Talk:Dungeons & Dinobots - Revision history

HydraDW: /* Another error? */ new section

2012-07-30T08:11:02Z

Another error?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 30 July 2012
Line 27:		Line 27:

	So I ordered a couple back issues of the TFCC mag recently and was a bit surprised to find that the preview for this story in issue #22 actually is a whole scene that's not in the actual text story. So... I'm thinking it should get summarized somewhere, but wasn't sure where in relation to this page. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:13, 15 October 2009 (EDT)		So I ordered a couple back issues of the TFCC mag recently and was a bit surprised to find that the preview for this story in issue #22 actually is a whole scene that's not in the actual text story. So... I'm thinking it should get summarized somewhere, but wasn't sure where in relation to this page. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:13, 15 October 2009 (EDT)

			== Another error? ==

			One of the newly-intelligent Grimlock's lines is "Like most precarious children, I am merely bored." Isn't this a malapropism of the word "precocious?" "Precarious" would mean in danger, and is normally only used towards situations or places, not individuals. [[User:HydraDW\|HydraDW]] 04:11, 30 July 2012 (EDT)

Jeysie: /* Where to Put the Preview? */ new section

2009-10-15T23:13:29Z

Where to Put the Preview?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:13, 15 October 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:“Tell me why I shouldn’t rid myself of your incompetence, and let you join Chromedome on the shelf. You two will have a lot to talk about for a very long time.”		:“Tell me why I shouldn’t rid myself of your incompetence, and let you join Chromedome on the shelf. You two will have a lot to talk about for a very long time.”
	:--[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)		:--[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

			== Where to Put the Preview? ==

			So I ordered a couple back issues of the TFCC mag recently and was a bit surprised to find that the preview for this story in issue #22 actually is a whole scene that's not in the actual text story. So... I'm thinking it should get summarized somewhere, but wasn't sure where in relation to this page. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 19:13, 15 October 2009 (EDT)

Crockalley at 18:49, 12 July 2009

2009-07-12T18:49:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 12 July 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:

	What is this I hear about an SG Chromedome in D&D? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 05:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)		What is this I hear about an SG Chromedome in D&D? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 05:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)
			:Near the end of the story, Prime threatened to hang Blurr on "the shelf" next to Cromedome for failing to capture Grimlock.
			:“Tell me why I shouldn’t rid myself of your incompetence, and let you join Chromedome on the shelf. You two will have a lot to talk about for a very long time.”
			:--[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

-Blackout-: /* Chromedome */ new section

2009-07-12T09:49:34Z

Chromedome: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 12 July 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:

	::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

			== Chromedome ==

			What is this I hear about an SG Chromedome in D&D? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 05:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 23:20, 4 July 2009

2009-07-04T23:20:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 4 July 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	::Spoiler for any future story that explicitly revels that he's RID Side Burn, assuming they're building up to such a revelation. And if they're not, then I'm not so sure about absolutely stating that he's RID Side Burn. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		::Spoiler for any future story that explicitly revels that he's RID Side Burn, assuming they're building up to such a revelation. And if they're not, then I'm not so sure about absolutely stating that he's RID Side Burn. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
			:::If it's obvious from the story itself, it's not a spoiler for a future story. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:20, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

Crockalley at 22:44, 4 July 2009

2009-07-04T22:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 4 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
			::Spoiler for any future story that explicitly revels that he's RID Side Burn, assuming they're building up to such a revelation. And if they're not, then I'm not so sure about absolutely stating that he's RID Side Burn. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

			::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

-Blackout- at 20:12, 4 July 2009

2009-07-04T20:12:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 4 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	~~== Links ==~~

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

-Blackout-: /* Links */

2009-07-04T20:11:46Z

Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 4 July 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Links ==		== Links ==

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. ~~Will someone PLEASE decide on which~~ Side Burn we ~~are~~ assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

-Blackout-: /* Links */

2009-07-04T20:11:25Z

Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 4 July 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Links ==		== Links ==

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn page remains. Will someone PLEASE decide on which Side Burn we are assuming this is?		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Will someone PLEASE decide on which Side Burn we are assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

-Blackout-: /* Links */ new section

2009-07-04T20:10:53Z

Links: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 4 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

			== Links ==

			Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn page remains. Will someone PLEASE decide on which Side Burn we are assuming this is?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 4 July 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	::Spoiler for any future story that explicitly revels that he's RID Side Burn, assuming they're building up to such a revelation. And if they're not, then I'm not so sure about absolutely stating that he's RID Side Burn. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		::Spoiler for any future story that explicitly revels that he's RID Side Burn, assuming they're building up to such a revelation. And if they're not, then I'm not so sure about absolutely stating that he's RID Side Burn. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
			:::If it's obvious from the story itself, it's not a spoiler for a future story. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 19:20, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 4 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
			::Spoiler for any future story that explicitly revels that he's RID Side Burn, assuming they're building up to such a revelation. And if they're not, then I'm not so sure about absolutely stating that he's RID Side Burn. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

			::I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 4 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

	~~== Links ==~~

	Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)