Talk:Dual Energon Swords - Revision history

Kalb157: /* Rise of the Beasts blades */

2025-06-20T21:08:25Z

Rise of the Beasts blades

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 20 June 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:
	== Rise of the Beasts blades ==		== Rise of the Beasts blades ==

	Should we add a section for the arm blades Prime uses in ''Rise of the Beasts''? They're clearly intended to evoke the blades from the Bay movies, especially considering Caple Jr.'s attitude towards the original trilogy being canon to ROTB.		Should we add a section for the arm blades Prime uses in ''Rise of the Beasts''? They're clearly intended to evoke the blades from the Bay movies, especially considering Caple Jr.'s attitude towards the original trilogy being canon to ROTB. -- Kalb157 17:07, 20 June 2025 (EDT)

Kalb157: /* Rise of the Beasts blades */

2025-06-20T21:06:56Z

Rise of the Beasts blades

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 20 June 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:
	== Rise of the Beasts blades ==		== Rise of the Beasts blades ==

	Should we add a section for the arm blades Prime uses in ''Rise of the Beasts?'' They're clearly intended to evoke the blades from the Bay movies, especially considering Caple Jr.'s attitude towards the original trilogy being canon to ROTB.		Should we add a section for the arm blades Prime uses in ''Rise of the Beasts''? They're clearly intended to evoke the blades from the Bay movies, especially considering Caple Jr.'s attitude towards the original trilogy being canon to ROTB.

Kalb157: /* Rise of the Beasts blades */ new section

2025-06-20T21:06:36Z

Rise of the Beasts blades: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 20 June 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::Prime's Battle Bio calls them "Dual Energon Swords", with capitalization. That could be part of their proper name. See here: [http://www.hasbro.com/transformers/en_US/discover/Battle-Bios.cfm]. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:::Prime's Battle Bio calls them "Dual Energon Swords", with capitalization. That could be part of their proper name. See here: [http://www.hasbro.com/transformers/en_US/discover/Battle-Bios.cfm]. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

			== Rise of the Beasts blades ==

			Should we add a section for the arm blades Prime uses in ''Rise of the Beasts?'' They're clearly intended to evoke the blades from the Bay movies, especially considering Caple Jr.'s attitude towards the original trilogy being canon to ROTB.

Jimsorenson: /* Dual? */

2009-10-06T16:10:30Z

Dual?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 6 October 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::Prime's Battle Bio calls them "Dual Energon Swords", with capitalization. That could be part of their proper name. See here: [http://www.hasbro.com/transformers/en_US/discover/Battle-Bios.cfm]. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

Rosicrucian: /* Dual? */

2009-10-06T16:06:32Z

Dual?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 6 October 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I realize that Optimus Prime has a pair of these, but making the article a plural goes against the naming convention of most other weapon articles we've made. If we consider that even [[Nucleon shock gauntlet]]s entertain the possibility of having only one mounted on your arm, this article looks a bit silly.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:47, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		I realize that Optimus Prime has a pair of these, but making the article a plural goes against the naming convention of most other weapon articles we've made. If we consider that even [[Nucleon shock gauntlet]]s entertain the possibility of having only one mounted on your arm, this article looks a bit silly.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:47, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Dual? */

2009-10-06T15:59:53Z

Dual?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 6 October 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I realize that Optimus Prime has a pair of these, but making the article a plural goes against the naming convention of most other weapon articles we've made. If we consider that even [[Nucleon shock gauntlet]]s entertain the possibility of having only one mounted on your arm, this article looks a bit silly.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:47, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		I realize that Optimus Prime has a pair of these, but making the article a plural goes against the naming convention of most other weapon articles we've made. If we consider that even [[Nucleon shock gauntlet]]s entertain the possibility of having only one mounted on your arm, this article looks a bit silly.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:47, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

