Talk:Devisiun (planet) - Revision history

Locoman: Grum moved page Talk:Devisiun to Talk:Devisiun (planet)

2018-11-16T00:10:53Z

Grum moved page Talk:Devisiun to Talk:Devisiun (planet)

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:10, 16 November 2018
(No difference)

Saix: /* Planet and Titan articles */ new section

2018-11-14T12:57:07Z

Planet and Titan articles: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 14 November 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I leave this here for the sake of encyclopedic accuracy. While we might not know the answers for years to come, at least I will not have stood for ignorance as an excuse. If anyone can confirm the Binary Star System status, please feel free to put an end to the current ambiguity. [[User:Xunk16\|Xunk16]] ([[User talk:Xunk16\|talk]]) 04:02, 24 April 2016 (EDT)		I leave this here for the sake of encyclopedic accuracy. While we might not know the answers for years to come, at least I will not have stood for ignorance as an excuse. If anyone can confirm the Binary Star System status, please feel free to put an end to the current ambiguity. [[User:Xunk16\|Xunk16]] ([[User talk:Xunk16\|talk]]) 04:02, 24 April 2016 (EDT)
	:... I think that probably the easiest explanation is that we're viewing the planet from an angle where one of the suns is behind the other one. That said, this is a very minor error that you're taking a ''bit'' too seriously. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:54, 24 April 2016 (EDT)		:... I think that probably the easiest explanation is that we're viewing the planet from an angle where one of the suns is behind the other one. That said, this is a very minor error that you're taking a ''bit'' too seriously. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:54, 24 April 2016 (EDT)

			== Planet and Titan articles ==

			Do we merge the two or keep them split? (Imma be cheeky and say that the Titan gets the "Divisiun" spelling, since it's the only name it got.) [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 07:57, 14 November 2018 (EST)

Locoman at 12:54, 24 April 2016

2016-04-24T12:54:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 24 April 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I leave this here for the sake of encyclopedic accuracy. While we might not know the answers for years to come, at least I will not have stood for ignorance as an excuse. If anyone can confirm the Binary Star System status, please feel free to put an end to the current ambiguity. [[User:Xunk16\|Xunk16]] ([[User talk:Xunk16\|talk]]) 04:02, 24 April 2016 (EDT)		I leave this here for the sake of encyclopedic accuracy. While we might not know the answers for years to come, at least I will not have stood for ignorance as an excuse. If anyone can confirm the Binary Star System status, please feel free to put an end to the current ambiguity. [[User:Xunk16\|Xunk16]] ([[User talk:Xunk16\|talk]]) 04:02, 24 April 2016 (EDT)
			:... I think that probably the easiest explanation is that we're viewing the planet from an angle where one of the suns is behind the other one. That said, this is a very minor error that you're taking a ''bit'' too seriously. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:54, 24 April 2016 (EDT)

Xunk16: Created page with "== Status as a binary system == Some people might consider that it is more accurate to write the article as if a coloration error was the most credible theory about what is h..."

2016-04-24T08:02:03Z

Created page with "== Status as a binary system == Some people might consider that it is more accurate to write the article as if a coloration error was the most credible theory about what is h..."

New page

== Status as a binary system ==

Some people might consider that it is more accurate to write the article as if a coloration error was the most credible theory about what is happening in the picture of Devisiun. However, the fact remain that there is more than one possibility for it to be accurate. I have tried to forget this and move on, but I can't. A few months ago I was told to try and confirm one of these possibility on Twitter, but so far, there is no news. While the coloration "error" angle offer that the big cybertronian thingy is the planet, the glowy yellow dot a star and the dark spot a moon, here is some other solid theories of what may be happening between the statement of "binary star system" and the representation of it :

1 - The Dyson Sphere : The second star is in fact be the big cybertronian object at the centre. A Dyson sphere is an energy plant designed to encase a star and recuperate most, if not all, of it's lost energy. Considering the recurring theme of the energy crisis in Transformer fiction, this certainly seems appropriate for an autonomous colony. In this case, Devisiun could be the darker object on the right, or the star itself. (Also, living on a star casing could certainly be more coherent with gravitation provoking spark mutations).

2 - One of the stars is a Brown Dwarf : A Brown Dwarf, while being a star, is just a little bigger than a gas or ice giant. It produces a lot of heat, but not so much in terms of light. This theory supports the idea that the two smaller objects (in perspective) are indeed stars. Devisiun being the cybertronian object at the center.

3 - Instead of a coloration "error", the star might well be off panel. Sure, this feels kind of weird, but it is possible artistic licence nonetheless.

I leave this here for the sake of encyclopedic accuracy. While we might not know the answers for years to come, at least I will not have stood for ignorance as an excuse. If anyone can confirm the Binary Star System status, please feel free to put an end to the current ambiguity. [[User:Xunk16|Xunk16]] ([[User talk:Xunk16|talk]]) 04:02, 24 April 2016 (EDT)