Talk:Doomsday Redux! - Revision history

Primestar3 at 02:05, 26 September 2015

2015-09-26T02:05:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 26 September 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category. And of course, a comic is not a toy lol. We have to change the ~~temlate~~.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)		::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category. And of course, a comic is not a toy lol. We have to change the template.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)

Primestar3 at 02:04, 26 September 2015

2015-09-26T02:04:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 26 September 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)		::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category. And of course, a comic is not a toy lol. We have to change the temlate.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)

Primestar3 at 02:04, 26 September 2015

2015-09-26T02:04:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 26 September 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)
			::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)

Giggidy: /* Apocrapha Redux */

2015-08-18T13:48:42Z

Apocrapha Redux

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 18 August 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)		:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)

Giggidy: /* Apocrapha Redux */

2015-08-18T13:48:16Z

Apocrapha Redux

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 18 August 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)		:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
			::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)

Broadside: /* Apocrapha Redux */

2015-08-17T22:28:58Z

Apocrapha Redux

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 17 August 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::I'm not sure. I think we should bite the bullet and do that for [[Alignment]] as it actually got printed; stuff that never came out, OTOH, feels like something we should leave. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 00:55, 14 August 2015 (GMT)		::I'm not sure. I think we should bite the bullet and do that for [[Alignment]] as it actually got printed; stuff that never came out, OTOH, feels like something we should leave. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 00:55, 14 August 2015 (GMT)
	:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)		:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
			::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)

Giggidy: /* Apocrapha Redux */

2015-08-16T03:43:22Z

Apocrapha Redux

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 16 August 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Any other opinions? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:08, 13 August 2015 (EDT)		:Any other opinions? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:08, 13 August 2015 (EDT)
	::I'm not sure. I think we should bite the bullet and do that for [[Alignment]] as it actually got printed; stuff that never came out, OTOH, feels like something we should leave. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 00:55, 14 August 2015 (GMT)		::I'm not sure. I think we should bite the bullet and do that for [[Alignment]] as it actually got printed; stuff that never came out, OTOH, feels like something we should leave. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 00:55, 14 August 2015 (GMT)
			:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)

Charles RB: /* Apocrapha Redux */

2015-08-13T23:56:08Z

Apocrapha Redux

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 13 August 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Since Ask Vector Prime declared these as canon, and more specifically canon for this specific universe stream, should we remove the Apocrapha template? Possibly add in a note towards the top explaining the situation? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 00:50, 12 August 2015 (EDT)		Since Ask Vector Prime declared these as canon, and more specifically canon for this specific universe stream, should we remove the Apocrapha template? Possibly add in a note towards the top explaining the situation? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 00:50, 12 August 2015 (EDT)
	:Any other opinions? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:08, 13 August 2015 (EDT)		:Any other opinions? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:08, 13 August 2015 (EDT)
			::I'm not sure. I think we should bite the bullet and do that for [[Alignment]] as it actually got printed; stuff that never came out, OTOH, feels like something we should leave. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 00:55, 14 August 2015 (GMT)

Giggidy at 22:08, 13 August 2015

2015-08-13T22:08:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 13 August 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Apocrapha Redux==		==Apocrapha Redux==
	Since Ask Vector Prime declared these as canon, and more specifically canon for this specific universe stream, should we remove the Apocrapha template? Possibly add in a note towards the top explaining the situation? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 00:50, 12 August 2015 (EDT)		Since Ask Vector Prime declared these as canon, and more specifically canon for this specific universe stream, should we remove the Apocrapha template? Possibly add in a note towards the top explaining the situation? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 00:50, 12 August 2015 (EDT)
			:Any other opinions? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:08, 13 August 2015 (EDT)

Giggidy at 04:50, 12 August 2015

2015-08-12T04:50:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 12 August 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Wouldn't these get the apocrypha template? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:30, 17 December 2010 (EST)		:Wouldn't these get the apocrypha template? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:30, 17 December 2010 (EST)
	::I'd think so. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 13:53, 17 December 2010 (EST)		::I'd think so. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 13:53, 17 December 2010 (EST)

			==Apocrapha Redux==
			Since Ask Vector Prime declared these as canon, and more specifically canon for this specific universe stream, should we remove the Apocrapha template? Possibly add in a note towards the top explaining the situation? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 00:50, 12 August 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 26 September 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category. And of course, a comic is not a toy lol. We have to change the ~~temlate~~.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)		::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category. And of course, a comic is not a toy lol. We have to change the template.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 26 September 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)		::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category. And of course, a comic is not a toy lol. We have to change the temlate.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 26 September 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)
			::::::Unreleased Toy template added this comic to "Unreleased Toys" category.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 18 August 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)		:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)		:::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 18 August 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)		:::But Furman sells the scripts at conventions, and they were approved by Hasbro. Just not ultimately published. And does Vector Prime saying they're the true future of the universe carry any weight? --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 23:43, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
	::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)		::::We don't treat toys as being "not legitimate" because they weren't released. Obviously the situation is different for comics, but I think the template should be removed from this page, and replaced with some kind of "unreleased" template. Hell, the unreleased toy/item template would probably work just as well here as it does on toy entries; just put it in place of the Apocrypha template. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (EDT)
			::::This works well. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:48, 18 August 2015 (EDT)