Talk:Dile - Revision history

BerylRoll: /* Huh? */

2026-01-09T08:35:40Z

Huh?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 9 January 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	===Huh?===		===Huh?===
	Wait, given the whole thing about the Chinese MMO names, shouldn't this be at "Diaru" per the "straight romanisation" thing? - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 17:23, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		Wait, given the whole thing about the Chinese MMO names, shouldn't this be at "Diaru" per the "straight romanisation" thing? - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 17:23, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
	:The Chinese names were in Chinese, so we put them up in Chinese. This is a case of an English word being written out in Japanese characters (as is the case with nearly all Japanese Transformers names), so we go use the word that it's actually supposed to be, rather than a mangled in-betweener. It's why Minerva isn't at "Mineruba", or Lio Conoy isn't at "Rio Konboi." Compare it with [[Suiken]] or [[Yukikaze]], where their name actually IS a Japanese word, so we use that word. [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:15, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		:The Chinese names were in Chinese, so we put them up in Chinese. This is a case of an English word being written out in Japanese characters (as is the case with nearly all Japanese Transformers names), so we go use the word that it's actually supposed to be, rather than a mangled in-betweener. It's why Minerva isn't at "Mineruba", or Lio Conoy isn't at "Rio Konboi." Compare it with Suiken or Yukikaze, where their name actually IS a Japanese word, so we use that word. [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:15, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
	::If that's the idea, then since when is "Dile" an English word? Even if it was written like that, it would be a "Minelba" case, surely. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 20:27, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		::If that's the idea, then since when is "Dile" an English word? Even if it was written like that, it would be a "Minelba" case, surely. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 20:27, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
	:::Short for croco''dile'', as his partner Saur is short of dino''saur''. It's a theme. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:30, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		:::Short for croco''dile'', as his partner Saur is short of dino''saur''. It's a theme. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:30, 25 March 2012 (EDT)

Saix at 18:34, 18 May 2021

2021-05-18T18:34:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 18 May 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	It could be rep'''tile''', with the first syllable voiced, like how Saur's name is pronounced with a voiced consonant. It seems a better guess than associating an ''Iguanodon'' with an animal it's barely related to. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 01:28, 8 May 2015 (EDT)		It could be rep'''tile''', with the first syllable voiced, like how Saur's name is pronounced with a voiced consonant. It seems a better guess than associating an ''Iguanodon'' with an animal it's barely related to. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 01:28, 8 May 2015 (EDT)
	:"Barely related to" is a little much, since they're both archosaurs, but I think your hypothesis certainly makes more sense...that is, if that's a way Japanese works, about which I have no idea. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 02:39, 8 May 2015 (EDT)		:"Barely related to" is a little much, since they're both archosaurs, but I think your hypothesis certainly makes more sense...that is, if that's a way Japanese works, about which I have no idea. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 02:39, 8 May 2015 (EDT)
	::"Reptile" in Japanese transliteration is レプタイル. Ta (タ) is differentiated from da (ダ) by those two lines; messing around with that is a trick that Takara loves, like with [[Gob]] and [[Terrormander]], etc. I might be totally wrong with the namer's intention, but it's something that popped in my head tonight. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 02:50, 8 May 2015 (EDT)		::"Reptile" in Japanese transliteration is レプタイル. Ta (タ) is differentiated from da (ダ) by those two lines; messing around with that is a trick that Takara loves, like with [[Gobu\|Gob]] and [[Terrormander]], etc. I might be totally wrong with the namer's intention, but it's something that popped in my head tonight. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 02:50, 8 May 2015 (EDT)
	:::Should we add this to the page?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 26 November 2016 (EST)		:::Should we add this to the page?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 26 November 2016 (EST)
	::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)		::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Random thought */

2018-08-18T21:16:18Z

Random thought

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 18 August 2018
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:I guess, but we have Trypticon's and Terrorsaur's Japanese names that use z. But everybody seems to call the Brontosaurus Zaur anyway so it doesn't really make a difference? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:05, 18 August 2018 (EDT)		:I guess, but we have Trypticon's and Terrorsaur's Japanese names that use z. But everybody seems to call the Brontosaurus Zaur anyway so it doesn't really make a difference? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:05, 18 August 2018 (EDT)
	::I too agree that "reptile" and modern "dinosaur" are the likeliest explanations. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:19, 18 August 2018 (EDT)		::I too agree that "reptile" and modern "dinosaur" are the likeliest explanations. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:19, 18 August 2018 (EDT)
			:::Could the "coolification" and the "outdated transliteration" not both have been factors in "Zaur"? I'd leave the outdated transliteration note on zaur, but remove the crocodile note here as that is probably not relevant at all.--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 17:16, 18 August 2018 (EDT)

