though. - [[User:Queso\|¡Usa El Queso!]] <sup>[[User talk:Queso\|Complain here]]</sup> 20:22, 18 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 31 January 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)		:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)
	::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)		::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)
			:::True. I don't have any strong objection to calling him Devcon for lack of a better name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 21:18, 30 January 2012 (EST)
	::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)		::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 31 January 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)		:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)
	::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)		::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)
			::Come on guys, let's give the poor fellow a name. There is no other movie character named Devcon.--[[Special:Contributions/24.69.64.254\|24.69.64.254]] 20:26, 30 January 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 29 January 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[User:SlamBolt\|Danny LeFox]] 12:32, 29 January 2012 (EST)		[[User:SlamBolt\|Danny LeFox]] 12:32, 29 January 2012 (EST)
	:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)		:Nice find! I don't know if it's enough to make him "Devcon (DOTM)", since some of the other DOTM concept art uses names that are obviously wrong. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 14:38, 29 January 2012 (EST)
			::Lack of any other name to call him kinda makes the "call it this so anyone who steals the art is confused" name as official as it gets. --[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 14:49, 29 January 2012 (EST)