Rosicrucian: /* Dual? */ new section

2009-10-06T15:47:15Z

Dual?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 6 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	The hooks and swords are different weapons. Prime uses the hooks to slice off his parachute in Shanghai. He retracts his swords to punch Megatron during the forest fight. The swords never broke. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:34, 8 July 2009 (EDT)		The hooks and swords are different weapons. Prime uses the hooks to slice off his parachute in Shanghai. He retracts his swords to punch Megatron during the forest fight. The swords never broke. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:34, 8 July 2009 (EDT)
	:Yeah... I was the one who put that in there. I noticed after my most recent trip to the theater that the hooks and the blades are totally different weapons. I guess when he ripped apart Grindor's face, while the bottoms were glowing it kinda confused me the first time. I've been meaning to fix it, but haven't got to it yet.--[[User:AWT88\|AWT88]] 10:43, 8 July 2009 (EDT)		:Yeah... I was the one who put that in there. I noticed after my most recent trip to the theater that the hooks and the blades are totally different weapons. I guess when he ripped apart Grindor's face, while the bottoms were glowing it kinda confused me the first time. I've been meaning to fix it, but haven't got to it yet.--[[User:AWT88\|AWT88]] 10:43, 8 July 2009 (EDT)

			== Dual? ==

			I realize that Optimus Prime has a pair of these, but making the article a plural goes against the naming convention of most other weapon articles we've made. If we consider that even [[Nucleon shock gauntlet]]s entertain the possibility of having only one mounted on your arm, this article looks a bit silly.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:47, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

SFH: Talk:Battle blade moved to Talk:Dual Energon Swords: A more accurate name.

2009-08-09T04:44:20Z

Talk:Battle blade moved to Talk:Dual Energon Swords: A more accurate name.

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:44, 9 August 2009
(No difference)

AWT88: /* Hooks/swords */

2009-07-08T14:43:02Z

Hooks/swords

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 8 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Hooks/swords==		==Hooks/swords==
	The hooks and swords are different weapons. Prime uses the hooks to slice off his parachute in Shanghai. He retracts his swords to punch Megatron during the forest fight. The swords never broke. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:34, 8 July 2009 (EDT)		The hooks and swords are different weapons. Prime uses the hooks to slice off his parachute in Shanghai. He retracts his swords to punch Megatron during the forest fight. The swords never broke. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:34, 8 July 2009 (EDT)
			:Yeah... I was the one who put that in there. I noticed after my most recent trip to the theater that the hooks and the blades are totally different weapons. I guess when he ripped apart Grindor's face, while the bottoms were glowing it kinda confused me the first time. I've been meaning to fix it, but haven't got to it yet.--[[User:AWT88\|AWT88]] 10:43, 8 July 2009 (EDT)

FFN: New page: ==Hooks/swords== The hooks and swords are different weapons. Prime uses the hooks to slice off his parachute in Shanghai. He retracts his swords to punch Megatron during the forest fight. ...

2009-07-08T12:34:39Z

New page: ==Hooks/swords== The hooks and swords are different weapons. Prime uses the hooks to slice off his parachute in Shanghai. He retracts his swords to punch Megatron during the forest fight. ...

New page

==Hooks/swords==
The hooks and swords are different weapons. Prime uses the hooks to slice off his parachute in Shanghai. He retracts his swords to punch Megatron during the forest fight. The swords never broke. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 08:34, 8 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 6 October 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::Prime's Battle Bio calls them "Dual Energon Swords", with capitalization. That could be part of their proper name. See here: [http://www.hasbro.com/transformers/en_US/discover/Battle-Bios.cfm]. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 12:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 6 October 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I realize that Optimus Prime has a pair of these, but making the article a plural goes against the naming convention of most other weapon articles we've made. If we consider that even [[Nucleon shock gauntlet]]s entertain the possibility of having only one mounted on your arm, this article looks a bit silly.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:47, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		I realize that Optimus Prime has a pair of these, but making the article a plural goes against the naming convention of most other weapon articles we've made. If we consider that even [[Nucleon shock gauntlet]]s entertain the possibility of having only one mounted on your arm, this article looks a bit silly.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:47, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:I think you are right. It is just kind of unfortunate "Energon sword" is so generic-sounding. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:59, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			::Of course, we already (essentially) [[Energo weapon\|have an article for it]]--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:06, 6 October 2009 (EDT)