	==SDCC exclusive==		==SDCC exclusive==

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 at 18:19, 18 August 2018

2018-08-18T18:19:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 18 August 2018
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Revisited: "Dile"-as-modified-"tile" seems like a much better fit for the toy than "Dile"-as-part-of-"crocodile", and if they consciously used a cool-ified -tile" here, doesn't it seem plausible that "Zaur" with the Z, which I understand is a similar kind of wordplay, was named to match, rather than being based on an outdated transliteration? -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 13:53, 18 August 2018 (EDT)		Revisited: "Dile"-as-modified-"tile" seems like a much better fit for the toy than "Dile"-as-part-of-"crocodile", and if they consciously used a cool-ified -tile" here, doesn't it seem plausible that "Zaur" with the Z, which I understand is a similar kind of wordplay, was named to match, rather than being based on an outdated transliteration? -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 13:53, 18 August 2018 (EDT)
	:I guess, but we have Trypticon's and Terrorsaur's Japanese names that use z. But everybody seems to call the Brontosaurus Zaur anyway so it doesn't really make a difference? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:05, 18 August 2018 (EDT)		:I guess, but we have Trypticon's and Terrorsaur's Japanese names that use z. But everybody seems to call the Brontosaurus Zaur anyway so it doesn't really make a difference? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:05, 18 August 2018 (EDT)
			::I too agree that "reptile" and modern "dinosaur" are the likeliest explanations. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:19, 18 August 2018 (EDT)

	==SDCC exclusive==		==SDCC exclusive==

Saix: /* Random thought */

2018-08-18T18:05:26Z

Random thought

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 18 August 2018
Line 28:		Line 28:
	::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)		::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)
	Revisited: "Dile"-as-modified-"tile" seems like a much better fit for the toy than "Dile"-as-part-of-"crocodile", and if they consciously used a cool-ified -tile" here, doesn't it seem plausible that "Zaur" with the Z, which I understand is a similar kind of wordplay, was named to match, rather than being based on an outdated transliteration? -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 13:53, 18 August 2018 (EDT)		Revisited: "Dile"-as-modified-"tile" seems like a much better fit for the toy than "Dile"-as-part-of-"crocodile", and if they consciously used a cool-ified -tile" here, doesn't it seem plausible that "Zaur" with the Z, which I understand is a similar kind of wordplay, was named to match, rather than being based on an outdated transliteration? -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 13:53, 18 August 2018 (EDT)
			:I guess, but we have Trypticon's and Terrorsaur's Japanese names that use z. But everybody seems to call the Brontosaurus Zaur anyway so it doesn't really make a difference? [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:05, 18 August 2018 (EDT)

	==SDCC exclusive==		==SDCC exclusive==

LV: /* Random thought */

2018-08-18T17:53:52Z

Random thought

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 18 August 2018
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:::Should we add this to the page?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 26 November 2016 (EST)		:::Should we add this to the page?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 26 November 2016 (EST)
	::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)		::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)
			Revisited: "Dile"-as-modified-"tile" seems like a much better fit for the toy than "Dile"-as-part-of-"crocodile", and if they consciously used a cool-ified -tile" here, doesn't it seem plausible that "Zaur" with the Z, which I understand is a similar kind of wordplay, was named to match, rather than being based on an outdated transliteration? -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 13:53, 18 August 2018 (EDT)

	==SDCC exclusive==		==SDCC exclusive==

ItsWalky: /* SDCC exclusive */

2018-06-29T19:30:06Z

SDCC exclusive

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 29 June 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
	:::Yeah, if we take Hasbro's package labeling literally, these are movieverse characters. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 13:26, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		:::Yeah, if we take Hasbro's package labeling literally, these are movieverse characters. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 13:26, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
			:::: Fine by me. I'd prefer to keep Dile where we can. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 15:30, 29 June 2018 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 at 17:26, 29 June 2018

2018-06-29T17:26:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 29 June 2018
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
	::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
			:::Yeah, if we take Hasbro's package labeling literally, these are movieverse characters. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 13:26, 29 June 2018 (EDT)

Thylacine 2000: /* SDCC exclusive */

2018-06-29T17:10:27Z

SDCC exclusive

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 29 June 2018
Line 31:		Line 31:
	i guess this guy has an official english name now, so, uh --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:15, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		i guess this guy has an official english name now, so, uh --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:15, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
	:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
			::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)

