Talk:Enigma of Combination - Revision history

Broadside: /* Timelines toy */ new section

2016-04-08T18:43:45Z

Timelines toy: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 8 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	It seems like it would be highly appropriate to mention the "Spark of Combination" (from TF Energon, a.k.a. the "Combination Spark" in TF Super Link) in this article about the EoC (and, for that matter, on the Infinite Combinatoric's page as well). I mean, obvious similarities aside, there's even a rather direct connection via the four "ancient combiners" (Superion Maximus, Bruticus Maximus, Constructicon Maximus, and the other guy) seen in Energon/SL. —		It seems like it would be highly appropriate to mention the "Spark of Combination" (from TF Energon, a.k.a. the "Combination Spark" in TF Super Link) in this article about the EoC (and, for that matter, on the Infinite Combinatoric's page as well). I mean, obvious similarities aside, there's even a rather direct connection via the four "ancient combiners" (Superion Maximus, Bruticus Maximus, Constructicon Maximus, and the other guy) seen in Energon/SL. —
	[[User:Greboguru\|Greboguru]] ([[User talk:Greboguru\|talk]]) 20:17, 4 September 2015 (EDT)		[[User:Greboguru\|Greboguru]] ([[User talk:Greboguru\|talk]]) 20:17, 4 September 2015 (EDT)

			== Timelines toy ==

			Should we ''not'' list the customisation class accessory on this page? Galva Convoy's accessories are listed on the [[Matrix of Conquest]] and [[Covenant of Primus]] pages, and all the other toys that came with “unofficial” accessories mention them. I figured it was an exception to the “only official product” thing, because... well, it's distributed by a Hasbro licensee as an accessory to a Hasbro-endorsed figure. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:43, 8 April 2016 (EDT)

Greboguru: /* Spark of Combination? */ new section

2015-09-05T00:17:23Z

Spark of Combination?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 5 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:It confirmed that both the Enigma of combination and the Infinite Combinatoric are one and the same. {{unsigned\|Projectus}}		:It confirmed that both the Enigma of combination and the Infinite Combinatoric are one and the same. {{unsigned\|Projectus}}
	::[[Ask Vector Prime]], you mean? I thought the answer was enigmatic and could be read either way. Maybe they're the same thing with a different name, maybe they're different, maybe they're similar expressions of an underlying idea. A note I think, but not a merge.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 17:44, 16 July 2015 (EDT)		::[[Ask Vector Prime]], you mean? I thought the answer was enigmatic and could be read either way. Maybe they're the same thing with a different name, maybe they're different, maybe they're similar expressions of an underlying idea. A note I think, but not a merge.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 17:44, 16 July 2015 (EDT)

			== Spark of Combination? ==

			It seems like it would be highly appropriate to mention the "Spark of Combination" (from TF Energon, a.k.a. the "Combination Spark" in TF Super Link) in this article about the EoC (and, for that matter, on the Infinite Combinatoric's page as well). I mean, obvious similarities aside, there's even a rather direct connection via the four "ancient combiners" (Superion Maximus, Bruticus Maximus, Constructicon Maximus, and the other guy) seen in Energon/SL. —
			[[User:Greboguru\|Greboguru]] ([[User talk:Greboguru\|talk]]) 20:17, 4 September 2015 (EDT)

Giggidy at 21:44, 16 July 2015

2015-07-16T21:44:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 16 July 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Um, this thing originated from the Covenant of Primus book in the Aligned continuity family, not first in IDW. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:26, 25 October 2014 (EDT)		Um, this thing originated from the Covenant of Primus book in the Aligned continuity family, not first in IDW. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:26, 25 October 2014 (EDT)
	* It confirmed that both the Enigma of combination and the Infinite Combinatoric are one and the same.		:It confirmed that both the Enigma of combination and the Infinite Combinatoric are one and the same. {{unsigned\|Projectus}}
			::[[Ask Vector Prime]], you mean? I thought the answer was enigmatic and could be read either way. Maybe they're the same thing with a different name, maybe they're different, maybe they're similar expressions of an underlying idea. A note I think, but not a merge.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 17:44, 16 July 2015 (EDT)

Projectus at 19:25, 16 July 2015

2015-07-16T19:25:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 16 July 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Um, this thing originated from the Covenant of Primus book in the Aligned continuity family, not first in IDW. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:26, 25 October 2014 (EDT)		Um, this thing originated from the Covenant of Primus book in the Aligned continuity family, not first in IDW. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:26, 25 October 2014 (EDT)
			* It confirmed that both the Enigma of combination and the Infinite Combinatoric are one and the same.

Sabrblade: Created page with "Um, this thing originated from the Covenant of Primus book in the Aligned continuity family, not first in IDW. --~~~~"

2014-10-26T01:26:53Z

Created page with "Um, this thing originated from the Covenant of Primus book in the Aligned continuity family, not first in IDW. --~~~~"

New page

Um, this thing originated from the Covenant of Primus book in the Aligned continuity family, not first in IDW. --[[User:Sabrblade|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade|talk]]) 21:26, 25 October 2014 (EDT)