Escargon: /* SDCC exclusive */

2018-06-29T15:22:56Z

SDCC exclusive

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 29 June 2018
Line 30:		Line 30:
	==SDCC exclusive==		==SDCC exclusive==
	i guess this guy has an official english name now, so, uh --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:15, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		i guess this guy has an official english name now, so, uh --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:15, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
			:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 9 January 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	===Huh?===		===Huh?===
	Wait, given the whole thing about the Chinese MMO names, shouldn't this be at "Diaru" per the "straight romanisation" thing? - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 17:23, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		Wait, given the whole thing about the Chinese MMO names, shouldn't this be at "Diaru" per the "straight romanisation" thing? - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 17:23, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
	:The Chinese names were in Chinese, so we put them up in Chinese. This is a case of an English word being written out in Japanese characters (as is the case with nearly all Japanese Transformers names), so we go use the word that it's actually supposed to be, rather than a mangled in-betweener. It's why Minerva isn't at "Mineruba", or Lio Conoy isn't at "Rio Konboi." Compare it with [[Suiken]] or [[Yukikaze]], where their name actually IS a Japanese word, so we use that word. [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:15, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		:The Chinese names were in Chinese, so we put them up in Chinese. This is a case of an English word being written out in Japanese characters (as is the case with nearly all Japanese Transformers names), so we go use the word that it's actually supposed to be, rather than a mangled in-betweener. It's why Minerva isn't at "Mineruba", or Lio Conoy isn't at "Rio Konboi." Compare it with Suiken or Yukikaze, where their name actually IS a Japanese word, so we use that word. [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:15, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
	::If that's the idea, then since when is "Dile" an English word? Even if it was written like that, it would be a "Minelba" case, surely. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 20:27, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		::If that's the idea, then since when is "Dile" an English word? Even if it was written like that, it would be a "Minelba" case, surely. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 20:27, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
	:::Short for croco''dile'', as his partner Saur is short of dino''saur''. It's a theme. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:30, 25 March 2012 (EDT)		:::Short for croco''dile'', as his partner Saur is short of dino''saur''. It's a theme. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:30, 25 March 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 18 May 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	It could be rep'''tile''', with the first syllable voiced, like how Saur's name is pronounced with a voiced consonant. It seems a better guess than associating an ''Iguanodon'' with an animal it's barely related to. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 01:28, 8 May 2015 (EDT)		It could be rep'''tile''', with the first syllable voiced, like how Saur's name is pronounced with a voiced consonant. It seems a better guess than associating an ''Iguanodon'' with an animal it's barely related to. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 01:28, 8 May 2015 (EDT)
	:"Barely related to" is a little much, since they're both archosaurs, but I think your hypothesis certainly makes more sense...that is, if that's a way Japanese works, about which I have no idea. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 02:39, 8 May 2015 (EDT)		:"Barely related to" is a little much, since they're both archosaurs, but I think your hypothesis certainly makes more sense...that is, if that's a way Japanese works, about which I have no idea. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 02:39, 8 May 2015 (EDT)
	::"Reptile" in Japanese transliteration is レプタイル. Ta (タ) is differentiated from da (ダ) by those two lines; messing around with that is a trick that Takara loves, like with [[Gob]] and [[Terrormander]], etc. I might be totally wrong with the namer's intention, but it's something that popped in my head tonight. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 02:50, 8 May 2015 (EDT)		::"Reptile" in Japanese transliteration is レプタイル. Ta (タ) is differentiated from da (ダ) by those two lines; messing around with that is a trick that Takara loves, like with [[Gobu\|Gob]] and [[Terrormander]], etc. I might be totally wrong with the namer's intention, but it's something that popped in my head tonight. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 02:50, 8 May 2015 (EDT)
	:::Should we add this to the page?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 26 November 2016 (EST)		:::Should we add this to the page?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 26 November 2016 (EST)
	::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)		::::Sounds probable to me. As good a guess as any. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2016 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 29 June 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
	:::Yeah, if we take Hasbro's package labeling literally, these are movieverse characters. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 13:26, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		:::Yeah, if we take Hasbro's package labeling literally, these are movieverse characters. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 13:26, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
			:::: Fine by me. I'd prefer to keep Dile where we can. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 15:30, 29 June 2018 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 29 June 2018
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
	::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
			:::Yeah, if we take Hasbro's package labeling literally, these are movieverse characters. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 13:26, 29 June 2018 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 29 June 2018
Line 31:		Line 31:
	i guess this guy has an official english name now, so, uh --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:15, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		i guess this guy has an official english name now, so, uh --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:15, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
	:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)		:Considering these are being sold with a Movie toy, I'm not so sure. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
			::Since these are both Movie characters, they shouldn't be on the G1 pages. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 13:10, 29 June 2018 (EDT)